Single Course

{"id":309727371,"title":"Course #306- Bias: How To Do A Sexual Harassment Investigation - CD","handle":"course-306-bias-how-to-do-a-sexual-harassment-investigation-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 306\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTen years ago, the EEOC issued a policy on sexual harassment. This discussion will present the EEOC's advice and offer suggestions for conducting investigations, based on the case law. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to investigate complaints of sexual harassment under the EEOC policy\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to investigate other types of discrimination and harassment: race, age, disability, and religion, as well as the differences between each\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:47:45-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T13:47:45-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","elimination-of-bias","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43596472012,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 306","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #306- Bias: How To Do A Sexual Harassment Investigation - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412126799,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_1a24fbab-050f-45e1-b408-ee983727ac89.jpg?v=1502487957","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 306\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTen years ago, the EEOC issued a policy on sexual harassment. This discussion will present the EEOC's advice and offer suggestions for conducting investigations, based on the case law. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to investigate complaints of sexual harassment under the EEOC policy\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to investigate other types of discrimination and harassment: race, age, disability, and religion, as well as the differences between each\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11517461964,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:21:57-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660272460,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442203963471,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11517464972,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:22:21-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660277196,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442204192847,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":309732863,"title":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - CD","handle":"course-337-meacham-v-knolls-atomic-power-lab-labor-law-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:09:48-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:09:48-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659852044,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 338","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412651087,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_9036de87-ddfd-45d0-99f3-eea57717d6b7.jpg?v=1502734233","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11517409356,"title":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - MP3","handle":"course-338-chamber-of-commerce-v-brown-labor-law-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:09:48-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:12:58-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659973836,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 338","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442203177039,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":309740919,"title":"Course #418- Leaves of Absences in California - CD","handle":"course-418-leave-of-absences-in-california-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Robert Rediger\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 418\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen an employee asks you for time off, are you aware of the various required leaves of absence? This course covers all leaves required by laws and those leaves employers commonly give employees and strategies for handling leave requests.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Leaves of Absence required by law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Leaves of Absence an Employer may commit to in its employee handbook and\/or by agreeing to such in a collective Bargaining Agreement with a Labor Organization\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Strategies for Handling Employee Leave of Absence Requests and Recommended changes to Existing Policies.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to write an employee handbook to include all the necessary and preferred leaves of absence\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand what a collective bargain is\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRobert Rediger is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at Rediger McHugh LLP. He focuses his practice on Labor, Employment, and Class Action Defense.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:30:20-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:30:20-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","office-management","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43508716748,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 418","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #418- Leaves of Absences in California - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_d40a3458-7b29-46c2-bb87-37cc23069bd6.jpg?v=1502233752"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_d40a3458-7b29-46c2-bb87-37cc23069bd6.jpg?v=1502233752","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5413306447,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.25,"height":819,"width":1024,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_d40a3458-7b29-46c2-bb87-37cc23069bd6.jpg?v=1502233752"},"aspect_ratio":1.25,"height":819,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_d40a3458-7b29-46c2-bb87-37cc23069bd6.jpg?v=1502233752","width":1024}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Robert Rediger\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 418\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen an employee asks you for time off, are you aware of the various required leaves of absence? This course covers all leaves required by laws and those leaves employers commonly give employees and strategies for handling leave requests.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Leaves of Absence required by law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Leaves of Absence an Employer may commit to in its employee handbook and\/or by agreeing to such in a collective Bargaining Agreement with a Labor Organization\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Strategies for Handling Employee Leave of Absence Requests and Recommended changes to Existing Policies.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to write an employee handbook to include all the necessary and preferred leaves of absence\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand what a collective bargain is\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRobert Rediger is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at Rediger McHugh LLP. He focuses his practice on Labor, Employment, and Class Action Defense.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":309741099,"title":"Course #419- How to Discipline and Discharge an Employee - CD","handle":"course-419-how-to-discipline-and-discharge-an-employee-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Robert Rediger\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 419\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers all the legal procedures for discipline and discharge.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Putting Legal Procedures for Discipline and Discharge in Place\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Decision to Discipline or Discharge and Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Safeguards an Employer Should take when Discharging an Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. The Logistics of Informing an Employee of their Discharge\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Post Discharge Matters Every Employer must Anticipate\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the importance of a streamlined hiring process and well-written employee handbook\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to best communicate - verbal warnings, constructive criticism, counseling\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to tie up loose ends after the employee is discharged - regarding future employers, workers compensation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eRobert Rediger is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at Rediger McHugh LLP. He focuses his practice on Labor, Employment, and Class Action Defense.