Vermont

Sort by:
{"id":309714471,"title":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 345 SERIES","handle":"26-unit-cle-bundle-345-series","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBundle 345 Series\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hours of MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eSubstance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent?\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e277\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEffective Estate and Tax Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e302\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEssential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e303\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e304\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCritical Essentials of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e305\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to do a Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e306\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Use Government Benefits to Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e307\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Techniques for Cross Examination During Trial\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e308\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAdministrative Law: Honing Your Skills for Trial Prepartations\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e311\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e313\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e315\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e316\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWhen, Why, and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e317\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e318\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e319\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow You Can Win with Post Trial Motions\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e320\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e330\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: Projects Gone Bad and the Litigation that Follows\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e331\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Boumediene vs. Bush, Guantanamo or US Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e334\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Tory vs. Cochran, A Free Speech Issue\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e335\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Munaf vs. Green, Habeus Corpus, and the Military\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e336\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Meacham vs. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e337\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Chamber of Commerce vs. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e338\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy Tax Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e339\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e341\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T12:47:00-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T12:47:22-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["administrative-law","bankruptcy-restructuring","bundle-course","cds","competence-issues","constitutional-law","construction-law","contract-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","office-management","personal-injury-and-negligence","privacy-cybersecurity","substance-abuse","supreme-court","tax-law","technology","trial-skills","wills-trusts-estates"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43668873420,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"26 Unit - 345 SERIES","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 345 SERIES","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":67,"inventory_management":"shopify","inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5411602511,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":1333,"width":2000,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165"},"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":1333,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165","width":2000}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBundle 345 Series\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hours of MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eSubstance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent?\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e277\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEffective Estate and Tax Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e302\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEssential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e303\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e304\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCritical Essentials of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e305\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to do a Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e306\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Use Government Benefits to Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e307\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Techniques for Cross Examination During Trial\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e308\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAdministrative Law: Honing Your Skills for Trial Prepartations\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e311\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e313\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e315\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e316\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWhen, Why, and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e317\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e318\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e319\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow You Can Win with Post Trial Motions\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e320\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e330\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: Projects Gone Bad and the Litigation that Follows\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e331\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Boumediene vs. Bush, Guantanamo or US Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e334\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Tory vs. Cochran, A Free Speech Issue\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e335\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Munaf vs. Green, Habeus Corpus, and the Military\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e336\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Meacham vs. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e337\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Chamber of Commerce vs. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e338\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy Tax Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e339\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e341\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e"}
26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 345 SERIES

26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 345 SERIES

$ 399.00

26 Hour CLE Package Includes  4 Ethics, 1 Competency/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias Bundle 345 Series 26 Hours of MCLE Credit Substance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent? 277 Effective Estate and Tax Planning 302 Essential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement 303   How to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case 304 Critical Essen...


