$399.00 Webinar Special, all 26 hours for $399.00

{"id":7903750881494,"title":"#1 26 unit CD bundle 700 Series...All in One MCLE CDs..New","handle":"700-series-all-in-one-mcle-cds","description":"\u003cp\u003e700 series\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e26 hrs of mcle\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Ethics\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Elimination of Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Implicit Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ecds available\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e701 Worker's Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e702 Covid-19 Stay at Home Orders\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e703 Competency Cell Phone Addiction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e704 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e706 Elimination of Bias Transgender\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e707 Law Practice Management: Public Speaking\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e708 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Scotus Omicron\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFree Speech vs Canadian Truckers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e709 Appellate Decision in Trump vs Jan 6 Committee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e710 SCOTUS Dobb's vs Jackson, Women's Health..2 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e711 Ethical Competency \u0026amp; impairment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e712 Law Practice Management SWOT Analysis\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e713 SCOTUS Biden vs Missouri 4 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e715 Watergate US vs Nixon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e716 Covid-19 Vaccine \u0026amp; Mask Mandates vs Freedom of Speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e718 Ethics Shapero vs Kentucky Bar Assn..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e719 Ethics Wilner vs Committee on Character..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e720 Ethics Koningsberg vs State Bar of California..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e721 Technology: SCOTUS  Carpenter vs US\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e722 Technology SCOTUS Am Broad Cos vs Aereo Inc\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e734 Implicit Bias Workplace \u0026amp; Jury Selection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2022-10-31T10:30:00-07:00","created_at":"2022-10-25T21:32:46-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["#covid","#implicitbias","#ITlaw","#scotus","1st amendment","Audio CD","bias","calosha","competence-issues","competency","constitutional-law","credit-state_california","credit-state_new-york","education-law","elimination-of-bias","ethics","Format_OnDemand Video","general","Internet","internet technology","OnDemand","practical-skills","substance-abuse","substance-abuse-mental-health","Tria","trial-skills","workers-compensation","Workplace Injury"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43746261565654,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"100","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#1 26 unit CD bundle 700 Series...All in One MCLE CDs..New","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":454,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":19,"inventory_management":"shopify","inventory_policy":"continue","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":31480475189462,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.655,"height":553,"width":915,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871"},"aspect_ratio":1.655,"height":553,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screenshot_20220507-050351_1_2.png?v=1669956871","width":915}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e700 series\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e26 hrs of mcle\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Ethics\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Elimination of Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Implicit Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ecds available\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e701 Worker's Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e702 Covid-19 Stay at Home Orders\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e703 Competency Cell Phone Addiction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e704 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e706 Elimination of Bias Transgender\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e707 Law Practice Management: Public Speaking\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e708 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Scotus Omicron\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFree Speech vs Canadian Truckers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e709 Appellate Decision in Trump vs Jan 6 Committee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e710 SCOTUS Dobb's vs Jackson, Women's Health..2 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e711 Ethical Competency \u0026amp; impairment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e712 Law Practice Management SWOT Analysis\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e713 SCOTUS Biden vs Missouri 4 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e715 Watergate US vs Nixon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e716 Covid-19 Vaccine \u0026amp; Mask Mandates vs Freedom of Speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e718 Ethics Shapero vs Kentucky Bar Assn..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e719 Ethics Wilner vs Committee on Character..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e720 Ethics Koningsberg vs State Bar of California..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e721 Technology: SCOTUS  Carpenter vs US\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e722 Technology SCOTUS Am Broad Cos vs Aereo Inc\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e734 Implicit Bias Workplace \u0026amp; Jury Selection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":7979636261078,"title":"#1 26 unit MP3 bundle 700 Series...All in One MCLE ..New","handle":"1-26-unit-mp3-bundle-700-series-all-in-one-mcle-new","description":"\u003cp\u003e700 series\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e26 hrs of mcle\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Ethics\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Elimination of Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Implicit Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003emp3 available\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e701 Worker's Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e702 Covid-19 Stay at Home Orders\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e703 Competency Cell Phone Addiction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e704 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e706 Elimination of Bias Transgender\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e707 Law Practice Management: Public Speaking\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e708 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Scotus Omicron\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFree Speech vs Canadian Truckers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e709 Appellate Decision in Trump vs Jan 6 Committee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e710 SCOTUS Dobb's vs Jackson, Women's Health..2 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e711 Ethical Competency \u0026amp; impairment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e712 Law Practice Management SWOT Analysis\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e713 SCOTUS Biden vs Missouri 4 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e715 Watergate US vs Nixon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e716 Covid-19 Vaccine \u0026amp; Mask Mandates vs Freedom of Speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e718 Ethics Shapero vs Kentucky Bar Assn..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e719 Ethics Wilner vs Committee on Character..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e720 Ethics Koningsberg vs State Bar of California..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e721 Technology: SCOTUS  Carpenter vs US\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e722 Technology SCOTUS Am Broad Cos vs Aereo Inc\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e734 Implicit Bias Workplace \u0026amp; Jury Selection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2023-01-19T12:40:43-08:00","created_at":"2023-01-19T12:07:24-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"MP3","tags":["#covid","#implicitbias","#ITlaw","#scotus","1st amendment","Audio CD","bias","calosha","competence-issues","competency","constitutional-law","credit-state_california","credit-state_new-york","education-law","elimination-of-bias","ethics","Format_OnDemand Video","general","Internet","internet technology","OnDemand","practical-skills","substance-abuse","substance-abuse-mental-health","Tria","trial-skills","workers-compensation","Workplace Injury"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":43955166806230,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#1 26 unit MP3 bundle 700 Series...All in One MCLE ..New","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":39900,"weight":454,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-4,"inventory_management":"shopify","inventory_policy":"continue","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20220616_135051.jpg?v=1674159072"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20220616_135051.jpg?v=1674159072","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":31693389430998,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.196,"height":1690,"width":2021,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20220616_135051.jpg?v=1674159072"},"aspect_ratio":1.196,"height":1690,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20220616_135051.jpg?v=1674159072","width":2021}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e700 series\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e26 hrs of mcle\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4 Ethics\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Elimination of Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Implicit Bias\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003emp3 available\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e701 Worker's Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e702 Covid-19 Stay at Home Orders\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e703 Competency Cell Phone Addiction\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e704 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e706 Elimination of Bias Transgender\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e707 Law Practice Management: Public Speaking\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e708 Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Scotus Omicron\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFree Speech vs Canadian Truckers\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e709 Appellate Decision in Trump vs Jan 6 Committee\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e710 SCOTUS Dobb's vs Jackson, Women's Health..2 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e711 Ethical Competency \u0026amp; impairment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e712 Law Practice Management SWOT Analysis\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e713 SCOTUS Biden vs Missouri 4 hrs\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e715 Watergate US vs Nixon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e716 Covid-19 Vaccine \u0026amp; Mask Mandates vs Freedom of Speech\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e718 Ethics Shapero vs Kentucky Bar Assn..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e719 Ethics Wilner vs Committee on Character..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e720 Ethics Koningsberg vs State Bar of California..90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e721 Technology: SCOTUS  Carpenter vs US\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e722 Technology SCOTUS Am Broad Cos vs Aereo Inc\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90 min\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e734 Implicit Bias Workplace \u0026amp; Jury Selection\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":3998959304783,"title":"#1 675 Series.. 26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 675 SERIES---All New---","handle":"copy-of-26-unit-cle-cd-bundle-650-series","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"\u003eBundle\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cmeta name=\"generator\" content=\"Sheets\"\u003e\n\u003cstyle type=\"text\/css\"\u003e\u003c!--\ntd {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}\n--\u003e\u003c\/style\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" dir=\"ltr\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\"\u003e\n\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol width=\"506\"\u003e\u003c\/colgroup\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 641 Personal Injury Law: Telling Your Client's Story\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e David Asch Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 649 Forthcoming Commercial Cannabis Regulations\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Stephen Beede Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 650 Local Marijuana Policy\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 651 Marijuana Private Non-Profit Corporations\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 543 Real Estate Law: Partition Sales and Accounting Speaker\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStephen Beede Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 652 Medicinal Cannabis vs. Adult Use, Prop 420 vs. 64\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 548 Protecting Contractor Remedies\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLyle Solomon Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 653 Criminal Law Overview\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e Brian McGinity Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 655 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Erin Hill\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMichael Chastaine Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Identity \u0026amp; Expression in the Workplace\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Workplace Issues\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNatalie Bustamante Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 659 Criminal Law for Civil Litigators\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 654 Real Estate Disclosure Law\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Erin Hill\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDr Gloria Freeman\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 663 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 663 Law Practice Management\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlan Frumkin Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u0026quot;}\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWilliam Orr Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 665 Cannabis: The New Era of Enforcement After Proposition 