Aaron & Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash & Gump) CLE

{"id":309743207,"title":"Course #428- Ethics: Email and Technology in Legal Practice - MP3","handle":"course-428-ethics-email-and-technology-in-legal-practice-1-hour","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: James Griffiths\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 428\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDo you ever use email in your law practice?  How about drafting legal documents and pleadings on the computer?  Or drafting discovery documents or transactional documents and emailing them or filing them online? In this session, we will discuss important emerging areas of legal ethics and technology. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Metadata - definitions, hazards, confidential vs. privileged information\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. How to remove embedded data\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Ethical issues involved for attorneys receiving electronic documents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Different state jurisdictions \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Recent developments in metadata and electronically stored information (ESI)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the rules governing client files containing electronic documents created by the attorney\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the dangers of having metadata and how clients or other attorneys can use it against you\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the privacy levels of email and electronic communication to phone calls and personal meetings\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJames Griffiths is an attorney at Lepiscopo and Associates in San Diego, California. He focuses his practice on business litigation, personal injury, and non-profit corporation. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:47-07:00","created_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:47-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","ethics","intellectual-property","intermediate","law-practice-management","legal-research-writing","mp3","privacy-cybersecurity","single-course","technology"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43532738316,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 428","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #428- Ethics: Email and Technology in Legal Practice - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-4,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_6f2485b9-8795-4e53-8895-26c8fb844ef1.jpg?v=1502301767"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_6f2485b9-8795-4e53-8895-26c8fb844ef1.jpg?v=1502301767","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":5413568591,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_6f2485b9-8795-4e53-8895-26c8fb844ef1.jpg?v=1502301767"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_6f2485b9-8795-4e53-8895-26c8fb844ef1.jpg?v=1502301767","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: James Griffiths\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 428\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDo you ever use email in your law practice?  How about drafting legal documents and pleadings on the computer?  Or drafting discovery documents or transactional documents and emailing them or filing them online? In this session, we will discuss important emerging areas of legal ethics and technology. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Metadata - definitions, hazards, confidential vs. privileged information\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. How to remove embedded data\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Ethical issues involved for attorneys receiving electronic documents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Different state jurisdictions \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Recent developments in metadata and electronically stored information (ESI)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the rules governing client files containing electronic documents created by the attorney\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the dangers of having metadata and how clients or other attorneys can use it against you\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the privacy levels of email and electronic communication to phone calls and personal meetings\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJames Griffiths is an attorney at Lepiscopo and Associates in San Diego, California. He focuses his practice on business litigation, personal injury, and non-profit corporation. \u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11495736652,"title":"Course #509- Bias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026 Discrimination (Transgender) - MP3","handle":"copy-of-course-509-bias-harassment-retaliation-discrimination-transgender-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeakers: Emma Forest, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 509\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers Harassment, Retaliation and Discrimination and 11 New Laws.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Employees on Public Assistance\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Criminal conviction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. National Origin\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Suspected Undocumented workers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Immigration Status Protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6. Employee exercise of labor code rights\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e7. Enhanced whistleblower protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e8. Abuse conduct prevention training\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e9. Harassment prohibition extends to unpaid interns\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e10. Revised definition of sexual harassment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e11. Stalking victims added to Labor Code Protections\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e12. Macy v. Holder\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEmma Forrest is an attorney in Sacramento, California, with 16 years of experience in the areas of labor and employment, real estate, construction defect, insurance bad faith, personal injury, medical and professional malpractice, intellectual property, technology, and business litigation for both plaintiffs and defendants in California state and federal courts.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-12-26T10:38:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-09T13:34:15-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discrimination-harassment","elimination-of-bias","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43540212620,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 509","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #509- Bias: Harassment, Retaliation \u0026 Discrimination (Transgender) - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-2,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300_c4253093-083a-4bcf-a14c-f6eacf535a37.png?v=1502310859"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300_c4253093-083a-4bcf-a14c-f6eacf535a37.png?v=1502310859","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":438451372111,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.707,"height":300,"width":212,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300_c4253093-083a-4bcf-a14c-f6eacf535a37.png?v=1502310859"},"aspect_ratio":0.707,"height":300,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/emmaforrest-212x300_c4253093-083a-4bcf-a14c-f6eacf535a37.png?v=1502310859","width":212}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeakers: Emma Forest, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 509\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Bias Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course covers Harassment, Retaliation and Discrimination and 11 New Laws.