Audio CDs- Singles

{"id":11487424396,"title":"Course #540- Ethics: Supreme Court, 1st Amendment \u0026 Conflicts of Interest - CD","handle":"course-540-ethics-supreme-court-1st-amendment-conflicts-of-interest-cd","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpeaker: Curtis Howard\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCourse 540\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis course covers the Supreme Court case of Commission on Ethics vs. Carrigan, docket No 10-568. Question: Does the supreme court subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny? \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. The 1st Amendment does not subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Nevada Ethics in Government Law is not unconstitutionally overbroad\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Restrictions upon legislators' voting rights are restrictions upon their speech (Justice Alito)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvaluate the oral arguments for Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several ethical dilemmas the Supreme Court Justices must have faced when considering the verdict for this case\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2016-01-19T11:44:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-07T11:47:07-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["advanced","cds","constitutional-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","ethics","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43473917388,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #540- Ethics: Supreme Court, 1st Amendment \u0026 Conflicts of Interest - CD","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":436891091023,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"width":180,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627"},"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_86cd71c2-41f7-477e-aa60-de502f2eba9c.png?v=1502131627","width":180}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpeaker: Curtis Howard\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCourse 540\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis course covers the Supreme Court case of Commission on Ethics vs. Carrigan, docket No 10-568. Question: Does the supreme court subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny? \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. The 1st Amendment does not subject state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. The Nevada Ethics in Government Law is not unconstitutionally overbroad\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Restrictions upon legislators' voting rights are restrictions upon their speech (Justice Alito)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvaluate the oral arguments for Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify several ethical dilemmas the Supreme Court Justices must have faced when considering the verdict for this case\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":7903750881494,"title":"#1 26 unit CD bundle 700 Series...All in One MCLE CDs..New","handle":"700-series-all-in-one-mcle-cds","description":"\u003cp\u003e700 series\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e26 hrs of mcle\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Ethics\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Elimination of Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Implicit Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ecds available\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e701 Worker's Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e702 Covid-19 Stay at Home Orders\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e703 Competency Cell Phone Addiction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e704 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e706 Elimination of Bias Transgender\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e707 Law Practice Management: Public Speaking\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e708 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Scotus Omicron\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFree Speech vs Canadian Truckers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e709 Appellate Decision in Trump vs Jan 6 Committee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e710 SCOTUS Dobb's vs Jackson, Women's Health..2 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e711 Ethical Competency \u0026amp; impairment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e712 Law Practice Management SWOT Analysis\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e713 SCOTUS Biden vs Missouri 4 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e715 Watergate US vs Nixon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e716 Covid-19 Vaccine \u0026amp; Mask Mandates vs Freedom of Speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e718 Ethics Shapero vs Kentucky Bar Assn..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e719 Ethics Wilner vs Committee on Character..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e720 Ethics Koningsberg vs State Bar of California..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e721 Technology: SCOTUS  Carpenter vs US\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e722 Technology SCOTUS Am Broad Cos vs Aereo Inc\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e734 Implicit Bias Workplace \u0026amp; Jury Selection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2022-10-31T10:30:00-07:00","created_at":"2022-10-25T21:32:46-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["#covid","#implicitbias","#ITlaw","#scotus","1st amendment","Audio CD","bias","calosha","competence-issues","competency","constitutional-law","credit-state_california","credit-state_new-york","education-law","elimination-of-bias","ethics","Format_OnDemand Video","general","Internet","internet technology","OnDemand","practical-skills","substance-abuse","substance-abuse-mental-health","Tria","trial-skills","workers-compensation","Workplace Injury"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43746261565654,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"100","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#1 26 unit CD bundle 700 Series...All in One MCLE CDs..New","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":454,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":19,"inventory_management":"shopify","inventory_policy":"continue","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":31480475189462,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.655,"height":553,"width":915,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871"},"aspect_ratio":1.655,"height":553,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871","width":915}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e700 series\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e26 hrs of mcle\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Ethics\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Elimination of Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Implicit Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ecds available\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e701 Worker's Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e702 Covid-19 Stay at Home Orders\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e703 Competency Cell Phone Addiction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e704 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e706 Elimination of Bias Transgender\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e707 Law Practice Management: Public Speaking\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e708 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Scotus Omicron\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFree Speech vs Canadian Truckers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e709 Appellate Decision in Trump vs Jan 6 Committee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e710 SCOTUS Dobb's vs Jackson, Women's Health..2 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e711 Ethical Competency \u0026amp; impairment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e712 Law Practice Management SWOT Analysis\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e713 SCOTUS Biden vs Missouri 4 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e715 Watergate US vs Nixon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e716 Covid-19 Vaccine \u0026amp; Mask Mandates vs Freedom of Speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e718 Ethics Shapero vs Kentucky Bar Assn..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e719 Ethics Wilner vs Committee on Character..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e720 Ethics Koningsberg vs State Bar of California..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e721 Technology: SCOTUS  Carpenter vs US\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e722 Technology SCOTUS Am Broad Cos vs Aereo Inc\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e734 Implicit Bias Workplace \u0026amp; Jury Selection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}