64\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 665 Cannabis:  Enforcement After Proposition 64\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam Berns esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid Axelrod Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker John Ellison Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Stephen Beede Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Erin Hill\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 674 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Gloria Freeman\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones'\u0026quot;}\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Brad Dacus Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Brad Dacus Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 674 Representing Clients at a Social Security Administration Hearing\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Lyle Solomon Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Gloria Freeman\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"COURSE LIST\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Joel Primes Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 677 Immigration: \"Particular Social Group\" Asylum(Trump Era)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Asaad Hafeez esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 677 Immigration: \\\"Particular Social Group\\\" Asylum(Trump Era)\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Brian McGinity esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 670 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 682 Mock Trial of John Wilkes Booth for President Lincoln Assassination\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeakers William Orr Esq and Joel Primes Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 680 US Supreme Court Masterpiece Cake Shop vs Colorado Civil Rts Comm\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\" 683 US Supreme Court Bucklew vs. Precythe\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\nl","published_at":"2019-08-19T00:54:21-07:00","created_at":"2019-08-19T00:54:21-07:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"CD's","tags":["26 Hr","alternative-dispute-resolution","bankruptcy-restructuring","bundle-course","business-corporate-securities-law","cds","civil-rights","constitutional-law","construction-law","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","criminal-law","disability-social-security-law","discovery-e-discovery","elimination-of-bias","entertainment-law","ethics","family-matrimonial-law","immigration-law","intermediate","labor-employment-law","law-practice-management","marijuana-law","personal-injury-and-negligence","privacy-cybersecurity","real-estate","technology","workers-compensation"],"price":39900,"price_min":39900,"price_max":39900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":29766209699919,"title":"26 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","option1":"26 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"26 Unit - 675 SERIES","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#1 675 Series.. 26 Unit CLE CD Bundle - 675 SERIES---All New--- - 26 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","public_title":"26 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES","options":["26 Unit CLE Bundle - 675 SERIES"],"price":39900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":7,"inventory_management":"shopify","inventory_policy":"continue","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lincoln_4010d17d-8afb-4eff-b7be-b870c193e843.jpg?v=1566356507"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lincoln_4010d17d-8afb-4eff-b7be-b870c193e843.jpg?v=1566356507","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1787300020303,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.8,"height":705,"width":564,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lincoln_4010d17d-8afb-4eff-b7be-b870c193e843.jpg?v=1566356507"},"aspect_ratio":0.8,"height":705,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/lincoln_4010d17d-8afb-4eff-b7be-b870c193e843.jpg?v=1566356507","width":564}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e26 Hour CLE Package Includes\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4 Ethics, 1 Competency\/Substance Abuse and 1 Bias\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"\u003eBundle\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cmeta name=\"generator\" content=\"Sheets\"\u003e\n\u003cstyle type=\"text\/css\"\u003e\u003c!--\ntd {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}\n--\u003e\u003c\/style\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" dir=\"ltr\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\"\u003e\n\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol width=\"506\"\u003e\u003c\/colgroup\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 641 Personal Injury Law: Telling Your Client's Story\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e David Asch Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 649 Forthcoming Commercial Cannabis Regulations\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 648 Buying and Selling a California Law Firm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Stephen Beede Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 650 Local Marijuana Policy\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 651 Marijuana Private Non-Profit Corporations\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 543 Real Estate Law: Partition Sales and Accounting Speaker\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStephen Beede Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 652 Medicinal Cannabis vs. Adult Use, Prop 420 vs. 64\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 548 Protecting Contractor Remedies\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLyle Solomon Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 653 Criminal Law Overview\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e Brian McGinity Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 655 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 656 Cybersecurity Risk Management\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Erin Hill\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 657 Jury Selection in a Criminal Case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMichael Chastaine Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Identity \u0026amp; Expression in the Workplace\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 658 Elimination of Bias: Transgender Workplace Issues\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNatalie Bustamante Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 659 Criminal Law for Civil Litigators\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 653 Criminal Law Overview\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 654 Real Estate Disclosure Law\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 661 IT Law: Document Retention Policy(DRP)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Erin Hill\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 662 Competency: Substance Abuse, Mental Health \u0026amp; Disability\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDr Gloria Freeman\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 663 Law Practice Management\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 663 Law Practice Management\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlan Frumkin Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u0026quot;}\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 664 Workers' Compensation Update\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWilliam Orr Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 665 Cannabis: The New Era of Enforcement After Proposition 64\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 665 Cannabis:  Enforcement After Proposition 64\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam Berns esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid Axelrod Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 667 Winning Social Security at the Administrative Hearing\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker John Ellison Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 668 Serving as an Expert Witness\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Stephen Beede Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 669 Ethics: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube \u0026amp; Social Media\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Erin Hill\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 674 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Gloria Freeman\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value=\"{\u0026quot;1\u0026quot;:2,\u0026quot;2\u0026quot;:\u0026quot;Course 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones'\u0026quot;}\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 671 Bias \u0026amp; Competency\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Brad Dacus Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 672 Local Land Use \u0026amp; Eminent Domain, Eliminating 'No Church Zones\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Brad Dacus Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 674 Representing Clients at a Social Security Administration Hearing\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 673 Civil Law \u0026amp; Motion Procedures\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Lyle Solomon Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\"}'\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 675 Ethics: Competency \u0026amp; the Disbarment of Michael Cohen\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Dr Gloria Freeman\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"COURSE LIST\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Joel Primes Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 676 Ethics: 70 New Rules\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 677 Immigration: \"Particular Social Group\" Asylum(Trump Era)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Asaad Hafeez esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 677 Immigration: \\\"Particular Social Group\\\" Asylum(Trump Era)\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeaker Brian McGinity esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 670 Ethics: Attorneys vs Attorneys, #metoo, #timesup, #genderpaygap\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 682 Mock Trial of John Wilkes Booth for President Lincoln Assassination\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeakers William Orr Esq and Joel Primes Esq\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 679 Family Law, Domestic Violence and Criminal Law\"}'\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\"Course 680 US Supreme Court Masterpiece Cake Shop vs Colorado Civil Rts Comm\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd data-sheets-value='{\"1\":2,\"2\":\" 683 US Supreme Court Bucklew vs. Precythe\"}'\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\nl"}

{"id":2415754117199,"title":"#661 IT LAW: DOCUMENT\/DATA RETENTION POLICY (DRP)","handle":"661-it-law-data-retention-polices","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1551590086\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/188056784\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1551590086\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSPEAKER DR. ERIN HILL\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHOURS 1 HOUR MCLE, 60 minutes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTOPIC: IT LAW: DOCUMENT\/DATA RETENTION POLICY\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(meets the Technology requirements for Florida and NY)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY (DRP)\u003cbr\u003eMCLE Seminars: Ulrich Nash and Gump Legal Education\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSpeaker: Erin Hill, Professor at William Jessup University, in Rocklin, CA Attorney in California\u003cbr\u003e________________________________________________________________________\u003cbr\u003eAGENDA\/Outline:\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 1: REASONS TO ESTABLISH A DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY 10 to 1010\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 2: REVIEW CURRENT REGULATIONS 1010 to 1020\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 3: IDENTIFY DOCUMENTS \u0026amp; ASSIGN OWNERSHIP 1020 to 1040\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 4: DRAFT YOUR DATA RETENTION POLICY 1040 to 1050\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 5: TRAIN \u0026amp;; STAY CURRENT 1050 to 11 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCONCLUSION\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 1: REASONS TO ESTABLISH A DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY\u003cbr\u003eEstablishing a data retention policy (DRP) assists organizations with managing and\u003cbr\u003eprotecting important data to avoid any civil, criminal, and\/or financial penalties that may\u003cbr\u003eresult from poor data management practices. A DRP equips organizations with procedures\u003cbr\u003eto review, retain, and destroy documents possessed by or created in the course of business.\u003cbr\u003eLocal, state, federal and international policies, rules, statutes and laws, as well as industry-\u003cbr\u003eimposed regulations, specify the types of data that businesses must retain.\u003cbr\u003eFor example, the revised U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 37 on spoliation\u003cbr\u003eamplifies the importance of a clearly defined and enforced document retention policy\u003cbr\u003e(DRP). Additionally, these bodies set the length of time that specific types of data must be\u003cbr\u003eretained and maintained, along with the way in which that data is stored.\u003cbr\u003eInternationally, as of May 2018, Article 3 of the EU GDPR states that if a company\u003cbr\u003ecollects personal data or behavioral information from someone in an EU country when\u003cbr\u003edata is collected, your company is subject to the requirements of the GDPR which include\u003cbr\u003esignificant fines. U.S. companies, with a strong EU Web presence, should be changing \u003cbr\u003epractices now and implementing a sound data policy in response.\u003cbr\u003eA well-drafted policy will also identify documents that need to be preserved and\u003cbr\u003emaintained. It will further provide direction on how long to retain certain documents. A\u003cbr\u003ecomprehensive DRP that is enforced and followed by employees may be a lifesaver in the\u003cbr\u003eevent of burdensome litigation.\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 2: REVIEW CURRENT REGULATIONS\u003cbr\u003eReview state, federal, and industry specific rules\u003cbr\u003eA few regulatory bodies and acts that determine certain data retention durations and the\u003cbr\u003econditions of data removal include:\u003cbr\u003eA. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is related to\u003cbr\u003ethe healthcare industry and applies to healthcare organizations and any business\u003cbr\u003ethat works with those organizations.\u003cbr\u003eB. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) has its own provisions, related to the financial\u003cbr\u003eindustry.\u003cbr\u003eC. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) applies to every type of business in any\u003cbr\u003elocation of the United States.\u003cbr\u003eD. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is another act that applies\u003cbr\u003eto all businesses in the United States.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePage 2 of 4\u003cbr\u003eE. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to any company\u003cbr\u003ethat does business with a resident of one of the 28 EU’s 28 member states.\u003cbr\u003eF. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires certain SEC-\u003cbr\u003eregulated companies to keep emails for a minimum of three years (17 C.F.R. §\u003cbr\u003e240.17a-4).\u003cbr\u003eG. Determine whether your company's home state has adopted the Uniform\u003cbr\u003ePreservation of Private Business Records Act (UPPBRA), which includes a\u003cbr\u003edefinition of “business record.” If it does, include the term and definition in\u003cbr\u003eyour policy; this step will distinguish your DRP from documents that have\u003cbr\u003eno retention requirements. The UPPBRA states that whenever a law does not\u003cbr\u003especify a specific retention period then the business should keep their records for\u003cbr\u003ethree years.\u003cbr\u003eBuild Your Data Retention Policy Team\u003cbr\u003eYour data retention policy development team should include a legat and accounting\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eexperts to thoroughly research any relevant laws, policies and regulations that affect your\u003cbr\u003eindustry and jurisdiction. Your team should also include individuals who manage financial\u003cbr\u003ereports and\/or are responsible for data retention settings (IT).\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 3: IDENTIFY DOCUMENTS \u0026amp; ASSIGN OWNERSHIP\u003cbr\u003eIdentify what electronic and physical documents your business produces, and assign\u003cbr\u003eownership. Determine whether this records compliance responsibility should be an\u003cbr\u003eindividual or department.\u003cbr\u003eDefine the Data to Be Included in Your Data Retention Policy\u003cbr\u003eRegardless of your industry or location, there are some general types of data that you must\u003cbr\u003einclude within your data retention policy, including:\u003cbr\u003e Documents\u003cbr\u003e Emails and other electronic documents\u003cbr\u003e Customer records\u003cbr\u003e Transactional information\u003cbr\u003e Spreadsheets\u003cbr\u003e Contracts\u003cbr\u003e Spreadsheets\u003cbr\u003e Correspondence between staff and clients, agents, vendors, shareholders and the\u003cbr\u003epublic\u003cbr\u003e Supplier and partner data\u003cbr\u003e Employee records\u003cbr\u003e Customer records\u003cbr\u003e Sales, invoice and billing information\u003cbr\u003e Tax and accounting documentation\u003cbr\u003e Financial reports\u003cbr\u003e Healthcare and patient data\u003cbr\u003e Student and educational data\u003cbr\u003e Any other data produced, collected and maintained in the fulfillment of regular\u003cbr\u003ebusiness activities\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 4: DRAFT YOUR DATA RETENTION POLICY\u003cbr\u003eDraft your DAP once you have determined how to manage old data (remove or archive).\u003cbr\u003eYour data retention policy should include the following:\u003cbr\u003eA. Purpose\u003cbr\u003eB. Applicable Laws, Regulations, Policies, Rules and Acts\u003cbr\u003eC. Record Retention and Deletion Schedule\u003cbr\u003eD. Litigation Plan\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePage 3 of 4\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eE. Review and Update Schedule\u003cbr\u003eF. Detail instructions on storing, retaining, and preserving data\u003cbr\u003eDecide how to organize, where to store, how long to retain, and when to back up\u003cbr\u003edocuments. Describe the categories and types of documents that are confidential or\u003cbr\u003esensitive and cover the steps necessary to protect this type of information.\u003cbr\u003eSet guidelines on destroying expired or useless data. Once a document reaches its\u003cbr\u003eexpiration for retention, the policy needs to include details on how to handle data.\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 5: TRAIN \u0026amp;; STAY CURRENT\u003cbr\u003eTrain employees on the plan and communicate the processes. Training and implementing\u003cbr\u003ethe DRP should be strictly enforced with consequences for non-compliance. Go over\u003cbr\u003eindividuals responsible for enforcing, monitoring, and updating the policy. Address\u003cbr\u003eemployee document preservation and disposal protocol clearly and explicitly. Explain that\u003cbr\u003eemployees have no expectation of personal privacy in either communications they send or\u003cbr\u003ereceive through the company's email system, or documents they create or store on\u003cbr\u003ecompany equipment or premises. Discuss Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) to work and\u003cbr\u003eexplain the acceptable use (if any) of the following for conducting company business:\u003cbr\u003ehome computers, cloud storage, personal smart phones, personal email accounts, and\u003cbr\u003epersonal internet sites, blogs, and social media networks.\u003cbr\u003eCONCLUSION\u003cbr\u003eAs we have addressed above, establishing a data retention policy (DRP) assists\u003cbr\u003eorganizations with managing and protecting important data to avoid any civil, criminal,\u003cbr\u003eand\/or financial penalties that may result from poor data management practices. A DRP\u003cbr\u003eequips organizations with procedures to review, retain, and destroy documents possessed\u003cbr\u003eby or created in the course of business. A DRP assists organizations in removing outdated\u003cbr\u003eand duplicated data and creates an efficient use of storage space. The importance of\u003cbr\u003estaying current in today’s global business environment is paramount to remaining\u003cbr\u003ecompliant with local, state, federal and international policies, rules, statutes and laws, as\u003cbr\u003ewell as industry-imposed regulations with affect data retention management.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePage 4 of 4\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eREFERENCES\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e1. https:\/\/www.acc.com\/legalresources\/publications\/topten\/building-a-document-\u003cbr\u003eretention-policy.cfm\u003cbr\u003e2. https:\/\/www.nfib.com\/Portals\/0\/PDF\/AllUsers\/legal\/guides\/document-retention-\u003cbr\u003epolicy-guide-nfib.pdf\u003cbr\u003e3. https:\/\/irch.com\/create-data-retention-policy-template\/\u003cbr\u003e4. http:\/\/www.lawjournalnewsletters.com\/2018\/05\/01\/are-u-s-records-retention-\u003cbr\u003erequirements-on-a-collision-course-with-the-gdprs-right-to-\u003cbr\u003eerasure\/?slreturn=20181128211535\u003cbr\u003e5. https:\/\/www.ispartnersllc.com\/blog\/5-steps-developing-data-retention-policy\/\u003cbr\u003e6. https:\/\/templatesumo.com\/business\/data-retention-policy-template-the-essential-\u003cbr\u003eguide-to-gdpr\/\u003cbr\u003e7. https:\/\/privacysniffs.com\/data-retention-law\/united-states-of-america\/\u003cbr\u003e8. https:\/\/www.archives.gov\/files\/records-mgmt\/2019-perm-electronic-records-\u003cbr\u003esuccess-criteria.pdf\u003cbr\u003e9. https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/forbestechcouncil\/2017\/12\/04\/yes-the-gdpr-will-\u003cbr\u003eaffect-your-u-s-based-business\/#68a6efd16ff2\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eEXHIBIT WEBSITES\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBelow are websites that offer templates and other assistance with developing a DRP.\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2019-02-15T12:40:31-08:00","created_at":"2019-02-15T12:45:57-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["#Data","#internet","#ITlaw","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_florida","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","technology"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":5900,"compare_at_price_min":5900,"compare_at_price_max":5900,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21444545445967,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#661 IT LAW: DOCUMENT\/DATA RETENTION POLICY (DRP)","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":5900,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/NYScreen_Shot_2017-09-06_at_1.24.58_PM_1.png?v=1550263566"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/NYScreen_Shot_2017-09-06_at_1.24.58_PM_1.png?v=1550263566","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1213066739791,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.783,"height":618,"width":1102,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/NYScreen_Shot_2017-09-06_at_1.24.58_PM_1.png?v=1550263566"},"aspect_ratio":1.783,"height":618,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/NYScreen_Shot_2017-09-06_at_1.24.58_PM_1.png?v=1550263566","width":1102}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1551590086\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/188056784\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1551590086\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSPEAKER DR. ERIN HILL\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHOURS 1 HOUR MCLE, 60 minutes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTOPIC: IT LAW: DOCUMENT\/DATA RETENTION POLICY\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(meets the Technology requirements for Florida and NY)\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY (DRP)\u003cbr\u003eMCLE Seminars: Ulrich Nash and Gump Legal Education\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSpeaker: Erin Hill, Professor at William Jessup University, in Rocklin, CA Attorney in California\u003cbr\u003e________________________________________________________________________\u003cbr\u003eAGENDA\/Outline:\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 1: REASONS TO ESTABLISH A DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY 10 to 1010\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 2: REVIEW CURRENT REGULATIONS 1010 to 1020\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 3: IDENTIFY DOCUMENTS \u0026amp; ASSIGN OWNERSHIP 1020 to 1040\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 4: DRAFT YOUR DATA RETENTION POLICY 1040 to 1050\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 5: TRAIN \u0026amp;; STAY CURRENT 1050 to 11 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCONCLUSION\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 1: REASONS TO ESTABLISH A DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY\u003cbr\u003eEstablishing a data retention policy (DRP) assists organizations with managing and\u003cbr\u003eprotecting important data to avoid any civil, criminal, and\/or financial penalties that may\u003cbr\u003eresult from poor data management practices. A DRP equips organizations with procedures\u003cbr\u003eto review, retain, and destroy documents possessed by or created in the course of business.\u003cbr\u003eLocal, state, federal and international policies, rules, statutes and laws, as well as industry-\u003cbr\u003eimposed regulations, specify the types of data that businesses must retain.\u003cbr\u003eFor example, the revised U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 37 on spoliation\u003cbr\u003eamplifies the importance of a clearly defined and enforced document retention policy\u003cbr\u003e(DRP). Additionally, these bodies set the length of time that specific types of data must be\u003cbr\u003eretained and maintained, along with the way in which that data is stored.\u003cbr\u003eInternationally, as of May 2018, Article 3 of the EU GDPR states that if a company\u003cbr\u003ecollects personal data or behavioral information from someone in an EU country when\u003cbr\u003edata is collected, your company is subject to the requirements of the GDPR which include\u003cbr\u003esignificant fines. U.S. companies, with a strong EU Web presence, should be changing \u003cbr\u003epractices now and implementing a sound data policy in response.\u003cbr\u003eA well-drafted policy will also identify documents that need to be preserved and\u003cbr\u003emaintained. It will further provide direction on how long to retain certain documents. A\u003cbr\u003ecomprehensive DRP that is enforced and followed by employees may be a lifesaver in the\u003cbr\u003eevent of burdensome litigation.\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 2: REVIEW CURRENT REGULATIONS\u003cbr\u003eReview state, federal, and industry specific rules\u003cbr\u003eA few regulatory bodies and acts that determine certain data retention durations and the\u003cbr\u003econditions of data removal include:\u003cbr\u003eA. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is related to\u003cbr\u003ethe healthcare industry and applies to healthcare organizations and any business\u003cbr\u003ethat works with those organizations.\u003cbr\u003eB. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) has its own provisions, related to the financial\u003cbr\u003eindustry.\u003cbr\u003eC. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) applies to every type of business in any\u003cbr\u003elocation of the United States.\u003cbr\u003eD. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is another act that applies\u003cbr\u003eto all businesses in the United States.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePage 2 of 4\u003cbr\u003eE. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to any company\u003cbr\u003ethat does business with a resident of one of the 28 EU’s 28 member states.\u003cbr\u003eF. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires certain SEC-\u003cbr\u003eregulated companies to keep emails for a minimum of three years (17 C.F.R. §\u003cbr\u003e240.17a-4).\u003cbr\u003eG. Determine whether your company's home state has adopted the Uniform\u003cbr\u003ePreservation of Private Business Records Act (UPPBRA), which includes a\u003cbr\u003edefinition of “business record.” If it does, include the term and definition in\u003cbr\u003eyour policy; this step will distinguish your DRP from documents that have\u003cbr\u003eno retention requirements. The UPPBRA states that whenever a law does not\u003cbr\u003especify a specific retention period then the business should keep their records for\u003cbr\u003ethree years.\u003cbr\u003eBuild Your Data Retention Policy Team\u003cbr\u003eYour data retention policy development team should include a legat and accounting\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eexperts to thoroughly research any relevant laws, policies and regulations that affect your\u003cbr\u003eindustry and jurisdiction. Your team should also include individuals who manage financial\u003cbr\u003ereports and\/or are responsible for data retention settings (IT).\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 3: IDENTIFY DOCUMENTS \u0026amp; ASSIGN OWNERSHIP\u003cbr\u003eIdentify what electronic and physical documents your business produces, and assign\u003cbr\u003eownership. Determine whether this records compliance responsibility should be an\u003cbr\u003eindividual or department.\u003cbr\u003eDefine the Data to Be Included in Your Data Retention Policy\u003cbr\u003eRegardless of your industry or location, there are some general types of data that you must\u003cbr\u003einclude within your data retention policy, including:\u003cbr\u003e Documents\u003cbr\u003e Emails and other electronic documents\u003cbr\u003e Customer records\u003cbr\u003e Transactional information\u003cbr\u003e Spreadsheets\u003cbr\u003e Contracts\u003cbr\u003e Spreadsheets\u003cbr\u003e Correspondence between staff and clients, agents, vendors, shareholders and the\u003cbr\u003epublic\u003cbr\u003e Supplier and partner data\u003cbr\u003e Employee records\u003cbr\u003e Customer records\u003cbr\u003e Sales, invoice and billing information\u003cbr\u003e Tax and accounting documentation\u003cbr\u003e Financial reports\u003cbr\u003e Healthcare and patient data\u003cbr\u003e Student and educational data\u003cbr\u003e Any other data produced, collected and maintained in the fulfillment of regular\u003cbr\u003ebusiness activities\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 4: DRAFT YOUR DATA RETENTION POLICY\u003cbr\u003eDraft your DAP once you have determined how to manage old data (remove or archive).