CD's

{"id":463567163,"title":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 545 SERIES","handle":"copy-of-26-unit-cle-bundle-545-series","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e507\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026amp; Discrimination (Transgender)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e509\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e513\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHuman Trafficking\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e514\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSubstance Abuse \u0026amp; Legal Competence\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e515\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eLabor Law: Conflict in Labor \u0026amp; Discrimination Casework\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e516\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eReal Estate Law: Foreclosures \u0026amp; Short Sales\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e517\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCelebrity Confidentialty Agreements\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e519\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law: Conflicts in Mexican and US Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e520\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTrial Tactics in Limine to Closing in 50 minutes\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e521\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eA Judges View of Small Claims Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e522\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e524\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e525\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Ethical \u0026amp; Legal Implications of Ebola\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e526\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e527\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Business Litigation Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e528\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Felony Trials\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e529\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWorkers Compensation: Medical Care After SB863\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e530\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law, Post Conviction \u0026amp; Youth Offender Parole Hearings\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e531\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Claimant's Social Security Benefits\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e532\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Prosecutorial Misconduct\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e534\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpectrum of Mediation \u0026amp; Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e535\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpecial Needs Trusts(SNT)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e536\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e537\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eInsurance Law: An Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e538\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Supreme Court: Disabilities, ADA \u0026amp; FEHA Young vs. UPS\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e539\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-03-09T10:45:00-07:00","created_at":"2015-03-09T10:45:20-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["alternative-dispute-resolution","bankruptcy-restructuring","bias","bundle-course","business-corporate-securities-law","cds","civil-law","competence-issues","competency","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","criminal-law","disability-social-security-law","discrimination-harassment","elimination-of-bias","entertainment-law","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","general","insurance-law","intermediate","international-law","labor-employment-law","personal-injury-and-negligence","real-estate","substance-abuse","supreme-court","trial-skills","wills-trusts-estates","workers-compensation"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43668222732,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"26 Unit - 545 SERIES","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 545 SERIES","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-141,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":14352678991,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":2008,"width":3012,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413"},"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":2008,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140.jpg?v=1504899413","width":3012}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity, A Judges View\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e507\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026amp; Discrimination (Transgender)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e509\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eBankruptcy Law: Chapter 7 Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e513\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHuman Trafficking\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e514\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSubstance Abuse \u0026amp; Legal Competence\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e515\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eLabor Law: Conflict in Labor \u0026amp; Discrimination Casework\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e516\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eReal Estate Law: Foreclosures \u0026amp; Short Sales\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e517\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCelebrity Confidentialty Agreements\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e519\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law: Conflicts in Mexican and US Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e520\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTrial Tactics in Limine to Closing in 50 minutes\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e521\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eA Judges View of Small Claims Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e522\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFamily Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e524\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law Introduction\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e525\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Ethical \u0026amp; Legal Implications of Ebola\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e526\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e527\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Business Litigation Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e528\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Felony Trials\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e529\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWorkers Compensation: Medical Care After SB863\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e530\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCriminal Law, Post Conviction \u0026amp; Youth Offender Parole Hearings\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e531\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Claimant's Social Security Benefits\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e532\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Prosecutorial Misconduct\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e534\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpectrum of Mediation \u0026amp; Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e535\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSpecial Needs Trusts(SNT)\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e536\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e537\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eInsurance Law: An Overview\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e538\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Supreme Court: Disabilities, ADA \u0026amp; FEHA Young vs. UPS\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e539\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":309714471,"title":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 345 SERIES","handle":"26-unit-cle-bundle-345-series","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBundle 345 Series\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hours of MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eSubstance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent?\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e277\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEffective Estate and Tax Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e302\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEssential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e303\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e304\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCritical Essentials of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e305\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to do a Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e306\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Use Government Benefits to Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e307\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Techniques for Cross Examination During Trial\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e308\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAdministrative Law: Honing Your Skills for Trial Prepartations\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e311\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e313\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e315\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e316\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWhen, Why, and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e317\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e318\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e319\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow You Can Win with Post Trial Motions\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e320\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e330\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: Projects Gone Bad and the Litigation that Follows\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e331\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Boumediene vs. Bush, Guantanamo or US Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e334\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Tory vs. Cochran, A Free Speech Issue\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e335\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Munaf vs. Green, Habeus Corpus, and the Military\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e336\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Meacham vs. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e337\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Chamber of Commerce vs. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e338\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy Tax Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e339\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e341\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T12:47:00-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T12:47:22-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["administrative-law","bankruptcy-restructuring","bundle-course","cds","competence-issues","constitutional-law","construction-law","contract-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","office-management","personal-injury-and-negligence","privacy-cybersecurity","substance-abuse","supreme-court","tax-law","technology","trial-skills","wills-trusts-estates"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43668873420,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"26 Unit - 345 SERIES","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 345 SERIES","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":67,"inventory_management":"shopify","inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5411602511,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":1333,"width":2000,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165"},"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":1333,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_9.jpg?v=1504900165","width":2000}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBundle 345 Series\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hours of MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ctable width=\"806\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"668\"\u003eSubstance Abuse: Are You Drug Dependent?\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"74\"\u003e277\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEffective Estate and Tax Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e302\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEssential Keys to Probate: Calendar Notes to Judgement\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e303\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e \u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Successfully Handle a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e304\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCritical Essentials of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e305\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to do a Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e306\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow to Use Government Benefits to Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e307\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning Techniques for Cross Examination During Trial\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e308\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAdministrative Law: Honing Your Skills for Trial Prepartations\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e311\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWinning a Personal Injury Case\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e313\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e315\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Practice Law with Integrity Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e316\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eWhen, Why, and How to Use a Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e317\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e318\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEstate Plans: The Grand Tour of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e319\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHow You Can Win with Post Trial Motions\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e320\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: AIA vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e330\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eConstruction Contracts: Projects Gone Bad and the Litigation that Follows\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e331\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Boumediene vs. Bush, Guantanamo or US Court\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e334\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Tory vs. Cochran, A Free Speech Issue\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e335\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Munaf vs. Green, Habeus Corpus, and the Military\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e336\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Meacham vs. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e337\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: Chamber of Commerce vs. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e338\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSupreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy Tax Law\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e339\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEthics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e341\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e"}

{"id":309733363,"title":"Course #339 - Supreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy \u0026 Tax Law - CD","handle":"course-339-fl-dept-of-rev-v-piccadilly-bankruptcy-tax-law-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 339\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2003, Piccadilly Cafeterias filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy petition in federal court in Florida asking the bankruptcy court for permission to auction off its assets in order to fund a reorganization plan. Piccadilly sought a tax exemption under 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) which states that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax.\" Florida vehemently opposed this exemption and sought to collect $32,000 in taxes from Piccadilly.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bankruptcy court, the district court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit all found in favor of Piccadilly, holding that 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) allowed courts to exempt from taxes pre-confirmation asset sales that were essential to the completion of a reorganization plan. In urging the Court to grant certiorari, Florida pointed to both Third and Fourth Circuit decisions holding that such pre-confirmation asset sales were subject to state taxation, while Piccadilly Cafeterias contended that these so-called \"circuit splits\" only involve a small handful of cases and require no resolution by the Court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(c), a provision of the Bankruptcy Code stating that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax,\" prohibit states from imposing taxes on pre-confirmation asset sales that are essential to the completion of a reorganization plan?