Aaron & Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash & Gump) CLE

{"id":309743019,"title":"Course #427- Ethics: Disabilities Under the ADA and the FEHA - CD","handle":"course-427-ethics-disabilities-under-the-ada-and-the-feha-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 427\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the difficulties of employment law is that it is constantly changing. This presentation will aid practitioners by providing a basic outline for analyzing the most common employment laws. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Analytical Outline for popular employment laws\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Wrongful Termination Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Protected classes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the four most commonly used federal employment statues\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the two types of discrimination\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain a \"hostile work environment\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:01-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:01-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","disability-social-security-law","discrimination-harassment","ethics","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43532441036,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 427","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #427- Ethics: Disabilities Under the ADA and the FEHA - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5413535823,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 427\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the difficulties of employment law is that it is constantly changing. This presentation will aid practitioners by providing a basic outline for analyzing the most common employment laws. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Analytical Outline for popular employment laws\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Wrongful Termination Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Protected classes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the four most commonly used federal employment statues\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the two types of discrimination\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain a \"hostile work environment\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":4842065920079,"title":"675 Series.. 17 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 675 SERIES---All New---","handle":"copy-of-1-675-series-26-unit-cle-cd-bundle-675-series-all-new-1","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e17 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"\u003eBundle\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cmeta content=\"Sheets\" name=\"generator\"\u003e\n\u003cstyle type=\"text\/css\"\u003e\u003c!--\ntd {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}\n--\u003e\u003c\/style\u003e\n\u003ctable xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" dir=\"ltr\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol width=\"506\"\u003e\u003c\/colgroup\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 641 Personal Injury Law: Telling Your Client's Story\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 649 Forthcoming Commercial Cannabis Regulations\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 650 Local Marijuana Policy\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 651 Marijuana Private Non-Profit Corporations\"}'\u003eCourse 543 Real Estate Law: Partition Sales and Accounting\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 652 Medicinal Cannabis vs. Adult Use, Prop 420 vs. 64\"}'\u003eCourse 548 Protecting Contractor Remedies\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003eCourse 653 Criminal Law Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 655 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\"}'\u003eCourse 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\"}'\u003eCourse 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Identity \u0026amp; Expression in the Workplace\"}'\u003eCourse 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Workplace Issues\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 659 Criminal Law for Civil Litigators\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 654 Real Estate Disclosure Law\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\"}'\u003eCourse 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\"}'\u003eCourse 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 663 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003eCourse 663 Law Practice Management\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u0026quot;}\"\u003eCourse 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 665 Cannabis: The New Era of Enforcement After Proposition 64\"}'\u003eCourse 665 Cannabis:  Enforcement After Proposition 64\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\"}'\u003eCourse 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\"}'\u003eCourse 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\"}'\u003eCourse 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\"}'\u003eCourse 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 670 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones'\u0026quot;}\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones'\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 674 Representing Clients at a Social Security Administration Hearing\"}'\u003eCourse 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\"}'\u003eCourse 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"COURSE LIST\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 677 Immigration: \"Particular Social Group\" Asylum(Trump Era)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 677 Immigration: \\\"Particular Social Group\\\" Asylum(Trump Era)\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 670 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 682 Mock Trial of John Wilkes Booth for President Lincoln Assassination\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 680 US Supreme Court Masterpiece Cake Shop vs Colorado Civil Rts Comm\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\" 683 US Supreme Court Bucklew vs. Precythe\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e","published_at":"2020-12-03T15:43:06-08:00","created_at":"2020-12-03T15:38:21-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["26 Hr","alternative-dispute-resolution","bankruptcy-restructuring","bundle-course","business-corporate-securities-law","cds","civil-rights","constitutional-law","construction-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","criminal-law","disability-social-security-law","discovery-e-discovery","elimination-of-bias","entertainment-law","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","immigration-law","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","marijuana-law","personal-injury-and-negligence","privacy-cybersecurity","real-estate","technology","workers-compensation"],"price":27900,"price_min":27900,"price_max":27900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":32767749357647,"title":"17 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","option1":"17 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":null,"requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"675 Series.. 17 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 675 SERIES---All New--- - 17 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","public_title":"17 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","options":["17 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES"],"price":27900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":19,"inventory_management":"shopify","inventory_policy":"continue","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_89a974be-05bd-4540-b31c-975a59ad4b0f.jpg?v=1607038894"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_89a974be-05bd-4540-b31c-975a59ad4b0f.jpg?v=1607038894","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":8177173299279,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.297,"height":1217,"width":1579,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_89a974be-05bd-4540-b31c-975a59ad4b0f.jpg?v=1607038894"},"aspect_ratio":1.297,"height":1217,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_89a974be-05bd-4540-b31c-975a59ad4b0f.jpg?v=1607038894","width":1579}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e17 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"\u003eBundle\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cmeta content=\"Sheets\" name=\"generator\"\u003e\n\u003cstyle type=\"text\/css\"\u003e\u003c!