\u003cbr\u003eYour data retention policy should include the following:\u003cbr\u003eA. Purpose\u003cbr\u003eB. Applicable Laws, Regulations, Policies, Rules and Acts\u003cbr\u003eC. Record Retention and Deletion Schedule\u003cbr\u003eD. Litigation Plan\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePage 3 of 4\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eE. Review and Update Schedule\u003cbr\u003eF. Detail instructions on storing, retaining, and preserving data\u003cbr\u003eDecide how to organize, where to store, how long to retain, and when to back up\u003cbr\u003edocuments. Describe the categories and types of documents that are confidential or\u003cbr\u003esensitive and cover the steps necessary to protect this type of information.\u003cbr\u003eSet guidelines on destroying expired or useless data. Once a document reaches its\u003cbr\u003eexpiration for retention, the policy needs to include details on how to handle data.\u003cbr\u003ePOINT 5: TRAIN \u0026amp;; STAY CURRENT\u003cbr\u003eTrain employees on the plan and communicate the processes. Training and implementing\u003cbr\u003ethe DRP should be strictly enforced with consequences for non-compliance. Go over\u003cbr\u003eindividuals responsible for enforcing, monitoring, and updating the policy. Address\u003cbr\u003eemployee document preservation and disposal protocol clearly and explicitly. Explain that\u003cbr\u003eemployees have no expectation of personal privacy in either communications they send or\u003cbr\u003ereceive through the company's email system, or documents they create or store on\u003cbr\u003ecompany equipment or premises. Discuss Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) to work and\u003cbr\u003eexplain the acceptable use (if any) of the following for conducting company business:\u003cbr\u003ehome computers, cloud storage, personal smart phones, personal email accounts, and\u003cbr\u003epersonal internet sites, blogs, and social media networks.\u003cbr\u003eCONCLUSION\u003cbr\u003eAs we have addressed above, establishing a data retention policy (DRP) assists\u003cbr\u003eorganizations with managing and protecting important data to avoid any civil, criminal,\u003cbr\u003eand\/or financial penalties that may result from poor data management practices. A DRP\u003cbr\u003eequips organizations with procedures to review, retain, and destroy documents possessed\u003cbr\u003eby or created in the course of business. A DRP assists organizations in removing outdated\u003cbr\u003eand duplicated data and creates an efficient use of storage space. The importance of\u003cbr\u003estaying current in today’s global business environment is paramount to remaining\u003cbr\u003ecompliant with local, state, federal and international policies, rules, statutes and laws, as\u003cbr\u003ewell as industry-imposed regulations with affect data retention management.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePage 4 of 4\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eREFERENCES\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e1. https:\/\/www.acc.com\/legalresources\/publications\/topten\/building-a-document-\u003cbr\u003eretention-policy.cfm\u003cbr\u003e2. https:\/\/www.nfib.com\/Portals\/0\/PDF\/AllUsers\/legal\/guides\/document-retention-\u003cbr\u003epolicy-guide-nfib.pdf\u003cbr\u003e3. https:\/\/irch.com\/create-data-retention-policy-template\/\u003cbr\u003e4. http:\/\/www.lawjournalnewsletters.com\/2018\/05\/01\/are-u-s-records-retention-\u003cbr\u003erequirements-on-a-collision-course-with-the-gdprs-right-to-\u003cbr\u003eerasure\/?slreturn=20181128211535\u003cbr\u003e5. https:\/\/www.ispartnersllc.com\/blog\/5-steps-developing-data-retention-policy\/\u003cbr\u003e6. https:\/\/templatesumo.com\/business\/data-retention-policy-template-the-essential-\u003cbr\u003eguide-to-gdpr\/\u003cbr\u003e7. https:\/\/privacysniffs.com\/data-retention-law\/united-states-of-america\/\u003cbr\u003e8. https:\/\/www.archives.gov\/files\/records-mgmt\/2019-perm-electronic-records-\u003cbr\u003esuccess-criteria.pdf\u003cbr\u003e9. https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/forbestechcouncil\/2017\/12\/04\/yes-the-gdpr-will-\u003cbr\u003eaffect-your-u-s-based-business\/#68a6efd16ff2\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eEXHIBIT WEBSITES\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBelow are websites that offer templates and other assistance with developing a DRP.\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":2415797469263,"title":"#662 COMPETENCY: SUBSTANCE ABUSE, MENTAL ILLNESS \u0026 DISABILITY","handle":"competency-substance-abuse-mental-illness-disability","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1551590921\" p=\"\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eSPEAKER DR GLORIA FREEMAN, PHARM. D.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eABOUT: Dr. Gloria Freeman has a doctorate in pharmacy, is a licensed pharmacist and has worked as a clinical pharmacist in a variety of psychiatric facilities doing group counseling. She has worked  at Napa State Hospital, Sierra Vista Hospital, the Department of Corrections in San Quentin, Folsom, Mule Creek and more. She has worked at the Department of Veterans Affairs in Hawaii, Palo Alto, Maine, Utah to name a few. She has written 32 medical books including Drugs of Abuse, Drugs and Athletes. She has appeared on radio and TV in both the US and Canada talking about substance abuse and other medical issues. She has been involved in both legal and medical education and is a serial entrepreneur.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTOPIC: COMPETENCY: SUBSTANCE ABUSE, MENTAL ILLNESS \u0026amp; DISABILITY\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e60 minutes of MCLE\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e  TOP REASONS THAT ATTORNEYS MAY HAVE \u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOMPETENCY ISSUES, 4 pm to 410 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA.COMPETENCY DEFINED\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e SUBSTANCE ABUSE\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e MENTAL ILLNESS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e DISABILITY\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"2\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e SUBSTANCE ABUSE 4 10 pm to 420 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eALCOHOL (nearly 20 percent of attorneys have a drinking problem)\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eABUSE OF PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS  INCLUDING OPIATES, ANTIANXIETY AGENTS, PAIN MEDICATIONS, ETC\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e    C STREET DRUGS ie, METH, CRACK, COCAINE, HEROIN\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eMARIJUANA AND CBD OIL\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"3\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e MENTAL ILLNESS 420 pm to 430 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA, ANXIETY DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eB, PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e SCHIZOPHRENIA\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e MOOD DISORDERS, IE DEPRESSION, BIPOLAR DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e DEMENTIA\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e EATING DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"4\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e DISABILITY  430 to 440 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatutory Blindness\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003ePeople with statutory blindness have vision that is 20\/200 or worse, which severely hinders their ability to perform work duties. \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Long-Term Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA person who is expected to suffer from an illness for more than one year \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Terminal Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eTerminal illnesses in most cases render the patient incapacitated\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Severe Physical Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA severe illness such as cancer, diabetes, stroke,  and HIV\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eE Severe Mental Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eConditions such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, unipolar depression and anxiety, Parkinson’s, Alzheimers, Dementia as with all other illnesses\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cb\u003eF\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e. \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eRestricting Illness\/Impairment\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eEven if a condition does not completely incapacitate the patient, he or she may still be unable to perform their job duties due to the medical restrictions imposed by their condition \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Learning Disabilities\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eDyslexia. Dyslexia is perhaps the best known learning disability. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eADHD. Attention Deficit\/Hyperactivity Disorder has affected more than 6.4 million children at some point. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eDyscalculia. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eDysgraphia. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eProcessing Deficits.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"4\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e CASE STUDIES OF ATTORNEYS AND COMPETENCY ISSUES \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e440 to 450pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIn the Matter of Robert T. Rowe, A Suspended Attorney. Grievance Committee for the 2nd and 11th Judicial Districts 80 N.Y. 2d 336,604 N.E. 2d 728, 590 N.Y.S. 2d 179(1992) November 18 1992\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBakersfield Criminal Defense attorney, arrested for 3rd time on DUI charge(Bakersfield Now 8 31 2018)\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eProminent Lawyer arrested for DUI(Charleston, WV)\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e The Lawyer, the Addict\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"5\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e WHO TO CONTACT IF YOU HAVE A SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM 450 pm to 455 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"6\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e WHO TO CONTACT IF YOU HAVE A MENTAL ILLNESS 455 pm to 5 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"6\"\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2019-02-15T13:32:31-08:00","created_at":"2019-02-15T13:34:58-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["competence-issues","competency","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_florida","credit-state_nevada","Format_OnDemand Video","substance-abuse","substance-abuse-mental-health","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":5900,"compare_at_price_min":5900,"compare_at_price_max":5900,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21444644143183,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#662 COMPETENCY: SUBSTANCE ABUSE, MENTAL ILLNESS \u0026 DISABILITY","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":5900,"inventory_quantity":-1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/FB_IMG_1545364986465.jpg?v=1607370756"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/FB_IMG_1545364986465.jpg?v=1607370756","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":8186022232143,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.569,"height":612,"width":960,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/FB_IMG_1545364986465.jpg?v=1607370756"},"aspect_ratio":1.569,"height":612,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/FB_IMG_1545364986465.jpg?v=1607370756","width":960}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1551590921\" p=\"\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eSPEAKER DR GLORIA FREEMAN, PHARM. D.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eABOUT: Dr. Gloria Freeman has a doctorate in pharmacy, is a licensed pharmacist and has worked as a clinical pharmacist in a variety of psychiatric facilities doing group counseling. She has worked  at Napa State Hospital, Sierra Vista Hospital, the Department of Corrections in San Quentin, Folsom, Mule Creek and more. She has worked at the Department of Veterans Affairs in Hawaii, Palo Alto, Maine, Utah to name a few. She has written 32 medical books including Drugs of Abuse, Drugs and Athletes. She has appeared on radio and TV in both the US and Canada talking about substance abuse and other medical issues. She has been involved in both legal and medical education and is a serial entrepreneur.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTOPIC: COMPETENCY: SUBSTANCE ABUSE, MENTAL ILLNESS \u0026amp; DISABILITY\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e60 minutes of MCLE\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e  TOP REASONS THAT ATTORNEYS MAY HAVE \u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOMPETENCY ISSUES, 4 pm to 410 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA.COMPETENCY DEFINED\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e SUBSTANCE ABUSE\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e MENTAL ILLNESS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e DISABILITY\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"2\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e SUBSTANCE ABUSE 4 10 pm to 420 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eALCOHOL (nearly 20 percent of attorneys have a drinking problem)\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eABUSE OF PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS  INCLUDING OPIATES, ANTIANXIETY AGENTS, PAIN MEDICATIONS, ETC\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e    C STREET DRUGS ie, METH, CRACK, COCAINE, HEROIN\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eMARIJUANA AND CBD OIL\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"3\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e MENTAL ILLNESS 420 pm to 430 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA, ANXIETY DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eB, PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e SCHIZOPHRENIA\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e MOOD DISORDERS, IE DEPRESSION, BIPOLAR DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e DEMENTIA\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e EATING DISORDERS\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"4\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e DISABILITY  430 to 440 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatutory Blindness\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003ePeople with statutory blindness have vision that is 20\/200 or worse, which severely hinders their ability to perform work duties. \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Long-Term Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA person who is expected to suffer from an illness for more than one year \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Terminal Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eTerminal illnesses in most cases render the patient incapacitated\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Severe Physical Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eA severe illness such as cancer, diabetes, stroke,  and HIV\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eE Severe Mental Illness\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eConditions such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, unipolar depression and anxiety, Parkinson’s, Alzheimers, Dementia as with all other illnesses\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cb\u003eF\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e. \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eRestricting Illness\/Impairment\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eEven if a condition does not completely incapacitate the patient, he or she may still be unable to perform their job duties due to the medical restrictions imposed by their condition \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e Learning Disabilities\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eDyslexia. Dyslexia is perhaps the best known learning disability. