MP3

{"id":11517365644,"title":"Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - MP3","handle":"course-336-munaf-v-geren-habeas-corpus-and-the-military-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 336\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.facts_of_the_case\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv ng-bind-html=\"case.facts_of_the_case\" class=\"ng-binding\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer. After the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eHirota v. MacArthur\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion: Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/section\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.question\"\u003e\u003c\/section\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:08:28-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:04:11-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659634124,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 336","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442202980431,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 336\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.facts_of_the_case\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv ng-bind-html=\"case.facts_of_the_case\" class=\"ng-binding\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer. After the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eHirota v. MacArthur\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion: Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/section\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.question\"\u003e\u003c\/section\u003e"}

{"id":11517302604,"title":"Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - MP3","handle":"course-335-tory-v-cochran-a-free-speech-issue-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 335\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state court, arguing the order violated his First Amendment right to free speech. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Cochran died one week after oral argument.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid a judge's order that someone stop making defaming statements about a public figure, even after that figure's death, violate the First Amendment right to free speech?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was that question answered by the court? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:06:48-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T10:51:55-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659455884,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 335","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442202095695,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 335\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state court, arguing the order violated his First Amendment right to free speech. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Cochran died one week after oral argument.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid a judge's order that someone stop making defaming statements about a public figure, even after that figure's death, violate the First Amendment right to free speech?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was that question answered by the court? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":310383663,"title":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court - 1 Hour MP3","handle":"course-334-boumediene-v-bush-guantanimo-or-u-s-court-1-hour-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse# 334: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBoumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTHE SUPREME COURT\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2002 Lakhdar Boumediene and five other Algerian natives were seized by Bosnian police when U.S. intelligence officers suspected their involvement in a plot to attack the U.S. embassy there. The U.S. government classified the men as enemy combatants in the war on terror and detained them at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, which is located on land that the U.S. leases from Cuba. Boumediene filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging violations of the Constitution's Due Process Clause, various statutes and treaties, the common law, and international law. The District Court judge granted the government's motion to have all of the claims dismissed on the ground that Boumediene, as an alien detained at an overseas military base, had no right to a habeas petition. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal but the Supreme Court reversed in Rasul v. Bush, which held that the habeas statute extends to non-citizen detainees at Guantanamo.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2006, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA). The Act eliminates federal courts' jurisdiction to hear habeas applications from detainees who have been designated (according to procedures established in the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005) as enemy combatants. When the case was appealed to the D.C. Circuit for the second time, the detainees argued that the MCA did not apply to their petitions, and that if it did, it was unconstitutional under the Suspension Clause. The Suspension Clause reads: \"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the government on both points. It cited language in the MCA applying the law to \"all cases, without exception\" that pertain to aspects of detention. One of the purposes of the MCA, according to the Circuit Court, was to overrule the Supreme Court's opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which had allowed petitions like Boumediene's to go forward. The D.C. Circuit held that the Suspension Clause only protects the writ of habeas corpus as it existed in 1789, and that the writ would not have been understood in 1789 to apply to an overseas military base leased from a foreign government. Constitutional rights do not apply to aliens outside of the United States, the court held, and the leased military base in Cuba does not qualify as inside the geographic borders of the U.S. In a rare reversal, the Supreme Court granted certiorari after initially denying review three months earlier.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA five-justice majority answered yes to each of these questions. The opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated that if the MCA is considered valid its legislative history requires that the detainees' cases be dismissed. However, the Court went on to state that because the procedures laid out in the Detainee Treatment Act are not adequate substitutes for the habeas writ, the MCA operates as an unconstitutional suspension of that writ. The detainees were not barred from seeking habeas or invoking the Suspension Clause merely because they had been designated as enemy combatants or held at Guantanamo Bay. The Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's ruling and found in favor of the detainees. Justice David H. Souter concurred in the judgment. Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia filed separate dissenting opinions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecisions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecision: 5 votes for Boumediene, 4 vote(s) against\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLegal provision: Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 2: Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus    \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-18T23:08:33-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-18T23:08:33-07:00","vendor":"clelaw","type":"MP3","tags":["clelaw","mp3"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":720627035,"title":"Course #334: Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court - 1 Hour","option1":"Course #334: Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court - 1 Hour","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 334 MP3","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court - 1 Hour MP3 - Course #334: Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court - 1 Hour","public_title":"Course #334: Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court - 1 Hour","options":["Course #334: Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court - 1 Hour"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/2_d5e2c587-e501-4e5f-bd30-d601143296ec.jpg?v=1509559035"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/2_d5e2c587-e501-4e5f-bd30-d601143296ec.jpg?v=1509559035","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5436276815,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":400,"width":600,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/2_d5e2c587-e501-4e5f-bd30-d601143296ec.jpg?v=1509559035"},"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":400,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/2_d5e2c587-e501-4e5f-bd30-d601143296ec.jpg?v=1509559035","width":600}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse# 334: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBoumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Court \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTHE SUPREME COURT\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2002 Lakhdar Boumediene and five other Algerian natives were seized by Bosnian police when U.S. intelligence officers suspected their involvement in a plot to attack the U.S. embassy there. The U.S. government classified the men as enemy combatants in the war on terror and detained them at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, which is located on land that the U.S. leases from Cuba. Boumediene filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging violations of the Constitution's Due Process Clause, various statutes and treaties, the common law, and international law. The District Court judge granted the government's motion to have all of the claims dismissed on the ground that Boumediene, as an alien detained at an overseas military base, had no right to a habeas petition. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal but the Supreme Court reversed in Rasul v. Bush, which held that the habeas statute extends to non-citizen detainees at Guantanamo.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2006, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA). The Act eliminates federal courts' jurisdiction to hear habeas applications from detainees who have been designated (according to procedures established in the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005) as enemy combatants. When the case was appealed to the D.C. Circuit for the second time, the detainees argued that the MCA did not apply to their petitions, and that if it did, it was unconstitutional under the Suspension Clause. The Suspension Clause reads: \"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the government on both points. It cited language in the MCA applying the law to \"all cases, without exception\" that pertain to aspects of detention. One of the purposes of the MCA, according to the Circuit Court, was to overrule the Supreme Court's opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which had allowed petitions like Boumediene's to go forward. The D.C. Circuit held that the Suspension Clause only protects the writ of habeas corpus as it existed in 1789, and that the writ would not have been understood in 1789 to apply to an overseas military base leased from a foreign government. Constitutional rights do not apply to aliens outside of the United States, the court held, and the leased military base in Cuba does not qualify as inside the geographic borders of the U.S. In a rare reversal, the Supreme Court granted certiorari after initially denying review three months earlier.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA five-justice majority answered yes to each of these questions. The opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated that if the MCA is considered valid its legislative history requires that the detainees' cases be dismissed. However, the Court went on to state that because the procedures laid out in the Detainee Treatment Act are not adequate substitutes for the habeas writ, the MCA operates as an unconstitutional suspension of that writ. The detainees were not barred from seeking habeas or invoking the Suspension Clause merely because they had been designated as enemy combatants or held at Guantanamo Bay. The Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's ruling and found in favor of the detainees. Justice David H. Souter concurred in the judgment. Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia filed separate dissenting opinions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecisions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecision: 5 votes for Boumediene, 4 vote(s) against\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLegal provision: Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 2: Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus    \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11517162572,"title":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - MP3","handle":"course-334-boumediene-v-bush-guantanamo-or-u-s-court-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:00:23-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T10:42:32-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["advanced","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659312012,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 334","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442201178191,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11516979660,"title":"Course #331- Projects Gone Bad and The Litigation That Follows - MP3","handle":"course-331-projects-gone-bad-and-the-litigation-that-follows-mp3","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Christopher J. Bakes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 331\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Learn how to adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people, and the right drafting priorities\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChristopher J. Bakes is a partnering attorney at Lewis Brisbois LLP in Sacramento, California. He specializes in construction and commercial litigation. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:59:40-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T10:05:43-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["construction-law","contract-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43658782028,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 331","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #331- Projects Gone Bad and The Litigation That Follows - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_cdb994b0-ce60-4970-8292-2f54c72d3b82.jpg?v=1502730343"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_cdb994b0-ce60-4970-8292-2f54c72d3b82.jpg?v=1502730343","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442198294607,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.667,"height":330,"width":220,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_cdb994b0-ce60-4970-8292-2f54c72d3b82.jpg?v=1502730343"},"aspect_ratio":0.667,"height":330,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_cdb994b0-ce60-4970-8292-2f54c72d3b82.jpg?v=1502730343","width":220}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Christopher J. Bakes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 331\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Learn how to adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people, and the right drafting priorities\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChristopher J. Bakes is a partnering attorney at Lewis Brisbois LLP in Sacramento, California. He specializes in construction and commercial litigation. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e"}

{"id":11516920972,"title":"Course #330- Construction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents - MP3","handle":"course-330-construction-contracts-aia-vs-consensus-documents-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Christopher J. Bakes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 330\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Learn how to adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people, and the right drafting priorities\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChristopher J. Bakes is a partnering attorney at Lewis Brisbois LLP in Sacramento, California. He specializes in construction and commercial litigation. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:58:57-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T09:50:14-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["construction-law","contract-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43658571852,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 330","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #330- Construction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_6210ae0d-f9dd-4a94-b21f-1dc05b3ab955.jpg?v=1502729415"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_6210ae0d-f9dd-4a94-b21f-1dc05b3ab955.jpg?v=1502729415","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442197278799,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.667,"height":330,"width":220,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_6210ae0d-f9dd-4a94-b21f-1dc05b3ab955.jpg?v=1502729415"},"aspect_ratio":0.667,"height":330,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Bakes_Christopher_6210ae0d-f9dd-4a94-b21f-1dc05b3ab955.jpg?v=1502729415","width":220}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Christopher J. Bakes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 330\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Learn how to adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people, and the right drafting priorities\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChristopher J. Bakes is a partnering attorney at Lewis Brisbois LLP in Sacramento, California. He specializes in construction and commercial litigation. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11516856012,"title":"Course #320- How You Can Win With Post Trial Motions - MP3","handle":"course-320-how-you-can-win-with-post-trial-motions-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Stephen Beede\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 320\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe long jury trial has now come to an end and your worst fears are realized as the jury renders a verdict that hammers your client.  What to do? \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn about Motion for a New Trial and Motion for Judgment notwithstanding the verdict\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how and when one can use these post trial, and the advantages of using them over an appeal\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAttorney Stephen Beede is the Founder of BPE Law Group, P.C. with offices in Gold River and Lincoln, California. The firm provides advice and representation for clients in Real Estate, Business, and Estate Planning.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:58:15-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T09:29:08-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","intermediate","mp3","single-course","trial-skills"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43658286732,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 320","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #320- How You Can Win With Post Trial Motions - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_62814f69-e8cd-4be8-ab95-528697adcb3c.jpg?v=1502728148"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_62814f69-e8cd-4be8-ab95-528697adcb3c.jpg?v=1502728148","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442196066383,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.703,"height":600,"width":422,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_62814f69-e8cd-4be8-ab95-528697adcb3c.jpg?v=1502728148"},"aspect_ratio":0.703,"height":600,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/stephenbeede_62814f69-e8cd-4be8-ab95-528697adcb3c.jpg?v=1502728148","width":422}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Stephen Beede\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 320\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe long jury trial has now come to an end and your worst fears are realized as the jury renders a verdict that hammers your client.  What to do? \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn about Motion for a New Trial and Motion for Judgment notwithstanding the verdict\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how and when one can use these post trial, and the advantages of using them over an appeal\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAttorney Stephen Beede is the Founder of BPE Law Group, P.C. with offices in Gold River and Lincoln, California. The firm provides advice and representation for clients in Real Estate, Business, and Estate Planning.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11516829708,"title":"Course #319- Estate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2 - MP3","handle":"course-319-estate-plans-the-grand-tour-of-complex-issues-part-2-mp3","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jack Johal\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 319\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence. Jack will take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to to do them right the first time.   