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:12:38-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:12:38-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["bankruptcy-restructuring","cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","single-course","supreme-court","tax-law"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660482700,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 339","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #339 - Supreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy \u0026 Tax Law - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_2a208bc2-825c-4b5b-aa81-b3453c49f931.jpg?v=1502735256"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_2a208bc2-825c-4b5b-aa81-b3453c49f931.jpg?v=1502735256","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412683855,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_2a208bc2-825c-4b5b-aa81-b3453c49f931.jpg?v=1502735256"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_2a208bc2-825c-4b5b-aa81-b3453c49f931.jpg?v=1502735256","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 339\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2003, Piccadilly Cafeterias filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy petition in federal court in Florida asking the bankruptcy court for permission to auction off its assets in order to fund a reorganization plan. Piccadilly sought a tax exemption under 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) which states that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax.\" Florida vehemently opposed this exemption and sought to collect $32,000 in taxes from Piccadilly.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bankruptcy court, the district court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit all found in favor of Piccadilly, holding that 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) allowed courts to exempt from taxes pre-confirmation asset sales that were essential to the completion of a reorganization plan. In urging the Court to grant certiorari, Florida pointed to both Third and Fourth Circuit decisions holding that such pre-confirmation asset sales were subject to state taxation, while Piccadilly Cafeterias contended that these so-called \"circuit splits\" only involve a small handful of cases and require no resolution by the Court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(c), a provision of the Bankruptcy Code stating that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax,\" prohibit states from imposing taxes on pre-confirmation asset sales that are essential to the completion of a reorganization plan?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":309730851,"title":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - CD","handle":"course-334-boumediene-v-bush-guantanimo-or-u-s-court-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:00:23-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:00:23-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["advanced","cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659295372,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 334","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #334- Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanamo Or U.S. Court - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5412552783,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_65969132-3355-469d-9b54-61265601ccc8.jpg?v=1502732464","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 334\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestions of the Case:  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e4.\u003cspan\u003eCan the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the decision and conclusion statements of the case. How were all of the questions above answered, and do you agree or disagree with those answers?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11517461964,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:21:57-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660272460,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442203963471,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_cff337fd-fee5-4878-8b89-9ea2426dbb7b.jpg?v=1502734919","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11487409292,"title":"Course #539- Ethics: Supreme Court Case: ADA, Disabilities and the FEHA, Young vs UPS - CD","handle":"course-539-ethics-supreme-court-case-ada-disabilities-and-the-feha-young-vs-ups-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jonathan Ellison, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 539\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHow can law firms and private employers protect themselves against ADA violation lawsuits and the terrible financial consequences that follow? We will show you how to make your ethical consideration practical considerations while avoiding costly left field lawsuits.    \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Ethics and the Americans with Disabilities Act\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Ethics and Reasonable Accommodation Requirements\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Supreme Court Case of Young vs. UPS 12-1226\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how the Americans with Disabilities and Pregnancy Discrimination Acts are interpreted in Young vs. UPS\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several ethical dilemmas the Supreme Court Justices must have faced when considering the verdict for this case.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eJonathan Ellison is an attorney in private practice in the Sacramento area with expertise in disabled peoples' rights, elder law, social security, and housing law.\u003c\/em\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-07T11:16:24-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["advanced","cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","ethics","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43481408268,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"538 CD","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #539- Ethics: Supreme Court Case: ADA, Disabilities and the FEHA, Young vs UPS - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_5c5ff0cb-94a5-4f4e-a04e-c439202c1575.jpg?v=1502129784"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_5c5ff0cb-94a5-4f4e-a04e-c439202c1575.jpg?v=1502129784","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":436869660751,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_5c5ff0cb-94a5-4f4e-a04e-c439202c1575.jpg?v=1502129784"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_5c5ff0cb-94a5-4f4e-a04e-c439202c1575.jpg?v=1502129784","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jonathan Ellison, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 539\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHow can law firms and private employers protect themselves against ADA violation lawsuits and the terrible financial consequences that follow? We will show you how to make your ethical consideration practical considerations while avoiding costly left field lawsuits.    \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Ethics and the Americans with Disabilities Act\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Ethics and Reasonable Accommodation Requirements\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Supreme Court Case of Young vs. UPS 12-1226\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how the Americans with Disabilities and Pregnancy Discrimination Acts are interpreted in Young vs. UPS\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several ethical dilemmas the Supreme Court Justices must have faced when considering the verdict for this case.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eJonathan Ellison is an attorney in private practice in the Sacramento area with expertise in disabled peoples' rights, elder law, social security, and housing law.\u003c\/em\u003e"}