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eADHD. Attention Deficit\/Hyperactivity Disorder has affected more than 6.4 million children at some point. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eDyscalculia. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eDysgraphia. ...\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400;\"\u003eProcessing Deficits.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"4\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e CASE STUDIES OF ATTORNEYS AND COMPETENCY ISSUES \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e440 to 450pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIn the Matter of Robert T. Rowe, A Suspended Attorney. Grievance Committee for the 2nd and 11th Judicial Districts 80 N.Y. 2d 336,604 N.E. 2d 728, 590 N.Y.S. 2d 179(1992) November 18 1992\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBakersfield Criminal Defense attorney, arrested for 3rd time on DUI charge(Bakersfield Now 8 31 2018)\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eProminent Lawyer arrested for DUI(Charleston, WV)\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e The Lawyer, the Addict\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"5\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e WHO TO CONTACT IF YOU HAVE A SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM 450 pm to 455 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"6\"\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cb\u003e WHO TO CONTACT IF YOU HAVE A MENTAL ILLNESS 455 pm to 5 pm\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003col start=\"6\"\u003e\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":2415828697167,"title":"#663- Law Practice Management - webinar","handle":"copy-of-copy-of-course-655-law-practice-management-webinar","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550271387\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186312646\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550271387\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Alan Frumkin, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 663 Law Practice Management \u003c\/strong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit, 60 minutes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLaw Practice Management\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGoal: \u003c\/strong\u003eTo understand how to do an intake of a new client in a law practice and manage your law practice in an efficient and cost effective manner\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline: \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1) Overview of Law Practice Management   11am to 1115 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2) How to do an intake of a new client  1115 to 1130 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3) How to manage your law practice in an efficient and cost effective manner 1130 to 1145 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4) Conclusion of Law Practice Management, 1145 to 12 noon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlan Frumkin Esq is a licensed attorney with over 40 years experience in private law practice\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2017-07-27T14:51:57-07:00","created_at":"2019-02-15T14:56:39-08:00","vendor":"aaroncle.com","type":"Webinar","tags":["advanced","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","discovery-e-discovery","single-course","technology","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21444809031759,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#663- Law Practice Management - webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screen_Shot_2017-09-07_at_10.05.28_AM.png?v=1550271791"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screen_Shot_2017-09-07_at_10.05.28_AM.png?v=1550271791","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1213206134863,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.702,"height":1948,"width":3316,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screen_Shot_2017-09-07_at_10.05.28_AM.png?v=1550271791"},"aspect_ratio":1.702,"height":1948,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Screen_Shot_2017-09-07_at_10.05.28_AM.png?v=1550271791","width":3316}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550271387\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186312646\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550271387\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Alan Frumkin, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 663 Law Practice Management \u003c\/strong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit, 60 minutes\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLaw Practice Management\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGoal: \u003c\/strong\u003eTo understand how to do an intake of a new client in a law practice and manage your law practice in an efficient and cost effective manner\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline: \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1) Overview of Law Practice Management   11am to 1115 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2) How to do an intake of a new client  1115 to 1130 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3) How to manage your law practice in an efficient and cost effective manner 1130 to 1145 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4) Conclusion of Law Practice Management, 1145 to 12 noon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlan Frumkin Esq is a licensed attorney with over 40 years experience in private law practice\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":2416347775055,"title":"#664- Workers Compensation Law: Case Review Update -Webinar","handle":"copy-of-course-602-workers-compensation-law-case-review-update-cd","description":"\u003cspan class=\"post_views ng-binding\" ng-show=\"selectedFeedData.data.views\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003cdiv data-custom-scroll=\"\" class=\"post_info_body ng-isolate-scope ss-container\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ss-wrapper show_scrollbar\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ss-content\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"post_info_details\"\u003e\n\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: William Orr, JD \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse: #664\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMCLE 1 hour \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTitle: Workers Compensation Law: Case Review Update\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eMr. Orr covers all the most recent cases in workers compensation.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eKey Points: \u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e1) Review of new Case Law including over 30 new cases  \u003ciframe height=\"360\" width=\"640\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186318767\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" id=\"ls_embed_1550341231\" allowfullscreen=\"\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341231\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: William Orr, JD\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse: #664\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMCLE 1 hour\u003cspan\u003e , 60 minutes\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTitle: Workers Compensation Law: Case Review Update\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eMr. Orr covers all the most recent cases in workers compensation.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eKey Points: \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e1) Review of new Case Law including over 30 new cases \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOutline\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e1) Overview of Workers Compensation Cases, 9 am to 910\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e2) Review of New Case Law including 30 new cases 910 to 9 50\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3) Conclusion 950 to 10am\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003eWilliam Orr has practiced Worker's Compensation law since 1981, at both the trial and appellate level.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2014-12-30T15:59:00-08:00","created_at":"2019-02-16T10:19:03-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["cds","clelaw","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_conenecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","single-course","workers-compensation"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21448190427215,"title":"Workers Compensation Law Case Review Course 602","option1":"Workers Compensation Law Case Review Course 602","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#664- Workers Compensation Law: Case Review Update -Webinar - Workers Compensation Law Case Review Course 602","public_title":"Workers Compensation Law Case Review Course 602","options":["Workers Compensation Law Case Review Course 602"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170725_134407_dfce3423-6826-42e6-8b8c-42877654c006.jpg?v=1550341144"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170725_134407_dfce3423-6826-42e6-8b8c-42877654c006.jpg?v=1550341144","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1214183342159,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":0.756,"height":2380,"width":1799,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170725_134407_dfce3423-6826-42e6-8b8c-42877654c006.jpg?v=1550341144"},"aspect_ratio":0.756,"height":2380,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170725_134407_dfce3423-6826-42e6-8b8c-42877654c006.jpg?v=1550341144","width":1799}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cspan class=\"post_views ng-binding\" ng-show=\"selectedFeedData.data.views\"\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003cdiv data-custom-scroll=\"\" class=\"post_info_body ng-isolate-scope ss-container\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ss-wrapper show_scrollbar\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ss-content\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"post_info_details\"\u003e\n\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: William Orr, JD \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse: #664\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMCLE 1 hour \u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTitle: Workers Compensation Law: Case Review Update\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eMr. Orr covers all the most recent cases in workers compensation.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eKey Points: \u003c\/span\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e1) Review of new Case Law including over 30 new cases  \u003ciframe height=\"360\" width=\"640\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186318767\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" id=\"ls_embed_1550341231\" allowfullscreen=\"\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341231\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: William Orr, JD\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse: #664\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMCLE 1 hour\u003cspan\u003e , 60 minutes\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTitle: Workers Compensation Law: Case Review Update\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eMr. Orr covers all the most recent cases in workers compensation.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\"\u003e\u003cspan color=\"#444444\"\u003eKey Points: \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e1) Review of new Case Law including over 30 new cases \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOutline\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e1) Overview of Workers Compensation Cases, 9 am to 910\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e2) Review of New Case Law including 30 new cases 910 to 9 50\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #000000;\" color=\"#444444\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e3) Conclusion 950 to 10am\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ng-binding\" ng-bind-html=\"selectedFeedData.data.description | description\"\u003eWilliam Orr has practiced Worker's Compensation law since 1981, at both the trial and appellate level.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":2415812280399,"title":"#665- - Cannabis in California: The New Era of Enforcement after Proposition 64","handle":"copy-of-course-649-marijuana-law-forthcoming-commercial-cannabis-regulations-webinar","description":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550269370\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186325694\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550269370\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Sam Berns, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 665\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"zype_599de52ec6aac3150d00052e\" style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 300px; max-width: 560px;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCannabis in California – The New Era of\u003cbr\u003eEnforcement after Prop 64\u003cbr\u003eSamuel D. Berns\u003cbr\u003eAttorney at Law\u003cbr\u003esam@bernslegal.com\u003cbr\u003e916.226.1477 or 530.212.0468\u003cbr\u003ewww.bernslegal.com\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline:\u003cbr\u003e1) Proposition 64 Overview ,....3pm to 310 pm\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eVoter Initiative Passed in 2018.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLegalized Recreational Cannabis – personal amounts now\u003cbr\u003elegal for all adults.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCreated a new system of licensing for commercial cannabis.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eReduced or eliminated criminal penalties for most cannabis\u003cbr\u003ecrimes, with means of post-conviction relief.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e2) Proposition 64 - Legal Penalties and Fines, 310 pm to 330 pm\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eStill felony penalties in certain circumstances, and for related\u003cbr\u003ecrimes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eEliminates some of the major affirmative defenses.