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the differences between Federal Estate and Gift Tax, Income Tax, and Property Tax\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how state probate law will affect estate and tax planning\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze ERISA and understand what it created\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJack Johal is an business, tax, and estate planning attorney in Sacramento, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:56:46-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T09:14:41-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","tax-law","wills-trusts-estates"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43658091020,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 318","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #319- Estate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2 - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_55533952-beda-4cd8-88a0-5ad59b74052c.jpg?v=1502727281"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_55533952-beda-4cd8-88a0-5ad59b74052c.jpg?v=1502727281","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442195411023,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.498,"height":267,"width":400,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_55533952-beda-4cd8-88a0-5ad59b74052c.jpg?v=1502727281"},"aspect_ratio":1.498,"height":267,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_55533952-beda-4cd8-88a0-5ad59b74052c.jpg?v=1502727281","width":400}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jack Johal\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 319\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence. Jack will take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to to do them right the first time.   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the differences between Federal Estate and Gift Tax, Income Tax, and Property Tax\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how state probate law will affect estate and tax planning\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze ERISA and understand what it created\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJack Johal is an business, tax, and estate planning attorney in Sacramento, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11506572812,"title":"Course #318- Estate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1 - MP3","handle":"course-318-estate-plans-the-grand-tour-of-complex-issues-part-1-mp3","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jack Johal\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 318\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence. Jack will take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to to do them right the first time.   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the differences between Federal Estate and Gift Tax, Income Tax, and Property Tax\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how state probate law will affect estate and tax planning\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze ERISA and understand what it created\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJack Johal is an business, tax, and estate planning attorney in Sacramento, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:56:46-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-11T17:26:23-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","tax-law","wills-trusts-estates"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43598664140,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 318","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #318- Estate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1 - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_cda0089c-ca5f-4998-b2b1-6c4c64b21d7d.jpg?v=1502497584"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_cda0089c-ca5f-4998-b2b1-6c4c64b21d7d.jpg?v=1502497584","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":440284708943,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.498,"height":267,"width":400,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_cda0089c-ca5f-4998-b2b1-6c4c64b21d7d.jpg?v=1502497584"},"aspect_ratio":1.498,"height":267,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/jackjohal_cda0089c-ca5f-4998-b2b1-6c4c64b21d7d.jpg?v=1502497584","width":400}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jack Johal\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 318\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence. Jack will take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to to do them right the first time.   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the differences between Federal Estate and Gift Tax, Income Tax, and Property Tax\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how state probate law will affect estate and tax planning\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze ERISA and understand what it created\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJack Johal is an business, tax, and estate planning attorney in Sacramento, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11506492684,"title":"Course #317- When, Why and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation - MP3","handle":"course-317-when-why-and-how-to-use-a-trial-bifurcation-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: John Haluck\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 317\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe practice of bifurcating a case has its advantages.  It can accelerate a resolution of one aspect of the case while providing an opportunity for the court to resolve the overall case, thus making it conducive to expedition and economy.  Thus allowing the court to order a separate trial of any cause of action…. or any separate issue or any number of causes of action or issues.  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn when and how you should bifurcate a case\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand what options the court has available after the bifurcation of a case and how to deal with each \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJohn Haluck is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at the Law Offices of Koeller Nebeker Carlson and Haluck. He specializes in business and employment litigation.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:56:00-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-11T16:59:21-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","intermediate","mp3","single-course","trial-skills"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43598304332,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 317","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #317- When, Why and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_dca8b775-483a-4899-9173-f98485022da0.jpg?v=1502495961"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_dca8b775-483a-4899-9173-f98485022da0.jpg?v=1502495961","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":440269340751,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_dca8b775-483a-4899-9173-f98485022da0.jpg?v=1502495961"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_dca8b775-483a-4899-9173-f98485022da0.jpg?v=1502495961","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: John Haluck\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 317\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe practice of bifurcating a case has its advantages.  It can accelerate a resolution of one aspect of the case while providing an opportunity for the court to resolve the overall case, thus making it conducive to expedition and economy.  