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Employees on Public Assistance\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Criminal conviction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. National Origin\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Suspected Undocumented workers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Immigration Status Protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6. Employee exercise of labor code rights\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e7. Enhanced whistleblower protection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e8. Abuse conduct prevention training\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e9. Harassment prohibition extends to unpaid interns\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e10. Revised definition of sexual harassment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e11. Stalking victims added to Labor Code Protections\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e12. Macy v. Holder\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEmma Forrest is an attorney in Sacramento, California, with 16 years of experience in the areas of labor and employment, real estate, construction defect, insurance bad faith, personal injury, medical and professional malpractice, intellectual property, technology, and business litigation for both plaintiffs and defendants in California state and federal courts.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11500746380,"title":"Course #536- Special Needs Trusts - MP3","handle":"course-536-special-needs-trusts-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Clara Yang, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 536\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Laws governing the special needs trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Third party special needs trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. First party special needs trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Pool trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Able Act\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to develop special needs trusts within the law\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the differences between first and third party trusts\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn what to consider and to look for when searching for \"The Ideal Trustee\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eClara Yang is an attorney at the Mother Lode Law Firm in Placerville, California. She specializes in Estate Planning, Probate, Conservatorship and Elder Law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:43:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-10T15:44:04-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","wills-trusts-estates"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43576728204,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"536 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #536- Special Needs Trusts - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/clarayang_6ba843d2-d6b0-4897-823f-dc9f185692f7.jpg?v=1502405044"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/clarayang_6ba843d2-d6b0-4897-823f-dc9f185692f7.jpg?v=1502405044","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":439314841679,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.0,"height":320,"width":320,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/clarayang_6ba843d2-d6b0-4897-823f-dc9f185692f7.jpg?v=1502405044"},"aspect_ratio":1.0,"height":320,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/clarayang_6ba843d2-d6b0-4897-823f-dc9f185692f7.jpg?v=1502405044","width":320}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Clara Yang, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 536\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Laws governing the special needs trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Third party special needs trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. First party special needs trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Pool trust\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Able Act\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn how to develop special needs trusts within the law\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the differences between first and third party trusts\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn what to consider and to look for when searching for \"The Ideal Trustee\"\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eClara Yang is an attorney at the Mother Lode Law Firm in Placerville, California. She specializes in Estate Planning, Probate, Conservatorship and Elder Law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11495920268,"title":"Course #612- Competency, Substance Abuse \u0026 Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Case Raytheon vs. Hernandez - MP3","handle":"course-612-competency-substance-abuse-bias-u-s-supreme-court-case-raytheon-vs-hernandez-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e Speaker: Curtis L. Howard, JD \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCourse 612\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e1 hour MCLE Competency\/Substance Abuse\/Bias Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLegal Competency, Substance Abuse and Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Raytheon vs. Hernandez\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e(US Supreme Court Case 02-749) \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eKey Points\/Objectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e 1. Does the American with Disabilities Act permit employers to refuse to rehire job applicants because of prior workplace rule infractions related to drug or alcohol addiction?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T13:53:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-09T14:15:21-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["clelaw","competence-issues","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","disability-social-security-law","elimination-of-bias","intermediate","mp3","single-course","substance-abuse","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43542964364,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"612 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #612- Competency, Substance Abuse \u0026 Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Case Raytheon vs. Hernandez - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-3,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_85749349-cf0e-47bb-95eb-e5637b76ee84.png?v=1502313321"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_85749349-cf0e-47bb-95eb-e5637b76ee84.png?v=1502313321","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":438509404239,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"width":180,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_85749349-cf0e-47bb-95eb-e5637b76ee84.png?v=1502313321"},"aspect_ratio":0.588,"height":306,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/curtis-howard_85749349-cf0e-47bb-95eb-e5637b76ee84.png?v=1502313321","width":180}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e Speaker: Curtis L. Howard, JD \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCourse 612\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e1 hour MCLE Competency\/Substance Abuse\/Bias Credit\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLegal Competency, Substance Abuse and Bias: U.S. Supreme Court Raytheon vs. Hernandez\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e(US Supreme Court Case 02-749) \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eKey Points\/Objectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp class=\"post_body js-post_body js-video_description\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e 1. Does the American with Disabilities Act permit employers to refuse to rehire job applicants because of prior workplace rule infractions related to drug or alcohol addiction?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eMr. Howard is a Criminal Defense Attorney in Sacramento, California, at the \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eLaw Office of Curtis L. Howard JR.