--\ntd {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}\n--\u003e\u003c\/style\u003e\n\u003ctable xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" dir=\"ltr\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol width=\"506\"\u003e\u003c\/colgroup\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 641 Personal Injury Law: Telling Your Client's Story\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 649 Forthcoming Commercial Cannabis Regulations\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 650 Local Marijuana Policy\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 651 Marijuana Private Non-Profit Corporations\"}'\u003eCourse 543 Real Estate Law: Partition Sales and Accounting\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 652 Medicinal Cannabis vs. Adult Use, Prop 420 vs. 64\"}'\u003eCourse 548 Protecting Contractor Remedies\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003eCourse 653 Criminal Law Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 655 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\"}'\u003eCourse 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\"}'\u003eCourse 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Identity \u0026amp; Expression in the Workplace\"}'\u003eCourse 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Workplace Issues\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 659 Criminal Law for Civil Litigators\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 654 Real Estate Disclosure Law\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\"}'\u003eCourse 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\"}'\u003eCourse 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 663 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003eCourse 663 Law Practice Management\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u0026quot;}\"\u003eCourse 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 665 Cannabis: The New Era of Enforcement After Proposition 64\"}'\u003eCourse 665 Cannabis:  Enforcement After Proposition 64\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\"}'\u003eCourse 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\"}'\u003eCourse 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\"}'\u003eCourse 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\"}'\u003eCourse 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 670 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones'\u0026quot;}\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones'\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 674 Representing Clients at a Social Security Administration Hearing\"}'\u003eCourse 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\"}'\u003eCourse 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"COURSE LIST\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 677 Immigration: \"Particular Social Group\" Asylum(Trump Era)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 677 Immigration: \\\"Particular Social Group\\\" Asylum(Trump Era)\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 670 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\nCourse 682 Mock Trial of John Wilkes Booth for President Lincoln Assassination\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 680 US Supreme Court Masterpiece Cake Shop vs Colorado Civil Rts Comm\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\" 683 US Supreme Court Bucklew vs. Precythe\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e"}

{"id":309727371,"title":"Course #306- Bias: How To Do A Sexual Harassment Investigation - CD","handle":"course-306-bias-how-to-do-a-sexual-harassment-investigation-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 306\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTen years ago, the EEOC issued a policy on sexual harassment. This discussion will present the EEOC's advice and offer suggestions for conducting investigations, based on the case law. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to investigate complaints of sexual harassment under the EEOC policy\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to investigate other types of discrimination and harassment: race, age, disability, and religion, as well as the differences between each\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:47:45-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T13:47:45-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","elimination-of-bias","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43596472012,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 306","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #306- Bias: How To Do A Sexual Harassment Investigation - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412126799,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 306\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTen years ago, the EEOC issued a policy on sexual harassment. This discussion will present the EEOC's advice and offer suggestions for conducting investigations, based on the case law. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to investigate complaints of sexual harassment under the EEOC policy\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to investigate other types of discrimination and harassment: race, age, disability, and religion, as well as the differences between each\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11487810508,"title":"Course #546- Real Estate, Labor \u0026 Tax Law: Bararsani vs. Coldwell Banker - CD","handle":"course-546-real-estate-labor-tax-law-bararsani-vs-coldwell-banker-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Stephen Beede, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 546\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIs a real estate agent an independent contractor or an employee? The legal challenge: Will Common Law Trump the Exception? We will cover the legal cases of Bararsani vs Coldwell Banker, Monell vs Boston Pads, Galen vs Redfin, Cruz vs Redfin. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Independent Contractor vs Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Exemptions for Real Estate Professionals\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Will Common Law Trump Exemption?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Questions for the Real Estate Profession if the rules are changed\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Impacts on other industries\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives: \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn what the IRS 20 Point Test and the 3 Point Test are\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExamine the effects on agents and how their jobs will change\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several other industries that will be affected as well\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eStephen Beede is a Real Estate Attorney in Sacramento, CA, at the BPE Law Firm. Since 1977, he has been involved with real estate as an owner, developer, manager, broker and attorney. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-07T14:00:55-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["bararsani","cds","coldwell banker","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","crux vs redfin","general","independent contractor","intermediate","irs","keys to protecting new contractor","labor-employment-law","real-estate","single-course","tax-law"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43480257612,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"546 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #546- Real Estate, Labor \u0026 Tax Law: Bararsani vs. Coldwell Banker - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_054482bf-27b2-49b0-8ecc-c882e185ef13.jpg?v=1502139658"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_054482bf-27b2-49b0-8ecc-c882e185ef13.jpg?v=1502139658","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":437064958031,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.703,"height":600,"width":422,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_054482bf-27b2-49b0-8ecc-c882e185ef13.jpg?v=1502139658"},"aspect_ratio":0.703,"height":600,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_054482bf-27b2-49b0-8ecc-c882e185ef13.jpg?v=1502139658","width":422}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Stephen Beede, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 546\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIs a real estate agent an independent contractor or an employee? The legal challenge: Will Common Law Trump the Exception? We will cover the legal cases of Bararsani vs Coldwell Banker, Monell vs Boston Pads, Galen vs Redfin, Cruz vs Redfin. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Independent Contractor vs Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Exemptions for Real Estate Professionals\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Will Common Law Trump Exemption?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Questions for the Real Estate Profession if the rules are changed\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Impacts on other industries\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives: \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn what the IRS 20 Point Test and the 3 Point Test are\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExamine the effects on agents and how their jobs will change\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several other industries that will be affected as well\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eStephen Beede is a Real Estate Attorney in Sacramento, CA, at the BPE Law Firm. Since 1977, he has been involved with real estate as an owner, developer, manager, broker and attorney. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":424570111,"title":"Course #509- Bias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026 Discrimination (Transgender) - webinar","handle":"copy-of-copy-of-course-510-webinar-ethics-ethical-and-legal-implications-of-ebola-part-i","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeakers: Emma Forest, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 509\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers Harassment, Retaliation and Discrimination and 11 New Laws.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Employees on Public Assistance\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Criminal conviction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. National Origin\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Suspected Undocumented workers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Immigration Status Protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6. Employee exercise of labor code rights\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e7. Enhanced whistleblower protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e8. Abuse conduct prevention training\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e9. Harassment prohibition extends to unpaid interns\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e10. Revised definition of sexual harassment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e11. Stalking victims added to Labor Code Protections\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e12. Macy v. Holder\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEmma Forrest is an attorney in Sacramento, California, with 16 years of experience in the areas of labor and employment, real estate, construction defect, insurance bad faith, personal injury, medical and professional malpractice, intellectual property, technology, and business litigation for both plaintiffs and defendants in California state and federal courts.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-12-26T10:38:00-08:00","created_at":"2014-12-26T10:38:09-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","elimination-of-bias","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":1061439339,"title":"500 Webinar series, 26 hours of MCLE, 4 ethics, 1 Substance Abuse, 1 Bias","option1":"500 Webinar series, 26 hours of MCLE, 4 ethics, 1 Substance Abuse, 1 Bias","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #509- Bias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026 Discrimination (Transgender) - webinar - 500 Webinar series, 26 hours of MCLE, 4 ethics, 1 Substance Abuse, 1 Bias","public_title":"500 Webinar series, 26 hours of MCLE, 4 ethics, 1 Substance Abuse, 1 Bias","options":["500 Webinar series, 26 hours of MCLE, 4 ethics, 1 Substance Abuse, 1 Bias"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300.png?v=1501867517"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300.png?v=1501867517","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":11619467343,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.707,"height":300,"width":212,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300.png?v=1501867517"},"aspect_ratio":0.707,"height":300,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300.png?v=1501867517","width":212}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeakers: Emma Forest, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 509\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers Harassment, Retaliation and Discrimination and 11 New Laws.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Employees on Public Assistance\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Criminal conviction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. National Origin\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Suspected Undocumented workers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Immigration Status Protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6. Employee exercise of labor code rights\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e7. Enhanced whistleblower protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e8. Abuse conduct prevention training\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e9. Harassment prohibition extends to unpaid interns\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e10. Revised definition of sexual harassment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e11. Stalking victims added to Labor Code Protections\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e12. Macy v. Holder\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEmma Forrest is an attorney in Sacramento, California, with 16 years of experience in the areas of labor and employment, real estate, construction defect, insurance bad faith, personal injury, medical and professional malpractice, intellectual property, technology, and business litigation for both plaintiffs and defendants in California state and federal courts.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11517464972,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:22:21-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660277196,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442204192847,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11517461964,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:21:57-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660272460,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442203963471,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11517409356,"title":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - MP3","handle":"course-338-chamber-of-commerce-v-brown-labor-law-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:09:48-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:12:58-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659973836,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 338","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442203177039,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":309732863,"title":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - CD","handle":"course-337-meacham-v-knolls-atomic-power-lab-labor-law-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:09:48-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:09:48-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659852044,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 338","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412651087,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11500747404,"title":"Course #516- Labor Law: Conflict of Law in Labor and Discrimination Casework - MP3","handle":"course-516-labor-law-conflict-of-law-in-labor-and-discrimination-casework-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: David Axelrod, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 516\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Review of current trends in labor, employment, discrimination, and civil rights law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. State and federal law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. significant statutory and case-law authorities\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze interface and interplay between various areas of state and federal law\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify overlaps and conflicts of laws and legal jurisdictions\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eDavid Axelrod, B.S., J.D., Attorney at Law, graduated from the University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law, 1988. He has been a practicing attorney and member of the California State Bar since 1988.