{"id":11487967820,"title":"Course #550- Supreme Court: Same Sex Marriage \u0026 14th Amendment - CD -","handle":"course-550-supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-14th-amendment-cd","description":"\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Curtis Howard, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 550\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eUS Supreme Court Case Obergefell vs Hodges Docket 14-556 (2014). \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e1. The case argued that the states' statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights Act\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e2. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the trial court and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violate the courts 14th Amendment rights or equal protection and due process\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExamine the oral arguments for Obergefell v Hodges\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the question: Does the 14th amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between 2 people of the same sex that was legally licensed in another state?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California\u003cstrong\u003e, \u003c\/strong\u003eat the Law Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-07T14:43:10-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["advanced","cds","constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43481285516,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"550 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #550- Supreme Court: Same Sex Marriage \u0026 14th Amendment - CD -","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_92d0c158-2ea0-4e2f-be72-876f86d691ae.png?v=1502142190"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_92d0c158-2ea0-4e2f-be72-876f86d691ae.png?v=1502142190","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":437110505551,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"width":180,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_92d0c158-2ea0-4e2f-be72-876f86d691ae.png?v=1502142190"},"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_92d0c158-2ea0-4e2f-be72-876f86d691ae.png?v=1502142190","width":180}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Curtis Howard, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 550\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eUS Supreme Court Case Obergefell vs Hodges Docket 14-556 (2014). \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e1. The case argued that the states' statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights Act\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e2. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the trial court and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violate the courts 14th Amendment rights or equal protection and due process\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExamine the oral arguments for Obergefell v Hodges\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the question: Does the 14th amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between 2 people of the same sex that was legally licensed in another state?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California\u003cstrong\u003e, \u003c\/strong\u003eat the Law Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11487870092,"title":"Course #549- Supreme Court: 1st Amendment, Free Speech vs. Hate Speech - CD","handle":"course-549-supreme-court-1st-amendment-free-speech-vs-hate-speech-cd","description":"\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Judge Joel Primes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 549\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eSeminar Description: Numerous US Supreme Court Decisions regarding free speech and exception for fighting words or hate speech will be discussed. The law will be applied to the recent Prophet Mohammed carton contest in Garland Texas sponsored by Pamela Geller. Does free speech protect speech where it deliberately provokes extremists in the hope that it will cause violence? Is there a clear and present imminent likely lawless action?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eKey Points\/Objectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e1. Free speech case law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e2. Exception for fighting words or hate speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e3. Government may act to protect public from anticipated violence\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e4. Law applied to the Prophet Mohammed carton content re Garland Texas to provoke extremists to respond to violence. Could this violence be imminent and foreseeable?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eJudge Joel Primes served as the California Deputy Attorney General, Civil Division (1968-2004) and a Temporary Sacramento Superior Court Judge (2009 to present).\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-07T14:16:30-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43481196364,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"550 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #549- Supreme Court: 1st Amendment, Free Speech vs. Hate Speech - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/primespic_cd15abb5-afdc-485b-a938-fa9e7288a176.jpg?v=1502140590"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/primespic_cd15abb5-afdc-485b-a938-fa9e7288a176.jpg?v=1502140590","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":437078884431,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.958,"height":600,"width":575,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/primespic_cd15abb5-afdc-485b-a938-fa9e7288a176.jpg?v=1502140590"},"aspect_ratio":0.958,"height":600,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/primespic_cd15abb5-afdc-485b-a938-fa9e7288a176.jpg?v=1502140590","width":575}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Judge Joel Primes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 549\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eSeminar Description: Numerous US Supreme Court Decisions regarding free speech and exception for fighting words or hate speech will be discussed. The law will be applied to the recent Prophet Mohammed carton contest in Garland Texas sponsored by Pamela Geller. Does free speech protect speech where it deliberately provokes extremists in the hope that it will cause violence? Is there a clear and present imminent likely lawless action?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003eKey Points\/Objectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e1. Free speech case law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e2. Exception for fighting words or hate speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e3. Government may act to protect public from anticipated violence\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e4. Law applied to the Prophet Mohammed carton content re Garland Texas to provoke extremists to respond to violence. Could this violence be imminent and foreseeable?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eJudge Joel Primes served as the California Deputy Attorney General, Civil Division (1968-2004) and a Temporary Sacramento Superior Court Judge (2009 to present).\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11487470028,"title":"Course #542- Labor and Employment Law Review: Supreme Court Cases - CD","handle":"course-542-labor-and-employment-law-review-supreme-court-cases-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jayson Javitz, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 542\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Update of Key California Supreme Court Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Update of Key Legislation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Five cases and 1 Legislative Promulgation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the different cases mentioned\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand all the parts of the Paid Sick Leave Law and identify which cases involved this legislation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJayson Javitz is Director and General Counsel of River City Petroleum.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-07T12:01:09-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43480191116,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"538 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #542- Labor and Employment Law Review: Supreme Court Cases - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_5836ff74-47eb-4f65-a6a4-c3b1449e624c.jpg?v=1502132470"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_5836ff74-47eb-4f65-a6a4-c3b1449e624c.jpg?v=1502132470","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":436904329295,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.842,"height":600,"width":505,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_5836ff74-47eb-4f65-a6a4-c3b1449e624c.jpg?v=1502132470"},"aspect_ratio":0.842,"height":600,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/javitz_5836ff74-47eb-4f65-a6a4-c3b1449e624c.jpg?v=1502132470","width":505}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jayson Javitz, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 542\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Update of Key California Supreme Court Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Update of Key Legislation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Five cases and 1 Legislative Promulgation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the different cases mentioned\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand all the parts of the Paid Sick Leave Law and identify which cases involved this legislation\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJayson Javitz is Director and General Counsel of River City Petroleum.