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:31:12-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:31:12-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","office-management","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43507893324,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 419","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #419- How to Discipline and Discharge an Employee - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger.jpg?v=1502232750"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger.jpg?v=1502232750","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5413339215,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.25,"height":819,"width":1024,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger.jpg?v=1502232750"},"aspect_ratio":1.25,"height":819,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger.jpg?v=1502232750","width":1024}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Robert Rediger\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 419\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers all the legal procedures for discipline and discharge.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Putting Legal Procedures for Discipline and Discharge in Place\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Decision to Discipline or Discharge and Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Safeguards an Employer Should take when Discharging an Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. The Logistics of Informing an Employee of their Discharge\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Post Discharge Matters Every Employer must Anticipate\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the importance of a streamlined hiring process and well-written employee handbook\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to best communicate - verbal warnings, constructive criticism, counseling\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to tie up loose ends after the employee is discharged - regarding future employers, workers compensation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eRobert Rediger is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at Rediger McHugh LLP. He focuses his practice on Labor, Employment, and Class Action Defense.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11495720012,"title":"Course #419- How to Discipline and Discharge an Employee - MP3","handle":"course-419-how-to-discipline-and-discharge-an-employee-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Robert Rediger\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 419\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers all the legal procedures for discipline and discharge.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Putting Legal Procedures for Discipline and Discharge in Place\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Decision to Discipline or Discharge and Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Safeguards an Employer Should take when Discharging an Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. The Logistics of Informing an Employee of their Discharge\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Post Discharge Matters Every Employer must Anticipate\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the importance of a streamlined hiring process and well-written employee handbook\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to best communicate - verbal warnings, constructive criticism, counseling\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to tie up loose ends after the employee is discharged - regarding future employers, workers compensation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eRobert Rediger is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at Rediger McHugh LLP. He focuses his practice on Labor, Employment, and Class Action Defense.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:31:12-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-09T13:30:15-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","mp3","office-management","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43539791756,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 419","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #419- How to Discipline and Discharge an Employee - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_248a5cb0-5e10-4d87-9483-7f4f5244e825.jpg?v=1502310616"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_248a5cb0-5e10-4d87-9483-7f4f5244e825.jpg?v=1502310616","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":438444425295,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.25,"height":819,"width":1024,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_248a5cb0-5e10-4d87-9483-7f4f5244e825.jpg?v=1502310616"},"aspect_ratio":1.25,"height":819,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Robert_Rediger_248a5cb0-5e10-4d87-9483-7f4f5244e825.jpg?v=1502310616","width":1024}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Robert Rediger\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 419\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers all the legal procedures for discipline and discharge.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Putting Legal Procedures for Discipline and Discharge in Place\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Decision to Discipline or Discharge and Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Safeguards an Employer Should take when Discharging an Employee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. The Logistics of Informing an Employee of their Discharge\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Post Discharge Matters Every Employer must Anticipate\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the importance of a streamlined hiring process and well-written employee handbook\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to best communicate - verbal warnings, constructive criticism, counseling\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to tie up loose ends after the employee is discharged - regarding future employers, workers compensation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cem\u003eRobert Rediger is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at Rediger McHugh LLP. He focuses his practice on Labor, Employment, and Class Action Defense.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":309743019,"title":"Course #427- Ethics: Disabilities Under the ADA and the FEHA - CD","handle":"course-427-ethics-disabilities-under-the-ada-and-the-feha-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 427\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the difficulties of employment law is that it is constantly changing. This presentation will aid practitioners by providing a basic outline for analyzing the most common employment laws. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Analytical Outline for popular employment laws\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Wrongful Termination Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Protected classes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the four most commonly used federal employment statues\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the two types of discrimination\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain a \"hostile work environment\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:01-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:01-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","disability-social-security-law","discrimination-harassment","ethics","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43532441036,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 427","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #427- Ethics: Disabilities Under the ADA and the FEHA - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5413535823,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_487ba7e2-4fc3-4f9d-81df-b3658ca934ad.jpg?v=1502300434","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 427\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the difficulties of employment law is that it is constantly changing. This presentation will aid practitioners by providing a basic outline for analyzing the most common employment laws. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Analytical Outline for popular employment laws\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Wrongful Termination Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Protected classes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the four most commonly used federal employment statues\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the two types of discrimination\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain a \"hostile work environment\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11495183948,"title":"Course #427- Ethics: Disabilities Under the ADA and the FEHA - MP3","handle":"course-427-ethics-disabilities-under-the-ada-and-the-feha-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 427\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the difficulties of employment law is that it is constantly changing. This presentation will aid practitioners by providing a basic outline for analyzing the most common employment laws. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Analytical Outline for popular employment laws\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Wrongful Termination Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Protected classes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the four most commonly used federal employment statues\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the two types of discrimination\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain a \"hostile work environment\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:01-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-09T10:42:30-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","disability-social-security-law","discrimination-harassment","ethics","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43532653964,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 427","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #427- Ethics: Disabilities Under the ADA and the FEHA - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-2,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_504e294e-ab2f-4a42-b796-e754b29c39b0.jpg?v=1502300550"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_504e294e-ab2f-4a42-b796-e754b29c39b0.jpg?v=1502300550","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":438315548751,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_504e294e-ab2f-4a42-b796-e754b29c39b0.jpg?v=1502300550"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_504e294e-ab2f-4a42-b796-e754b29c39b0.jpg?v=1502300550","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jordan Tonya Louise Peters\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 427\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the difficulties of employment law is that it is constantly changing. This presentation will aid practitioners by providing a basic outline for analyzing the most common employment laws. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Analytical Outline for popular employment laws\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Wrongful Termination Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Protected classes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the four most commonly used federal employment statues\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the two types of discrimination\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain a \"hostile work environment\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJordan Peters is an attorney and professor at CSU Sacramento, California. She focuses her practice on workplace harassment, discrimination, and employment law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":413615395,"title":"Course #505- Labor and Employment Law in Review - webinar","handle":"copy-of-course-505-webinar-labor-and-employment-law-in-review-view-at-www-aaroncle-com","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jayson Javitz, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 505\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Update of Key Supreme Court Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Update of Key Legislation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. 5 cases of Legislative Promulgation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze each of the cases mentioned\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain when current employees begin to accrue sick leave\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how much constitutes \"reasonable advance notification\" regarding sick leave\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJayson Javitz is Director and General Counsel of River City Petroleum.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-11-26T16:36:00-08:00","created_at":"2014-11-26T16:36:37-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":1000066835,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 505","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #505- Labor and Employment Law in Review - webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_bc64c7a8-5bb0-4646-a745-3868c812b4a2.jpg?v=1502320187"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_bc64c7a8-5bb0-4646-a745-3868c812b4a2.jpg?v=1502320187","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":10894344271,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.842,"height":600,"width":505,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_bc64c7a8-5bb0-4646-a745-3868c812b4a2.jpg?v=1502320187"},"aspect_ratio":0.842,"height":600,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_bc64c7a8-5bb0-4646-a745-3868c812b4a2.jpg?v=1502320187","width":505}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jayson Javitz, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 505\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Update of Key Supreme Court Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Update of Key Legislation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. 5 cases of Legislative Promulgation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze each of the cases mentioned\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain when current employees begin to accrue sick leave\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how much constitutes \"reasonable advance notification\" regarding sick leave\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJayson Javitz is Director and General Counsel of River City Petroleum.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":413620855,"title":"Course #506- Supreme Court Cases: Labor and Employment Law in Review - webinar","handle":"copy-of-copy-of-course-506-webinar-labor-and-employment-law-in-review-view-at-www-aaroncle-com","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jayson Javitz, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 506\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Update of Key Supreme Court Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Update of Key Legislation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. 5 cases of Legislative Promulgation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the different cases mentioned\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand all the parts of the Paid Sick Leave Law and identify which cases involved this legislation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJayson Javitz is Director and General Counsel of River City Petroleum.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-11-26T16:47:00-08:00","created_at":"2014-11-26T16:47:27-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":1000075379,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 506","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #506- Supreme Court Cases: Labor and Employment Law in Review - webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_ab0620ca-10a9-4eba-8d18-f9de08c0acc9.jpg?v=1502320458"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_ab0620ca-10a9-4eba-8d18-f9de08c0acc9.jpg?v=1502320458","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":10894475343,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.842,"height":600,"width":505,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_ab0620ca-10a9-4eba-8d18-f9de08c0acc9.jpg?v=1502320458"},"aspect_ratio":0.842,"height":600,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_ab0620ca-10a9-4eba-8d18-f9de08c0acc9.jpg?v=1502320458","width":505}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jayson Javitz, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 506\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Update of Key Supreme Court Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Update of Key Legislation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. 5 cases of Legislative Promulgation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the different cases mentioned\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand all the parts of the Paid Sick Leave Law and identify which cases involved this legislation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJayson Javitz is Director and General Counsel of River City Petroleum.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}