More Info
{"id":463567163,"title":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 545 SERIES","handle":"copy-of-26-unit-cle-bundle-545-series","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e507\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026amp; Discrimination (Transgender)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e509\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e513\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHuman Trafficking\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e514\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSubstance Abuse \u0026amp; Legal Competence\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e515\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eLabor Law: Conflict in Labor \u0026amp; Discrimination Casework\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e516\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eReal Estate Law: Foreclosures \u0026amp; Short Sales\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e517\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCelebrity Confidentialty Agreements\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e519\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law: Conflicts in Mexican and US Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e520\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTrial Tactics in Limine to Closing in 50 minutes\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e521\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eA Judges View of Small Claims Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e522\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e524\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e525\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Ethical \u0026amp; Legal Implications of Ebola\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e526\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e527\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Business Litigation Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e528\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Felony Trials\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e529\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWorkers Compensation: Medical Care After SB863\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e530\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law, Post Conviction \u0026amp; Youth Offender Parole Hearings\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e531\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Claimant's Social Security Benefits\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e532\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Prosecutorial Misconduct\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e534\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpectrum of Mediation \u0026amp; Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e535\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpecial Needs Trusts(SNT)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e536\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e537\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eInsurance Law: An Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e538\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Supreme Court: Disabilities, ADA \u0026amp; FEHA Young vs. UPS\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e539\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-03-09T10:45:00-07:00","created_at":"2015-03-09T10:45:20-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["alternative-dispute-resolution","bankruptcy-restructuring","bias","bundle-course","business-corporate-securities-law","cds","civil-law","competence-issues","competency","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","criminal-law","disability-social-security-law","discrimination-harassment","elimination-of-bias","entertainment-law","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","general","insurance-law","intermediate","international-law","labor-employment-law","personal-injury-and-negligence","real-estate","substance-abuse","supreme-court","trial-skills","wills-trusts-estates","workers-compensation"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43668222732,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"26 Unit - 545 SERIES","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 545 SERIES","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-141,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":14352678991,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":2008,"width":3012,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413"},"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":2008,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413","width":3012}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e507\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026amp; Discrimination (Transgender)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e509\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e513\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHuman Trafficking\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e514\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSubstance Abuse \u0026amp; Legal Competence\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e515\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eLabor Law: Conflict in Labor \u0026amp; Discrimination Casework\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e516\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eReal Estate Law: Foreclosures \u0026amp; Short Sales\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e517\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCelebrity Confidentialty Agreements\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e519\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law: Conflicts in Mexican and US Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e520\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTrial Tactics in Limine to Closing in 50 minutes\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e521\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eA Judges View of Small Claims Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e522\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e524\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e525\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Ethical \u0026amp; Legal Implications of Ebola\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e526\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e527\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Business Litigation Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e528\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Felony Trials\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e529\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWorkers Compensation: Medical Care After SB863\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e530\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law, Post Conviction \u0026amp; Youth Offender Parole Hearings\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e531\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Claimant's Social Security Benefits\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e532\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Prosecutorial Misconduct\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e534\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpectrum of Mediation \u0026amp; Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e535\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpecial Needs Trusts(SNT)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e536\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e537\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eInsurance Law: An Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e538\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Supreme Court: Disabilities, ADA \u0026amp; FEHA Young vs. UPS\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e539\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}
26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 545 SERIES

26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 545 SERIES

$ 399.00

26 Hour CLE Package Includes  Ethics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View 507 Bias: Harassment, Retaliation & Discrimination (Transgender) 509 Bankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview 513   Human Trafficking 514 Substance Abuse & Legal Competence 515 Labor Law: Conflict in Labor & Discrimination Casework 516 Real Esta...