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11487424396,"title":"Course #540- Ethics: Supreme Court, 1st Amendment \u0026 Conflicts of Interest - CD","handle":"course-540-ethics-supreme-court-1st-amendment-conflicts-of-interest-cd","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpeaker: Curtis Howard\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCourse 540\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis course covers the Supreme Court case of Commission on Ethics vs. Carrigan, docket No 10-568. Question: Does the supreme court subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny? \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. The 1st Amendment does not subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Nevada Ethics in Government Law is not unconstitutionally overbroad\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Restrictions upon legislators' voting rights are restrictions upon their speech (Justice Alito)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvaluate the oral arguments for Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several ethical dilemmas the Supreme Court Justices must have faced when considering the verdict for this case\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2016-01-19T11:44:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-07T11:47:07-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["advanced","cds","constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","ethics","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43473917388,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #540- Ethics: Supreme Court, 1st Amendment \u0026 Conflicts of Interest - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":436891091023,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"width":180,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627"},"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627","width":180}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpeaker: Curtis Howard\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCourse 540\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis course covers the Supreme Court case of Commission on Ethics vs. Carrigan, docket No 10-568. Question: Does the supreme court subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny? \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. The 1st Amendment does not subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Nevada Ethics in Government Law is not unconstitutionally overbroad\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Restrictions upon legislators' voting rights are restrictions upon their speech (Justice Alito)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvaluate the oral arguments for Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several ethical dilemmas the Supreme Court Justices must have faced when considering the verdict for this case\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11445584396,"title":"Course #612- Competency, Substance Abuse \u0026 Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Case Raytheon vs. Hernandez - CD","handle":"course-612-competency-substance-abuse-bias-u-s-supreme-court-case-raytheon-vs-hernandez-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e Speaker: Curtis L. Howard, JD \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCourse 612\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e1 hour MCLE Competency\/Substance Abuse\/Bias Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLegal Competency, Substance Abuse and Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Raytheon vs. Hernandez\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e(US Supreme Court Case 02-749) \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eKey Points\/Objectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e 1. Does the American with Disabilities Act permit employers to refuse to rehire job applicants because of prior workplace rule infractions related to drug or alcohol addiction?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-07-26T15:12:01-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","clelaw","competence-issues","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","disability-social-security-law","elimination-of-bias","intermediate","single-course","substance-abuse","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43288056588,"title":"aaron cle","option1":"aaron cle","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"612 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #612- Competency, Substance Abuse \u0026 Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Case Raytheon vs. Hernandez - CD - aaron cle","public_title":"aaron cle","options":["aaron cle"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_8c58302e-6e8d-408a-bfbe-c4ed2c96cbbc.png?v=1501107122"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_8c58302e-6e8d-408a-bfbe-c4ed2c96cbbc.png?v=1501107122","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":433117528143,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"width":180,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_8c58302e-6e8d-408a-bfbe-c4ed2c96cbbc.png?v=1501107122"},"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_8c58302e-6e8d-408a-bfbe-c4ed2c96cbbc.png?v=1501107122","width":180}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e Speaker: Curtis L. Howard, JD \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCourse 612\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e1 hour MCLE Competency\/Substance Abuse\/Bias Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLegal Competency, Substance Abuse and Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Raytheon vs. Hernandez\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e(US Supreme Court Case 02-749) \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eKey Points\/Objectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e 1. Does the American with Disabilities Act permit employers to refuse to rehire job applicants because of prior workplace rule infractions related to drug or alcohol addiction?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11445128332,"title":"Course #601- Legal Competency \u0026 Criminal Law: Supreme Court Case: Panetti vs. Quarterman - CD","handle":"course-601-legal-competency-criminal-law-supreme-court-case-panetti-vs-quarterman-cd","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eSpeaker: Curtis L. Howard, JD \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCourse 601\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e1 hour MCLE Competency Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003eLegal Competency \u0026amp; Criminal Law: Supreme Court Case: Panetti vs. Quarterman\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eKey Points \/ Objectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Does the Eight Amendment permit the execution of an inmate who has a factual awareness of the State's stated reason for his execution, but who lacks, due to mental illness, a rational understanding of the State's justification?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-07-26T14:19:29-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["cds","clelaw","competence-issues","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","criminal-law","Format_Audio CD","intermediate","single-course","substance-abuse-mental-health","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43669292812,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"601 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #601- Legal Competency \u0026 Criminal Law: Supreme Court Case: Panetti vs. Quarterman - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_d25a8385-9152-497b-b173-95ece4498da0.png?v=1501103969"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_d25a8385-9152-497b-b173-95ece4498da0.png?v=1501103969","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":433029152847,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"width":180,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_d25a8385-9152-497b-b173-95ece4498da0.png?v=1501103969"},"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_d25a8385-9152-497b-b173-95ece4498da0.png?v=1501103969","width":180}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eSpeaker: Curtis L. Howard, JD \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCourse 601\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e1 hour MCLE Competency Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003eLegal Competency \u0026amp; Criminal Law: Supreme Court Case: Panetti vs. Quarterman\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eKey Points \/ Objectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Does the Eight Amendment permit the execution of an inmate who has a factual awareness of the State's stated reason for his execution, but who lacks, due to mental illness, a rational understanding of the State's justification?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}