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11495287436,"title":"Course #515- Substance Abuse \u0026 Legal Competency - MP3","handle":"course-515-substance-abuse-legal-competency-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jeffrey Erskine, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 515\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Substance Abuse\/Competency Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlcoholism and Drug Addiction are epidemic in our society. This course helps you to understand addictions, reasons and the latest treatments available. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course is presented by an attorney about his own struggles with substance abuse, the other Bar that members of AA can attend and the competency of drug abusers. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJeffrey Erskine is an Immigration attorney in Corona, California. He is also a professor at the Law School at Trinity College.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-20T16:28:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-09T11:15:03-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["competence-issues","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","intermediate","mp3","single-course","substance-abuse"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43533123916,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 515","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #515- Substance Abuse \u0026 Legal Competency - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/erskine-jeffrey-1-n57g4qnzae980cnanrwhzorknlty20o0vqor09iszo_1864344a-a35d-4767-ab2f-6a1a810cd299.jpg?v=1502302504"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/erskine-jeffrey-1-n57g4qnzae980cnanrwhzorknlty20o0vqor09iszo_1864344a-a35d-4767-ab2f-6a1a810cd299.jpg?v=1502302504","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":438334292047,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.0,"height":250,"width":250,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/erskine-jeffrey-1-n57g4qnzae980cnanrwhzorknlty20o0vqor09iszo_1864344a-a35d-4767-ab2f-6a1a810cd299.jpg?v=1502302504"},"aspect_ratio":1.0,"height":250,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/erskine-jeffrey-1-n57g4qnzae980cnanrwhzorknlty20o0vqor09iszo_1864344a-a35d-4767-ab2f-6a1a810cd299.jpg?v=1502302504","width":250}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jeffrey Erskine, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 515\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Substance Abuse\/Competency Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlcoholism and Drug Addiction are epidemic in our society. This course helps you to understand addictions, reasons and the latest treatments available. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course is presented by an attorney about his own struggles with substance abuse, the other Bar that members of AA can attend and the competency of drug abusers. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJeffrey Erskine is an Immigration attorney in Corona, California. He is also a professor at the Law School at Trinity College.\u003c\/em\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":2416350691407,"title":"#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--Webinar","handle":"copy-of-course-532-winning-claimants-social-security-benefits-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jonathan Ellison, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 667\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186321928\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003e1 hour of MCLE or 60 minutes\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003eOutline:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Evaluating the case - claimant eligibility, 2 pm to 215 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. What must be proved 215 pm to 230 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. SSA Sequential Evaluation 230 pm to 240pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Written Advocacy - Hearing 240 pm to 250 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Attorney Fees 250 pm to 3 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn the steps an attorney should take to represent a client who has been wrongfully denied federal disability benefits\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to represent a client looking to obtain disability insurance and\/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJonathan Ellison is an attorney in private practice in the Sacramento area with expertise in disabled peoples' rights, elder law, social security, and housing law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-04T16:26:30-07:00","created_at":"2019-02-16T10:21:43-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","disability-social-security-law","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21448205959247,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--Webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1214187339855,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jonathan Ellison, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 667\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186321928\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003e1 hour of MCLE or 60 minutes\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003eOutline:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Evaluating the case - claimant eligibility, 2 pm to 215 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. What must be proved 215 pm to 230 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. SSA Sequential Evaluation 230 pm to 240pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Written Advocacy - Hearing 240 pm to 250 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Attorney Fees 250 pm to 3 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn the steps an attorney should take to represent a client who has been wrongfully denied federal disability benefits\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to represent a client looking to obtain disability insurance and\/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJonathan Ellison is an attorney in private practice in the Sacramento area with expertise in disabled peoples' rights, elder law, social security, and housing law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11495915340,"title":"Course #607- Civil Law and Motion - MP3","handle":"course-607-civil-law-and-motion-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Lyle Solomon, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 607\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse includes typical civil law motions, breach of contract, PI, UD's and family law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e 1) Laws Governing Civil Law and Motion\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2) Types of Civil Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3) Essential Elements of Civil Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4) Motion Hearings\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5) Special Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMr. Solomon is a Solo Practitioner in Civil Litigation in Sacramento, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-11-26T16:05:00-08:00","created_at":"2017-08-09T14:13:42-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["aaroncle-com","beginner","civil-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","motions","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43542947724,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #607- Civil Law and Motion - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lylesolomon_d1621947-5e51-4903-82fd-eed8d78fd976.PNG?v=1502313223"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lylesolomon_d1621947-5e51-4903-82fd-eed8d78fd976.PNG?v=1502313223","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":438507110479,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.815,"height":248,"width":202,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lylesolomon_d1621947-5e51-4903-82fd-eed8d78fd976.PNG?v=1502313223"},"aspect_ratio":0.815,"height":248,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lylesolomon_d1621947-5e51-4903-82fd-eed8d78fd976.PNG?v=1502313223","width":202}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Lyle