\u003c\/em\u003e","published_at":"2014-12-30T15:37:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-10T15:46:45-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43576753292,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 516","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #516- Labor Law: Conflict of Law in Labor and Discrimination Casework - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_7a4e306c-a023-4098-93ed-fc973535816a.jpg?v=1502405205"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_7a4e306c-a023-4098-93ed-fc973535816a.jpg?v=1502405205","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":439315103823,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_7a4e306c-a023-4098-93ed-fc973535816a.jpg?v=1502405205"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_7a4e306c-a023-4098-93ed-fc973535816a.jpg?v=1502405205","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: David Axelrod, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 516\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Review of current trends in labor, employment, discrimination, and civil rights law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. State and federal law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. significant statutory and case-law authorities\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze interface and interplay between various areas of state and federal law\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify overlaps and conflicts of laws and legal jurisdictions\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eDavid Axelrod, B.S., J.D., Attorney at Law, graduated from the University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law, 1988. He has been a practicing attorney and member of the California State Bar since 1988.\u003c\/em\u003e"}

{"id":448475735,"title":"Course #548- Protecting Contractor Remedies - webinar","handle":"course-533-protecting-contractor-remedies-1-hour-webinar","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jack Kenealy\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 548, Protecting Contractor Remedies\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Statutory Overview and Definitions, 1pm to 120 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Mechanics Liens 120 pm to 140 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Stop Notices for Private and Public Works 140 pm to 2pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the differences between private and public stop notices\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn in which type of actions are attorneys fees and interest available as remedies to the prevailing party\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand when a summary procedure is available\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJack Kenealy is an attorney in Woodland, California specializing in Contractor Law\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T11:13:00-08:00","created_at":"2015-01-31T11:13:18-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["construction-law","contract-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43576557260,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"548 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #548- Protecting Contractor Remedies - webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_bbb95a6d-e95b-4726-87c3-fb52484bcde0.jpg?v=1502403819"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_bbb95a6d-e95b-4726-87c3-fb52484bcde0.jpg?v=1502403819","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":12994248783,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_bbb95a6d-e95b-4726-87c3-fb52484bcde0.jpg?v=1502403819"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_bbb95a6d-e95b-4726-87c3-fb52484bcde0.jpg?v=1502403819","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jack Kenealy\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 548, Protecting Contractor Remedies\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Statutory Overview and Definitions, 1pm to 120 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Mechanics Liens 120 pm to 140 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Stop Notices for Private and Public Works 140 pm to 2pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the differences between private and public stop notices\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn in which type of actions are attorneys fees and interest available as remedies to the prevailing party\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand when a summary procedure is available\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJack Kenealy is an attorney in Woodland, California specializing in Contractor Law\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":425442335,"title":"Course #516- Labor Law: Conflict of Law in Labor and Discrimination Casework - webinar","handle":"course-516-labor-law-conflict-of-law-in-labor-and-discrimination-casework-mcle-credits-webinar","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: David Axelrod, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 516\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Review of current trends in labor, employment, discrimination, and civil rights law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. State and federal law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. significant statutory and case-law authorities\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze interface and interplay between various areas of state and federal law\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify overlaps and conflicts of laws and legal jurisdictions\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eDavid Axelrod, B.S., J.D., Attorney at Law, graduated from the University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law, 1988. He has been a practicing attorney and member of the California State Bar since 1988.\u003c\/em\u003e","published_at":"2014-12-30T15:37:00-08:00","created_at":"2014-12-30T15:37:21-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43562057868,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 516","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #516- Labor Law: Conflict of Law in Labor and Discrimination Casework - webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d524b2e0-273b-4722-a937-1c451b75e9e6.jpg?v=1502388217"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d524b2e0-273b-4722-a937-1c451b75e9e6.jpg?v=1502388217","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":11674091599,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d524b2e0-273b-4722-a937-1c451b75e9e6.jpg?v=1502388217"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d524b2e0-273b-4722-a937-1c451b75e9e6.jpg?v=1502388217","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: David Axelrod, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 516\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Review of current trends in labor, employment, discrimination, and civil rights law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. State and federal law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. significant statutory and case-law authorities\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze interface and interplay between various areas of state and federal law\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify overlaps and conflicts of laws and legal jurisdictions\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eDavid Axelrod, B.S., J.D., Attorney at Law, graduated from the University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law, 1988. He has been a practicing attorney and member of the California State Bar since 1988.\u003c\/em\u003e"}