More Info
{"id":11518471884,"title":"26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 345 SERIES","handle":"26-unit-cle-mp3-bundle-345-series","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBundle 345 Series\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hours of MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"758\" height=\"667\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSubstance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent?\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e277\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEffective Estate and Tax Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e302\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEssential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e303\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 79.0312px;\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e304\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eCritical Essentials of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e305\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow to do a Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e306\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow to Use Government Benefits to Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e307\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eWinning Techniques for Cross Examination During Trial\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e308\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eAdministrative Law: Honing Your Skills for Trial Prepartations\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e311\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e313\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e315\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e316\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eWhen, Why, and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e317\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e318\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e319\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow You Can Win with Post Trial Motions\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e320\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eConstruction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e330\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eConstruction Contracts: Projects Gone Bad and the Litigation that Follows\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e331\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Boumediene vs. Bush, Guantanamo or US Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e334\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Tory vs. Cochran, A Free Speech Issue\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e335\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Munaf vs. Green, Habeus Corpus, and the Military\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e336\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Meacham vs. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e337\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Chamber of Commerce vs. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e338\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy Tax Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e339\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEthics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e341\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T12:47:00-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T15:19:13-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["administrative-law","bankruptcy-restructuring","competence-issues","constitutional-law","construction-law","contract-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","mp3","office-management","personal-injury-and-negligence","privacy-cybersecurity","substance-abuse","supreme-court","tax-law","technology","trial-skills","wills-trusts-estates"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43668993100,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"26 Unit - 345 SERIES","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 345 SERIES","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-47,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_00987610-670b-4bae-a6de-85c7a0b3adb3.png?v=1509557221"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_00987610-670b-4bae-a6de-85c7a0b3adb3.png?v=1509557221","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":657692360783,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.538,"height":390,"width":600,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_00987610-670b-4bae-a6de-85c7a0b3adb3.png?v=1509557221"},"aspect_ratio":1.538,"height":390,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_00987610-670b-4bae-a6de-85c7a0b3adb3.png?v=1509557221","width":600}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBundle 345 Series\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hours of MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"758\" height=\"667\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSubstance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent?\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e277\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEffective Estate and Tax Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e302\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEssential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e303\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 79.0312px;\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e304\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eCritical Essentials of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e305\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow to do a Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e306\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow to Use Government Benefits to Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e307\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eWinning Techniques for Cross Examination During Trial\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e308\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eAdministrative Law: Honing Your Skills for Trial Prepartations\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e311\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e313\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e315\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e316\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eWhen, Why, and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e317\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e318\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e319\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eHow You Can Win with Post Trial Motions\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e320\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eConstruction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e330\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eConstruction Contracts: Projects Gone Bad and the Litigation that Follows\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e331\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Boumediene vs. Bush, Guantanamo or US Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e334\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Tory vs. Cochran, A Free Speech Issue\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e335\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Munaf vs. Green, Habeus Corpus, and the Military\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e336\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Meacham vs. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e337\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: Chamber of Commerce vs. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e338\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eSupreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy Tax Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e339\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 679.031px;\"\u003eEthics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 61.0312px;\"\u003e341\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e"}
26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 345 SERIES

26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 345 SERIES

$ 399.00

26 Hour CLE Package Includes  4 Ethics, 1 Competency/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias Bundle 345 Series 26 Hours of MCLE Credit Substance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent? 277 Effective Estate and Tax Planning 302 Essential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement 303 How to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case 304 Critical Essent...


More Info
{"id":11518489868,"title":"26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 545 SERIES","handle":"26-unit-cle-mp3-bundle-545-series","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e507\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026amp; Discrimination (Transgender)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e509\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e513\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHuman Trafficking\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e514\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSubstance Abuse \u0026amp; Legal Competence\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e515\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eLabor Law: Conflict in Labor \u0026amp; Discrimination Casework\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e516\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eReal Estate Law: Foreclosures \u0026amp; Short Sales\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e517\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCelebrity Confidentialty Agreements\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e519\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law: Conflicts in Mexican and US Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e520\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTrial Tactics in Limine to Closing in 50 minutes\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e521\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eA Judges View of Small Claims Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e522\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e524\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e525\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Ethical \u0026amp; Legal Implications of Ebola\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e526\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e527\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Business Litigation Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e528\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Felony Trials\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e529\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWorkers Compensation: Medical Care After SB863\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e530\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law, Post Conviction \u0026amp; Youth Offender Parole Hearings\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e531\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Claimant's Social Security Benefits\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e532\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Prosecutorial Misconduct\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e534\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpectrum of Mediation \u0026amp; Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e535\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpecial Needs Trusts(SNT)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e536\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e537\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eInsurance Law: An Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e538\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Supreme Court: Disabilities, ADA \u0026amp; FEHA Young vs. UPS\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e539\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-03-09T10:45:00-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T15:25:40-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["alternative-dispute-resolution","bankruptcy-restructuring","business-corporate-securities-law","civil-law","competence-issues","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","criminal-law","disability-social-security-law","discrimination-harassment","elimination-of-bias","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","general","insurance-law","intermediate","international-law","labor-employment-law","mp3","personal-injury-and-negligence","real-estate","substance-abuse","supreme-court","trial-skills","wills-trusts-estates","workers-compensation"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43669095948,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"26 Unit - 545 SERIES","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 545 SERIES","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-136,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_bb6d18a1-044e-409a-816c-c57b817c0969.png?v=1509557360"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_bb6d18a1-044e-409a-816c-c57b817c0969.png?v=1509557360","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":657695965263,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.538,"height":390,"width":600,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_bb6d18a1-044e-409a-816c-c57b817c0969.png?v=1509557360"},"aspect_ratio":1.538,"height":390,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1_grande_bb6d18a1-044e-409a-816c-c57b817c0969.png?v=1509557360","width":600}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e507\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026amp; Discrimination (Transgender)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e509\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e513\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHuman Trafficking\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e514\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSubstance Abuse \u0026amp; Legal Competence\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e515\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eLabor Law: Conflict in Labor \u0026amp; Discrimination Casework\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e516\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eReal Estate Law: Foreclosures \u0026amp; Short Sales\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e517\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCelebrity Confidentialty Agreements\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e519\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law: Conflicts in Mexican and US Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e520\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTrial Tactics in Limine to Closing in 50 minutes\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e521\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eA Judges View of Small Claims Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e522\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e524\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e525\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Ethical \u0026amp; Legal Implications of Ebola\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e526\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e527\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Business Litigation Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e528\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Felony Trials\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e529\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWorkers Compensation: Medical Care After SB863\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e530\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law, Post Conviction \u0026amp; Youth Offender Parole Hearings\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e531\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Claimant's Social Security Benefits\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e532\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Prosecutorial Misconduct\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e534\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpectrum of Mediation \u0026amp; Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e535\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpecial Needs Trusts(SNT)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e536\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e537\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eInsurance Law: An Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e538\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Supreme Court: Disabilities, ADA \u0026amp; FEHA Young vs. UPS\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e539\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}
26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 545 SERIES