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eResulted in marked increase in local administrative and civil fines.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNew avenues for administrative fines from Department of Fish and\u003cbr\u003eWildlife and other agencies.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e3) Proposition 64 Did Not Make Cannibas Legal (330 pm to 340 pm)\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eMake cannabis “legal,” except in very small amounts.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn some respects, more “illegal” than ever before.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eElimination of collective – HS 11362.775.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eReduced Criminal Penalties\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4) New Laws Explained 340 pm to 4 pm\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHS 11357 – Over 21 can have 1oz cannabis flower\/8g concentrate, with\u003cbr\u003eno penalties; reduced penalties for under 21 as well.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHS 11358 – Cultivation of up to six plants legal for adults; higher levels\u003cbr\u003eof cultivation now a misdemeanor in most cases.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHS 11359 – Possession for sale now a misdemeanor in most cases.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHS 11360 – Transportation now a misdemeanor in most cases.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cem\u003eSam Berns is an attorney in Rocklin, California, with extensive experience on criminal cannabis cases and cannabis businesses. He has spoken on Marijuana law for a number of seminars and is a member of several cannabis advocacy groups in his area.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2017-07-31T09:39:02-07:00","created_at":"2019-02-15T14:08:40-08:00","vendor":"aaroncle.com","type":"Webinar","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","intermediate","marijuana-law","single-course","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21444702961743,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#665- - Cannabis in California: The New Era of Enforcement after Proposition 64","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_8b1081fa-1374-4717-a945-1da0a3b0bc80.jpg?v=1550268521"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_8b1081fa-1374-4717-a945-1da0a3b0bc80.jpg?v=1550268521","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1213147414607,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.297,"height":1217,"width":1579,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_8b1081fa-1374-4717-a945-1da0a3b0bc80.jpg?v=1550268521"},"aspect_ratio":1.297,"height":1217,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/20170728_100131_8b1081fa-1374-4717-a945-1da0a3b0bc80.jpg?v=1550268521","width":1579}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cmeta charset=\"utf-8\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550269370\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186325694\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550269370\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Sam Berns, Esq\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 665\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"zype_599de52ec6aac3150d00052e\" style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 300px; max-width: 560px;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCannabis in California – The New Era of\u003cbr\u003eEnforcement after Prop 64\u003cbr\u003eSamuel D. Berns\u003cbr\u003eAttorney at Law\u003cbr\u003esam@bernslegal.com\u003cbr\u003e916.226.1477 or 530.212.0468\u003cbr\u003ewww.bernslegal.com\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline:\u003cbr\u003e1) Proposition 64 Overview ,....3pm to 310 pm\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eVoter Initiative Passed in 2018.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLegalized Recreational Cannabis – personal amounts now\u003cbr\u003elegal for all adults.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCreated a new system of licensing for commercial cannabis.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eReduced or eliminated criminal penalties for most cannabis\u003cbr\u003ecrimes, with means of post-conviction relief.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e2) Proposition 64 - Legal Penalties and Fines, 310 pm to 330 pm\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eStill felony penalties in certain circumstances, and for related\u003cbr\u003ecrimes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eEliminates some of the major affirmative defenses.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eResulted in marked increase in local administrative and civil fines.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNew avenues for administrative fines from Department of Fish and\u003cbr\u003eWildlife and other agencies.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e3) Proposition 64 Did Not Make Cannibas Legal (330 pm to 340 pm)\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eMake cannabis “legal,” except in very small amounts.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn some respects, more “illegal” than ever before.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eElimination of collective – HS 11362.775.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eReduced Criminal Penalties\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4) New Laws Explained 340 pm to 4 pm\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHS 11357 – Over 21 can have 1oz cannabis flower\/8g concentrate, with\u003cbr\u003eno penalties; reduced penalties for under 21 as well.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHS 11358 – Cultivation of up to six plants legal for adults; higher levels\u003cbr\u003eof cultivation now a misdemeanor in most cases.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHS 11359 – Possession for sale now a misdemeanor in most cases.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHS 11360 – Transportation now a misdemeanor in most cases.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cem\u003eSam Berns is an attorney in Rocklin, California, with extensive experience on criminal cannabis cases and cannabis businesses. He has spoken on Marijuana law for a number of seminars and is a member of several cannabis advocacy groups in his area.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":2416356393039,"title":"#666- Successful Litigation Strategies - webinar","handle":"copy-of-course-667-labor-and-employment-law-update-webinar","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: David Axelrod, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 666\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSuccessful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550341792\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186329985\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341792\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\" style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 300px; max-width: 560px;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"https:\/\/play.zype.com\/javascripts\/subscription_embed.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\/\/ \u003c![CDATA[\nzype.siteId = \"nQxMdqycvGlSxCakHpT8PxDR0kioTqyjOFzvwxWYfB4sPJRZiUgKfxTTcZx1bgGx\";zype.videoId = \"599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\";zype.videoEmbed(\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\");\n\/\/ ]]\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e \n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\" style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 300px; max-width: 560px;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"https:\/\/play.zype.com\/javascripts\/subscription_embed.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\/\/ \u003c![CDATA[\nzype.siteId = \"nQxMdqycvGlSxCakHpT8PxDR0kioTqyjOFzvwxWYfB4sPJRZiUgKfxTTcZx1bgGx\";zype.videoId = \"599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\";zype.videoEmbed(\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\");\n\/\/ ]]\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 hour of MCLE, 60 minutes \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course will explore past practice and current trends in  successful litigation managment in labor, employment, discrimination, personal injury, intentional torts, and civil rights law \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline :\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Examine the similarities and differences between past practice and current trends 11 am to 115 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2 Study the pros and cons of each, and why they were or are being widely practiced 1115 am to 1140 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3 Identify the many other areas of law that intersect and are affected by labor and employment law 1140 am to 12 noon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDavid Axelrod, B.S., J.D., Attorney at Law, graduated from the University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law, 1988. He has been a practicing attorney and member of the California State Bar since 1988.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2017-07-28T14:23:55-07:00","created_at":"2019-02-16T10:28:33-08:00","vendor":"aaroncle.com","type":"Webinar","tags":["aaroncle-com","beginner","credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","general","labor-employment-law","single-course","webinar"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21448225259599,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#666- Successful Litigation Strategies - webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_db443c35-7838-45d4-9d99-ca6468c1ca28.jpg?v=1550341714"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_db443c35-7838-45d4-9d99-ca6468c1ca28.jpg?v=1550341714","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1214195662927,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.654,"height":2476,"width":4096,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_db443c35-7838-45d4-9d99-ca6468c1ca28.jpg?v=1550341714"},"aspect_ratio":1.654,"height":2476,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_db443c35-7838-45d4-9d99-ca6468c1ca28.jpg?v=1550341714","width":4096}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: David Axelrod, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 666\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSuccessful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550341792\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186329985\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341792\" type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\" style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 300px; max-width: 560px;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"https:\/\/play.zype.com\/javascripts\/subscription_embed.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\/\/ \u003c![CDATA[\nzype.siteId = \"nQxMdqycvGlSxCakHpT8PxDR0kioTqyjOFzvwxWYfB4sPJRZiUgKfxTTcZx1bgGx\";zype.videoId = \"599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\";zype.videoEmbed(\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\");\n\/\/ ]]\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e \n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\" style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 300px; max-width: 560px;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"https:\/\/play.zype.com\/javascripts\/subscription_embed.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\"\u003e\/\/ \u003c![CDATA[\nzype.siteId = \"nQxMdqycvGlSxCakHpT8PxDR0kioTqyjOFzvwxWYfB4sPJRZiUgKfxTTcZx1bgGx\";zype.videoId = \"599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\";zype.videoEmbed(\"zype_599dfe60b0cc5b15c00014e8\");\n\/\/ ]]\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourse 666 Successful Litigation Strategies\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 hour of MCLE, 60 minutes \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course will explore past practice and current trends in  successful litigation managment in labor, employment, discrimination, personal injury, intentional torts, and civil rights law \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline :\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1 Examine the similarities and differences between past practice and current trends 11 am to 115 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2 Study the pros and cons of each, and why they were or are being widely practiced 1115 am to 1140 am\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3 Identify the many other areas of law that intersect and are affected by labor and employment law 1140 am to 12 noon\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDavid Axelrod, B.S., J.D., Attorney at Law, graduated from the University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law, 1988. He has been a practicing attorney and member of the California State Bar since 1988.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCall 916 652 3000 to enroll.\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":2416350691407,"title":"#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--Webinar","handle":"copy-of-course-532-winning-claimants-social-security-benefits-mp3","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jonathan Ellison, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 667\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186321928\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003e1 hour of MCLE or 60 minutes\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003eOutline:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Evaluating the case - claimant eligibility, 2 pm to 215 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. What must be proved 215 pm to 230 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. SSA Sequential Evaluation 230 pm to 240pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Written Advocacy - Hearing 240 pm to 250 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Attorney Fees 250 pm to 3 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn the steps an attorney should take to represent a client who has been wrongfully denied federal disability benefits\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to represent a client looking to obtain disability insurance and\/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJonathan Ellison is an attorney in private practice in the Sacramento area with expertise in disabled peoples' rights, elder law, social security, and housing law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2017-08-04T16:26:30-07:00","created_at":"2019-02-16T10:21:43-08:00","vendor":"Aaron \u0026 Aaron Inc. (dba Ulrich, Nash \u0026 Gump) CLE","type":"Webinar","tags":["credit-state_alabama","credit-state_alaska","credit-state_arizona","credit-state_california","credit-state_colorado","credit-state_connecticut","credit-state_delaware","credit-state_florida","credit-state_georgia","credit-state_missouri","credit-state_nevada","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","credit-state_pennslyvania","credit-state_texas","credit-state_vermont","disability-social-security-law","general","intermediate","mp3","single-course"],"price":5900,"price_min":5900,"price_max":5900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":21448205959247,"title":"Default Title","option1":"Default Title","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--Webinar","public_title":null,"options":["Default