Thus allowing the court to order a separate trial of any cause of action…. or any separate issue or any number of causes of action or issues.  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn when and how you should bifurcate a case\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand what options the court has available after the bifurcation of a case and how to deal with each \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJohn Haluck is an attorney in Sacramento, California, at the Law Offices of Koeller Nebeker Carlson and Haluck. He specializes in business and employment litigation.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":309728563,"title":"Course #314- How The North American Union Affects Your Law Practice - MP3","handle":"course-314-how-will-the-north-american-union-effect-your-law-practice-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Hector de Avila Gonzáles\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 314\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Description and background of the North American Union\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Precedents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. European Union\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. North American Free Trade Agreement\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Security and prosperity partnership of North America\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6. Real, economic and legal impediments for the Union\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the legal and economic impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn the legal implications of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the impediments for a union in North America\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHector de Avila Gonzáles is an attorney in Sacramento, California. He specializes in Mexican Law, with an international, multicultural and cross border approach.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:53:19-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T13:53:19-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","international-law","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43597597196,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 314","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #314- How The North American Union Affects Your Law Practice - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_8b0c36f0-16fa-427f-97fd-d44d2b939e06.jpg?v=1502492480"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_8b0c36f0-16fa-427f-97fd-d44d2b939e06.jpg?v=1502492480","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412290639,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_8b0c36f0-16fa-427f-97fd-d44d2b939e06.jpg?v=1502492480"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_8b0c36f0-16fa-427f-97fd-d44d2b939e06.jpg?v=1502492480","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Hector de Avila Gonzáles\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 314\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Description and background of the North American Union\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Precedents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. European Union\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. North American Free Trade Agreement\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Security and prosperity partnership of North America\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6. Real, economic and legal impediments for the Union\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the legal and economic impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn the legal implications of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the impediments for a union in North America\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHector de Avila Gonzáles is an attorney in Sacramento, California. He specializes in Mexican Law, with an international, multicultural and cross border approach.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11506296780,"title":"Course #313- Winning a Personal Injury Case - MP3","handle":"course-313-winning-a-personal-injury-case-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDavid Asch\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 313\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid Asch shares advice from his 20 years of experience in the personal injury field.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn what to do when your client has no auto insurance and the effects of under-insured motorists on your client\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand what a conflict of interest agreement is and how it can protect you and your client\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to fill out the proper forms and how to avoid problems\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003eDavid Asch is a graduate of UC Davis and the UOP McGeorge School of Law. He has been practicing for 28 years and specializes in personal injury law, medical malpractice, elder neglect\/abuse, and civil litigation.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T13:52:32-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-11T15:53:58-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["beginner","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","mp3","personal-injury-and-negligence","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43597504652,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 527","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #313- Winning a Personal Injury Case - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/davidasch_11bf2fd1-a503-4017-ae62-9197e4259529.jpg?v=1502492040"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/davidasch_11bf2fd1-a503-4017-ae62-9197e4259529.jpg?v=1502492040","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":440222351439,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.056,"height":568,"width":600,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/davidasch_11bf2fd1-a503-4017-ae62-9197e4259529.jpg?v=1502492040"},"aspect_ratio":1.056,"height":568,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/davidasch_11bf2fd1-a503-4017-ae62-9197e4259529.jpg?v=1502492040","width":600}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDavid Asch\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 313\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid Asch shares advice from his 20 years of experience in the personal injury field.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn what to do when your client has no auto insurance and the effects of under-insured motorists on your client\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand what a conflict of interest agreement is and how it can protect you and your client\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to fill out the proper forms and how to avoid problems\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003eDavid Asch is a graduate of UC Davis and the UOP McGeorge School of Law. He has been practicing for 28 years and specializes in personal injury law, medical malpractice, elder neglect\/abuse, and civil litigation.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}