26 Unit CLE MP3 Bundle - 545 SERIES

$ 399.00

26 Hour CLE Package Includes  Ethics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View 507 Bias: Harassment, Retaliation & Discrimination (Transgender) 509 Bankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview 513   Human Trafficking 514 Substance Abuse & Legal Competence 515 Labor Law: Conflict in Labor & Discrimination Casework 516 Real Esta...


More Info
{"id":309730851,"title":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - CD","handle":"course-334-boumediene-v-bush-guantanimo-or-u-s-court-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:00:23-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:00:23-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["advanced","cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659295372,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 334","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412552783,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}
Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - CD

Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - CD

$ 59.00

Course 334 1 hour MCLE Credit Questions of the Case:   1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba? 2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Claus...


More Info
{"id":11517162572,"title":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - MP3","handle":"course-334-boumediene-v-bush-guantanamo-or-u-s-court-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:00:23-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T10:42:32-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["advanced","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659312012,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 334","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442201178191,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_a3c9ad70-c21b-46f7-ae6a-2747f0db76fc.jpg?v=1502732553","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}
Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - MP3

Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - MP3

$ 59.00

Course 334 1 hour MCLE Credit Questions of the Case:   1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba? 2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Claus...


More Info
{"id":309732323,"title":"Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - CD","handle":"course-335-tory-v-cochran-a-free-speech-issue-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 335\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state court, arguing the order violated his First Amendment right to free speech. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Cochran died one week after oral argument.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid a judge's order that someone stop making defaming statements about a public figure, even after that figure's death, violate the First Amendment right to free speech?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was that question answered by the court? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:06:48-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:06:48-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659420236,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 335","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_682aa5bd-c3c2-41d7-9ecf-85fc1333fd81.jpg?v=1502732986"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_682aa5bd-c3c2-41d7-9ecf-85fc1333fd81.jpg?v=1502732986","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412585551,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_682aa5bd-c3c2-41d7-9ecf-85fc1333fd81.jpg?v=1502732986"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_682aa5bd-c3c2-41d7-9ecf-85fc1333fd81.jpg?v=1502732986","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 335\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state court, arguing the order violated his First Amendment right to free speech. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Cochran died one week after oral argument.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid a judge's order that someone stop making defaming statements about a public figure, even after that figure's death, violate the First Amendment right to free speech?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was that question answered by the court? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}
Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - CD

Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - CD

$ 59.00

Course 335 1 hour MCLE Credit The renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state c...