Title"],"price":5900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":1,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":1214187339855,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"width":800,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304"},"aspect_ratio":1.653,"height":484,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_595254203s_800x_f104380f-912c-4e2f-bbeb-960461d66508.jpg?v=1550341304","width":800}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpeaker: Jonathan Ellison, JD\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCourse 667\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1 hour MCLE Credit\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ciframe id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/8528637\/videos\/186321928\/player?width=640\u0026amp;height=360\u0026amp;enableInfo=true\u0026amp;defaultDrawer=\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\u003e \u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003cscript type=\"text\/javascript\" data-embed_id=\"ls_embed_1550341341\" src=\"https:\/\/livestream.com\/assets\/plugins\/referrer_tracking.js\"\u003e\u003c\/script\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'San Francisco', 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em;\"\u003e#667- Winning at the Social Security Administrative Hearing--\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003e1 hour of MCLE or 60 minutes\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 19.6px;\"\u003eOutline:\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Evaluating the case - claimant eligibility, 2 pm to 215 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. What must be proved 215 pm to 230 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. SSA Sequential Evaluation 230 pm to 240pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Written Advocacy - Hearing 240 pm to 250 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5. Attorney Fees 250 pm to 3 pm\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObjectives:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearn the steps an attorney should take to represent a client who has been wrongfully denied federal disability benefits\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstand how to represent a client looking to obtain disability insurance and\/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJonathan Ellison is an attorney in private practice in the Sacramento area with expertise in disabled peoples' rights, elder law, social security, and housing law.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":448454575,"title":"17 CLE Credits - Webinar--500 Series","handle":"17-cle-credits-webinar-500-series-279-00","description":"\u003ch1\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e17 MCLE Credits\/Hrs\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/h1\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewww.aaroncle.com\u003ciframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"http:\/\/new.livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/3661660\/player?width=560\u0026amp;height=315\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" gt=\"\" lt=\"\" iframe=\"\"\u003e\u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-31T10:24:00-08:00","created_at":"2015-01-31T10:24:01-08:00","vendor":"clelaw","type":"Webinar","tags":["clelaw","credit-state_california","credit-state_florida","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","Format_Audio CD","Format_MP3","Format_OnDemand Video","OnDemand","webinar"],"price":27900,"price_min":27900,"price_max":27900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":1147463471,"title":"aaron cle","option1":"aaron cle","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"500 Series Webinar","requires_shipping":false,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"17 CLE Credits - Webinar--500 Series - aaron cle","public_title":"aaron cle","options":["aaron cle"],"price":27900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":0,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1.png?v=1509556621","\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/covercomptab_901d5600-a414-419f-b00b-666225735ba8.jpg?v=1494181725","\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_371869798_cc6e22b3-2334-4624-bcce-b194aef2bbe3.jpg?v=1550270156","\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140_70d88e20-9a96-444a-841e-69fa74027986.jpg?v=1550270273"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1.png?v=1509556621","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":12993691727,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.537,"height":750,"width":1153,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1.png?v=1509556621"},"aspect_ratio":1.537,"height":750,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/newpicformat1.png?v=1509556621","width":1153},{"alt":null,"id":12993724495,"position":2,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.639,"height":687,"width":1126,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/covercomptab_901d5600-a414-419f-b00b-666225735ba8.jpg?v=1494181725"},"aspect_ratio":1.639,"height":687,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/covercomptab_901d5600-a414-419f-b00b-666225735ba8.jpg?v=1494181725","width":1126},{"alt":null,"id":12993757263,"position":3,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.499,"height":667,"width":1000,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_371869798_cc6e22b3-2334-4624-bcce-b194aef2bbe3.jpg?v=1550270156"},"aspect_ratio":1.499,"height":667,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_371869798_cc6e22b3-2334-4624-bcce-b194aef2bbe3.jpg?v=1550270156","width":1000},{"alt":null,"id":12993790031,"position":4,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":2008,"width":3012,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140_70d88e20-9a96-444a-841e-69fa74027986.jpg?v=1550270273"},"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":2008,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/shutterstock_614271140_70d88e20-9a96-444a-841e-69fa74027986.jpg?v=1550270273","width":3012}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003ch1\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #444444;\"\u003e17 MCLE Credits\/Hrs\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/h1\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewww.aaroncle.com\u003ciframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"http:\/\/new.livestream.com\/accounts\/10812142\/events\/3661660\/player?width=560\u0026amp;height=315\u0026amp;autoPlay=true\u0026amp;mute=false\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" gt=\"\" lt=\"\" iframe=\"\"\u003e\u003c\/iframe\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e"}

{"id":436371031,"title":"17 Unit CLE Audio CD Bundle - 347 SERIES","handle":"17-unit-cle-bundle-345-series","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e17 Hour CLE Package Includes 17 hours of any of the following selections:\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"\u003eBundle 347\u003c\/strong\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #277\u003c\/b\u003e: \u003c\/b\u003eSubstance Abuse: Neurochemistry of Addition and Recovery\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHave you ever wondered how a physical substance like a psychoactive drug can change a mental or emotional state? To understand how this can happen, it may be helpful to know that all mental and emotional states are, in part, just manifestations of our brain chemistry. Slight changes in the levels and activities of certain brain chemicals (called neurotransmitters) can make for noticeable and sometimes dramatic changes in our moods and our thinking. The human brain is a collection of about three \u003cem\u003etrillion\u003c\/em\u003e cells called \u003cem\u003eneurons\u003c\/em\u003e, long, thin electrically-charged chemical-filled wire-like cells with electrochemical contacts on each end. Unlike other areas of our body where cells physically connect to each other, no two neurons actually touch. Neurons can only act collectively if they are able to communicate with and affect the action of other neurons. They communicate by releasing chemical signals accross the gaps that lie between them. (called synapses).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eScience has so far identified about 80 chemicals (called \u003cem\u003eneurotransmitters\u003c\/em\u003e) in the human brain. Each of us has the same 80-odd neurotransmitters. These brain chemicals tend to function in a fairly task-specific way - accounting for a limited number of actions and effects depending on which part of the brain the neurochemical activity is taking place.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCOURSE #301\u003c\/b\u003e: Hidden Estate Decimators - Income In Respect Of A Decedent\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe House Ways and Means Committee released a draft of a tax plan that would raise the highest income tax rate by 4.3 % to 39.3%. By 2010 the highest income tax rate would excel to 44% after 2010.  This would lift the Federal Income Tax Higher than it’s been since 1976.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnd get this:  For families with incomes between $250K and 500K the “marginal” tax rate paid on the next dollar of earned income could sour to 80%, or some cases above 100%.  In other words, some Americans could pay $1 in taxes for every $1 they earn under the House tax plan.  This means that the income taxes paid by the top 1% would go to 40% of all paid taxes of the entire tax paying population.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following discussion will show you how to mitigate the brutality of the Hidden Estate Decimator\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #302\u003c\/b\u003e: Effective Estate And Tax Planning\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence.  That would include Federal Estate and Gift tax, Income tax, and Property tax and State probate law.  Making even more complicated; however, is ERISA. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePassed in 1974 it created retirement accounts.  Jack will now take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to “to do them right the first time. Rarely is there a second chance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #303\u003c\/b\u003e: Essential Keys To Probate Calendar Notes To Judgment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHow many calendars are you currently using in your legal practice? How well have you organized them?  Ultimate calendar control means no missed deadline or appointments.  James Mikacich, a highly experienced probate attorney, will show you how to take control of critical areas that often fall through the cracks.  His system will allow you quickly and efficiently manage your notes all the way to judgment....every time!\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #304\u003c\/b\u003e: How To Successfully Handle A Personal Injury Case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHandling a P.I. cases isn’t rocket science, but you have to do it right.  Assuming you get your first P.I., what do you do with it?  Discover the secrets of one of California’s most eminent P.I. attorneys, as he takes you on a tour of the classic pitfalls of uncorrectable sin of sins that can bury your practice in an instant.  So come join us for this revealing lecture that you can’t afford to miss.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #305\u003c\/b\u003e: Critical Essentials Of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover Advanced Estate Planning Techniques beyond the Basics of Estate Planning Trusts. This course covers Generation Skipping Transfers, Spousal Trusts,  Survivors Trusts, Marital Deduction Trusts, Bypass Trusts, and  Unified Credits at the Death of First Spouse. This will assist with Estate Planning for Multigenerational gifting, leaving property in Trusts and Generation Skipping Transfer Taxes.  Revocable Trusts A\/B\/C\/D Arrangements are also included.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #306\u003c\/b\u003e: Bias: How To Do A Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTen years ago, the EEOC issued a policy on sexual harassment, including how to investigate complaints of sexual harassment. This discussion will present the EEOC's advice and offer suggestions for conducting investigations, based on the case law. Keep in mind that both the EEOC's policy recommendations and the following discussion of it apply equally to all forms of unlawful harassment, such as race, age, disability, religion, etc. harassment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #307\u003c\/b\u003e: How To Use Government Benefits To Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaphne completed her undergraduate degree at the University of Chicago and her J.D. degree at the University of California, Berkeley.  She brings to the table 20 plus years of in-depth experience.  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course is a rich resource that gives you the facts you need to know to make relevant family law decisions.  Want to know who qualifies for SSI or Title 11?  Need critical insights on how the Family Benefits Program works?  How much income can a family expect to receive and much, much more?  Come join us for her informative and insightful must-have lecture offering practical insights that can help your case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #308\u003c\/b\u003e: Winning Techniques To Cross Examine During Trial\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHave you ever found yourself “on the spot,” forced to respond to difficult questions? Regardless of whether the questions came from clients inquiring about their cases, from a senior partner asking about a brief you wrote, or from a judge cross examining you during a motion hearing, it’s always a frustrating experience when you’re asked difficult questions that you haven’t anticipated and aren’t fully prepared to answer.  How can you do that when you have no idea what to say and desperately need a few extra moments to gather your thoughts? \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere are some simple techniques you can use to buy that extra time ou need before responding to a difficult question.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #311\u003c\/b\u003e: Honing Your Skills For Trial Preparation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA winning preparation is key to your successful case strategy.  This includes correctly lining up your expert witneses, deterining causation, interviewing the witnesses and and closely examing  each and every detail of your Case.  What if you win your case and it is appealed to the Administrative Procedures?   Can it be overturned?  What is your next option?   Come join us for this compelling real life case. The answer may surprise you.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #313\u003c\/b\u003e: Winning A Personal Injury Case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid Asch takes you behind closed doors and unlocks the secrets of more than 20 years of hard won experience to give you his valuable input.  Each point is loaded a wealth of information that keeps you ahead of the game.  You'll discover critical rules to operate by such as:  problems to avoid when filling out the proper forms, what to do when your client has no auto insurance, what other problems does the client have when they can’t afford insurance?  