Solomon, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 607\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCivil Law and Motion\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse includes typical civil law motions, breach of contract, PI, UD's and family law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e 1) Laws Governing Civil Law and Motion\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2) Types of Civil Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3) Essential Elements of Civil Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4) Motion Hearings\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5) Special Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMr. Solomon is a Solo Practitioner in Civil Litigation in Sacramento, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11518516236,"title":"Course #409- Orientation to Criminal Law - MP3","handle":"course-409-orientation-to-criminal-law-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Brian McGinity\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 409\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHave you ever wondered if criminal cases are like you see on Perry Mason? This course gives you an introduction to Criminal Law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course emphasizes the substantive law and the actual procedural presentation of a criminal matter at the various levels of a criminal case.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Basics of a Criminal case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Substantive Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Procedural Presentation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn about infractions, misdemeanors, and felonies\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the process for trying criminal cases\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn all the different aspects of the appeal process\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMr. McGinity is a Family and Criminal Lawyer at the McGinity Law Office in Cameron Park, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:24:19-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T15:34:55-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["beginner","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","criminal-law","general","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43669239948,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 409","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #409- Orientation to Criminal Law - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/brianmcginity_6484bd14-0f5f-4c66-8b9d-6c7bedc4f5e7.jpg?v=1502750096"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/brianmcginity_6484bd14-0f5f-4c66-8b9d-6c7bedc4f5e7.jpg?v=1502750096","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442211729487,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.748,"height":600,"width":449,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/brianmcginity_6484bd14-0f5f-4c66-8b9d-6c7bedc4f5e7.jpg?v=1502750096"},"aspect_ratio":0.748,"height":600,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/brianmcginity_6484bd14-0f5f-4c66-8b9d-6c7bedc4f5e7.jpg?v=1502750096","width":449}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Brian McGinity\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 409\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHave you ever wondered if criminal cases are like you see on Perry Mason? This course gives you an introduction to Criminal Law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course emphasizes the substantive law and the actual procedural presentation of a criminal matter at the various levels of a criminal case.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Basics of a Criminal case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. Substantive Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Procedural Presentation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn about infractions, misdemeanors, and felonies\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the process for trying criminal cases\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn all the different aspects of the appeal process\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMr. McGinity is a Family and Criminal Lawyer at the McGinity Law Office in Cameron Park, California.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11517562252,"title":"Course #680- Ethics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice - MP3","handle":"course-341-ethics-issues-of-email-and-technology-in-legal-practice-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: James Griffiths, Course 680\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1.5 hours MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDo you ever use email in your law practice?  How about drafting legal documents and pleadings on the computer?  Or drafting discovery documents or transactional documents and emailing them or filing them online? In this session, we will discuss important emerging areas of legal ethics and technology. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Metadata - definitions, hazards, confidential vs. privileged information\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. How to remove embedded data\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Ethical issues involved for attorneys receiving electronic documents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Different state jurisdictions \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Recent developments in metadata and electronically stored information (ESI)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the rules governing client files containing electronic documents created by the attorney\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the dangers of having metadata and how clients or other attorneys can use it against you\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the privacy levels of email and electronic communication to phone calls and personal meetings\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJames Griffiths is an attorney at in San Diego, California. He focuses his practice on business litigation, personal injury, and non-profit corporation.\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:40:47-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:40:11-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","ethics","intellectual-property","intermediate","law-practice-management","legal-research-writing","mp3","privacy-cybersecurity","single-course","technology"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43661346060,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 341","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #680- Ethics: Issues of Email and Technology in Legal Practice - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-3,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f9673f51-3f83-4647-9a60-522d8e84b51d.jpg?v=1502736011"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f9673f51-3f83-4647-9a60-522d8e84b51d.jpg?v=1502736011","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442206289999,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f9673f51-3f83-4647-9a60-522d8e84b51d.jpg?v=1502736011"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f9673f51-3f83-4647-9a60-522d8e84b51d.jpg?v=1502736011","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: James Griffiths, Course 680\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1.5 hours MCLE Ethics Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDo you ever use email in your law practice?  How about drafting legal documents and pleadings on the computer?  Or drafting discovery documents or transactional documents and emailing them or filing them online? In this session, we will discuss important emerging areas of legal ethics and technology. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKey Points:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Metadata - definitions, hazards, confidential vs. privileged information\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. How to remove embedded data\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Ethical issues involved for attorneys receiving electronic documents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Different state jurisdictions \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Recent developments in metadata and electronically stored information (ESI)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand the rules governing client files containing electronic documents created by the attorney\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdentify the dangers of having metadata and how clients or other attorneys can use it against you\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompare and contrast the privacy levels of email and electronic communication to phone calls and personal meetings\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJames Griffiths is an attorney at in San Diego, California. He focuses his practice on business litigation, personal injury, and non-profit corporation.\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":11517500300,"title":"Course #339- Supreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy \u0026 Tax Law - MP3","handle":"course-339-supreme-court-fl-dept-of-rev-vs-piccadilly-bankruptcy-tax-law-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 339\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2003, Piccadilly Cafeterias filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy petition in federal court in Florida asking the bankruptcy court for permission to auction off its assets in order to fund a reorganization plan. Piccadilly sought a tax exemption under 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) which states that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax.\" Florida vehemently opposed this exemption and sought to collect $32,000 in taxes from Piccadilly.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bankruptcy court, the district court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit all found in favor of Piccadilly, holding that 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) allowed courts to exempt from taxes pre-confirmation asset sales that were essential to the completion of a reorganization plan. In urging the Court to grant certiorari, Florida pointed to both Third and Fourth Circuit decisions holding that such pre-confirmation asset sales were subject to state taxation, while Piccadilly Cafeterias contended that these so-called \"circuit splits\" only involve a small handful of cases and require no resolution by the Court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(c), a provision of the Bankruptcy Code stating that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax,\" prohibit states from imposing taxes on pre-confirmation asset sales that are essential to the completion of a reorganization plan?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:12:38-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:28:45-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["bankruptcy-restructuring","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course","supreme-court","tax-law"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660539916,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 339","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #339- Supreme Court: FL Dept of Rev vs. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy \u0026 Tax Law - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_df4f8600-728a-4aaa-98dd-a4ca6e89ce58.jpg?v=1502735328"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_df4f8600-728a-4aaa-98dd-a4ca6e89ce58.jpg?v=1502735328","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442205864015,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_df4f8600-728a-4aaa-98dd-a4ca6e89ce58.jpg?v=1502735328"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_df4f8600-728a-4aaa-98dd-a4ca6e89ce58.jpg?v=1502735328","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 339\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2003, Piccadilly Cafeterias filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy petition in federal court in Florida asking the bankruptcy court for permission to auction off its assets in order to fund a reorganization plan. Piccadilly sought a tax exemption under 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) which states that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax.\" Florida vehemently opposed this exemption and sought to collect $32,000 in taxes from Piccadilly.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bankruptcy court, the district court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit all found in favor of Piccadilly, holding that 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) allowed courts to exempt from taxes pre-confirmation asset sales that were essential to the completion of a reorganization plan. In urging the Court to grant certiorari, Florida pointed to both Third and Fourth Circuit decisions holding that such pre-confirmation asset sales were subject to state taxation, while Piccadilly Cafeterias contended that these so-called \"circuit splits\" only involve a small handful of cases and require no resolution by the Court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(c), a provision of the Bankruptcy Code stating that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax,\" prohibit states from imposing taxes on pre-confirmation asset sales that are essential to the completion of a reorganization plan?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11517464972,"title":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","handle":"course-337-supreme-court-meacham-vs-knolls-atomic-power-laboratory-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-14T11:14:54-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:22:21-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43660277196,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #337- Supreme Court: Meacham vs Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442204192847,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_d684a443-e04b-414d-85ea-7f598f25bed6.jpg?v=1502734964","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 337\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003eto hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eSmith v. City of Jackson\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question above answered? Do you agree or disagree with this answer?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}

{"id":11517409356,"title":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - MP3","handle":"course-338-chamber-of-commerce-v-brown-labor-law-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","published_at":"2014-06-17T14:09:48-07:00","created_at":"2017-08-14T11:12:58-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","labor-employment-law","mp3","single-course","supreme-court"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43659973836,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"Course# 338","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"Course #338- Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law - MP3","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":null,"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[],"quantity_rule":{"min":1,"max":null,"increment":1}}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":442203177039,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_191716e0-09f0-4969-bf75-a8cce104a858.jpg?v=1502734381","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 338\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credits\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalyze the case and its conclusion and decision. How was the question answered? Do you agree or disagree with that answer? \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e"}