More Info
{"id":11517302604,"title":"Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - MP3","handle":"course-335-tory-v-cochran-a-free-speech-issue-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 335\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state court, arguing the order violated his First Amendment right to free speech. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Cochran died one week after oral argument.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid a judge's order that someone stop making defaming statements about a public figure, even after that figure's death, violate the First Amendment right to free speech?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was that question answered by the court? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:06:48-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T10:51:55-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659455884,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 335","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442202095695,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_232f3508-f266-489c-8858-819d012f6291.jpg?v=1502733116","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 335\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state court, arguing the order violated his First Amendment right to free speech. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Cochran died one week after oral argument.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid a judge's order that someone stop making defaming statements about a public figure, even after that figure's death, violate the First Amendment right to free speech?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was that question answered by the court? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}
Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - MP3

Course #335- Tory v. Cochran: A Free Speech Issue - MP3

$ 59.00

Course 335 1 hour MCLE Credit The renowned Johnnie Cochran sued his former client Ulysses Tory in a California court for making defaming statements. Tory had tried to force Cochran to pay him money in exchange for desisting, Cochran argued. A judge agreed and ordered Tory to never talk about Cochran again. Tory appealed unsuccessfully in state c...


More Info
{"id":309732655,"title":"Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - CD","handle":"course-336-munaf-v-geren-habeas-corpus-and-the-military-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 336\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.facts_of_the_case\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv ng-bind-html=\"case.facts_of_the_case\" class=\"ng-binding\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer. After the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eHirota v. MacArthur\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion: Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/section\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.question\"\u003e\u003c\/section\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:08:28-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:08:28-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659619532,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 336","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_14f58fbf-81f7-4bc6-ad10-09624419d41f.jpg?v=1502733775"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_14f58fbf-81f7-4bc6-ad10-09624419d41f.jpg?v=1502733775","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412618319,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_14f58fbf-81f7-4bc6-ad10-09624419d41f.jpg?v=1502733775"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_14f58fbf-81f7-4bc6-ad10-09624419d41f.jpg?v=1502733775","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 336\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.facts_of_the_case\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv ng-bind-html=\"case.facts_of_the_case\" class=\"ng-binding\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer. After the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eHirota v. MacArthur\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion: Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/section\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.question\"\u003e\u003c\/section\u003e"}
Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - CD

Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - CD

$ 59.00

Course 336 1 hour MCLE Credit In 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he...


More Info
{"id":11517365644,"title":"Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - MP3","handle":"course-336-munaf-v-geren-habeas-corpus-and-the-military-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 336\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.facts_of_the_case\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv ng-bind-html=\"case.facts_of_the_case\" class=\"ng-binding\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer. After the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eHirota v. MacArthur\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion: Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/section\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.question\"\u003e\u003c\/section\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:08:28-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:04:11-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659634124,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 336","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442202980431,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_ff96c6c4-351c-4a7a-96ff-7cc9bac8e601.jpg?v=1502733852","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 336\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.facts_of_the_case\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv ng-bind-html=\"case.facts_of_the_case\" class=\"ng-binding\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer. After the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eHirota v. MacArthur\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion: Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/section\u003e\n\u003csection class=\"abstract ng-scope\" ng-if=\"case.question\"\u003e\u003c\/section\u003e"}
Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - MP3

Course #336- Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military - MP3

$ 59.00

Course 336 1 hour MCLE Credit In 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he...


More Info
{"id":11517461964,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:21:57-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660272460,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442203963471,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}
Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD

Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD

$ 59.00

Course 337 1 hour MCLE Credit When the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be di...


More Info
{"id":11517464972,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:22:21-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660277196,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442204192847,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}
Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3

Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3

$ 59.00

Course 337 1 hour MCLE Credit When the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be di...


More Info