Uninsured Motorist Coverage;  The effects of underinsured motorists on your case and your client, maximizing your clients claim, important insights to the holy grail for the defense, critical elements  to put into your fee agreements, how a conflict of interest agreement can protect you and your client and much more\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #314\u003c\/b\u003e: How Will The North American Union Effect Your Law Practice\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHow will an economic and political union of Canada, U.S.A. and Mexico integrate the legal systems, common law and civil law, of all three countries?   What kind of supranational entities will be utilized to assure its success?  How will this change the economic and political infrastructure to give birth to a new super state much like the European Union?  More importantly,  what will the role of the judicial systems of each country play to bring about uniformity of law and eventual political integration of all three states called the North American Union?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCome join us for this provocative presentation by Hector Gonzales, a successful Mexican attorney, as he discusses the issues and answers that will possibly could realize the once bold vision of Simon Bolivar and the father of the European Union Jean Monet to the North American continent\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #315\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Practice law with integrity Part 1\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid you know that every year, hundreds of attorneys are brought up on ethics violation charges? If you’ve got “dirty laundry in your ethical closet, the cost of defending yourself may far exceed anything you’ve imaged, including your license to practice law. Joel Primes uses his experience as an administrative law judge to show you how to avoid potential pitfalls, disgrace, and the ongoing consequences to your law practice.  Moreover, his invaluable insights, humor with arm you with vital information to keep your firm clean, strong and prosperous for years to come.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #316\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Practice law with integrity Part 2\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid you know that every year, hundreds of attorneys are brought up on ethics violation charges? If you’ve got “dirty laundry in your ethical closet, the cost of defending yourself may far exceed anything you’ve imaged, including your license to practice law. Joel Primes uses his experience as an administrative law judge to show you how to avoid potential pitfalls, disgrace, and the ongoing consequences to your law practice.  Moreover, his invaluable insights, humor with arm you with vital information to keep your firm clean, strong and prosperous for years to come.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #317\u003c\/b\u003e: When, Why And How To Use A Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e When and how should you bifurcate? The practice of bifurcating a case has its advantages.  It can accelerate a resolution of one aspect of the case while providing an opportunity for the court to resolve the overall case, thus making it conducive to expedition and economy.  Thus allowing the court to order a separate trial of any cause of action…. or any separate issue or any number of causes of action or issues.  This lecture is highly beneficial to providing practical skill and understanding in successfully undertaking this action.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #318\u003c\/b\u003e: Estate Plans: The Grand Tour Of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence.  That would include Federal Estate and Gift tax, Income tax, and Property tax and State probate law.  Making even more complicated; however, is ERISA.  Passed in 1974, it created retirement accounts.  Jack will now take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to do them right the first time. Rarely is there a second chance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #319\u003c\/b\u003e: Estate Plans: The Grand Tour Of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence.  That would include Federal Estate and Gift tax, Income tax, and Property tax and State probate law.  Making even more complicated; however, is ERISA.  Passed in 1974, it created retirement accounts.  Jack will now take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to do them right the first time. Rarely is there a second chance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #320\u003c\/b\u003e: How You Can Win With Post Trial Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe long jury trial has now come to an end and your worst fears are realized as the jury renders a verdict that hammers your client.  What to do?  Appeal might be possible but there is a quicker solution – the post trial Motion for a New Trial and Motion for Judgment notwithstanding the Verdict.  This class will cover both of these Motions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #330\u003c\/b\u003e: Construction Contracts:  AIA Vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. Learn how to effectively adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects, how to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert.  You’ll also learn how minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people and the right drafting priorities.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #331\u003c\/b\u003e: Projects Gone Bad And The Litigation That Follows\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA Continuation of Course # 330\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. Learn how to effectively adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects, how to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert.  You’ll also learn how minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people and the right drafting priorities.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #334\u003c\/b\u003e: Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Courrt\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Can the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2002 Lakhdar Boumediene and five other Algerian natives were seized by Bosnian police when U.S. intelligence officers suspected their involvement in a plot to attack the U.S. embassy there. The U.S. government classified the men as enemy combatants in the war on terror and detained them at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, which is located on land that the U.S. leases from Cuba. Boumediene filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging violations of the Constitution's Due Process Clause, various statutes and treaties, the common law, and international law. The District Court judge granted the government's motion to have all of the claims dismissed on the ground that Boumediene, as an alien detained at an overseas military base, had no right to a habeas petition. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal but the Supreme Court reversed in Rasul v. Bush, which held that the habeas statute extends to non-citizen detainees at Guantanamo.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2006, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA). The Act eliminates federal courts' jurisdiction to hear habeas applications from detainees who have been designated (according to procedures established in the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005) as enemy combatants. When the case was appealed to the D.C. Circuit for the second time, the detainees argued that the MCA did not apply to their petitions, and that if it did, it was unconstitutional under the Suspension Clause. The Suspension Clause reads: \"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the government on both points. It cited language in the MCA applying the law to \"all cases, without exception\" that pertain to aspects of detention. One of the purposes of the MCA, according to the Circuit Court, was to overrule the Supreme Court's opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which had allowed petitions like Boumediene's to go forward. The D.C. Circuit held that the Suspension Clause only protects the writ of habeas corpus as it existed in 1789, and that the writ would not have been understood in 1789 to apply to an overseas military base leased from a foreign government. Constitutional rights do not apply to aliens outside of the United States, the court held, and the leased military base in Cuba does not qualify as inside the geographic borders of the U.S. In a rare reversal, the Supreme Court granted certiorari after initially denying review three months earlier.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Can the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA five-justice majority answered yes to each of these questions. The opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated that if the MCA is considered valid its legislative history requires that the detainees' cases be dismissed. However, the Court went on to state that because the procedures laid out in the Detainee Treatment Act are not adequate substitutes for the habeas writ, the MCA operates as an unconstitutional suspension of that writ. The detainees were not barred from seeking habeas or invoking the Suspension Clause merely because they had been designated as enemy combatants or held at Guantanamo Bay. The Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's ruling and found in favor of the detainees. Justice David H. Souter concurred in the judgment. Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia filed separate dissenting opinions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecisions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecision: 5 votes for Boumediene, 4 vote(s) against\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLegal provision: Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 2: Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #336\u003c\/b\u003e: Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in Hirota v. MacArthur 338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDo U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYes they do. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, writing for a unanimous Court, held that the habeas corpus statute extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command even if part of a larger multinational force. The Court pointed specifically to the statute's application to individuals held in custody \"under color of the authority of the United States\" to hold that actual Government custody is sufficient for jurisdiction in federal courts.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #337\u003c\/b\u003e: Meacham V. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in Smith v. City of Jackson to hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. City of Jackson, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYes. Writing for a 7-1 majority on the issue of burden of proof, Justice David Souter stated that the text and structure of the ADEA indicated that it is the employer, not the employee, who must bear both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion for the use of \"reasonable factors other than age\" in the decision to terminate employment. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment, suggesting that the Congress left the determination of these issues in the hands of the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. Justice Clarence Thomas concurred in part and dissented in part. In his brief dissent, Thomas noted his belief that \"disparate-impact claims\" such as this one, which allege a discriminatory result rather than discriminatory intent, should not be allowed under the ADEA. Justice Stephen Breyer took no part in the decision because he is a significant shareholder in Knolls' parent company\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #338\u003c\/b\u003e: Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYes. In a 7-2 opinion, the Court held the California laws preempted by the National Labor Relations Act because the state laws regulated within \"a zone protected and reserved for market freedom.\" Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the Court, viewed the Act as showing a \"congressional intent to encourage free debate on issues dividing labor and management.\" Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, dissented, arguing that the California laws dealt with funding, not regulation, and did not impermissibly discourage labor-related speech. Employers are still free under the laws to spend their own money on such speech.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #339\u003c\/b\u003e: FL Dept Of Rev V. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy \u0026amp; Tax Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2003, Piccadilly Cafeterias filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy petition in federal court in Florida asking the bankruptcy court for permission to auction off its assets in order to fund a reorganization plan. Piccadilly sought a tax exemption under 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) which states that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax.\" Florida vehemently opposed this exemption and sought to collect $32,000 in taxes from Piccadilly.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bankruptcy court, the district court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit all found in favor of Piccadilly, holding that 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) allowed courts to exempt from taxes pre-confirmation asset sales that were essential to the completion of a reorganization plan. In urging the Court to grant certiorari, Florida pointed to both Third and Fourth Circuit decisions holding that such pre-confirmation asset sales were subject to state taxation, while Piccadilly Cafeterias contended that these so-called \"circuit splits\" only involve a small handful of cases and require no resolution by the Court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(c), a provision of the Bankruptcy Code stating that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax,\" prohibit states from imposing taxes on pre-confirmation asset sales that are essential to the completion of a reorganization plan?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo. The Court held 7-2 that the plain meaning of the statute indicates that it only applies to confirmed asset sales, not \"pre-confirmation\" sales. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas noted Congress' use of the phrase \"plan confirmed\" in Sec. 1146(c), as well as the statute's placement in a sub-chapter titled \"Post-confirmation Matters,\" to hold that the tax exemption should only be applied after a plan has been confirmed. Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice John Paul Stevens, dissented, interpreting this same language to mean that the tax break should apply to asset sales that are subsequently confirmed, even if they were not confirmed at the time the sales were made.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecisions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecision: 7 votes for Florida Department of Revenue, 2 vote(s) against\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLegal provision: Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSort by Ideology\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #342\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Pitfalls of Hidden Data in Your Legal Electric Docs \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMetadata is \"data about data.\" Although it sounds quite modern, one form of metadata is no doubt familiar to every lawyer: the \"fax band\" on a document received by facsimile that shows the time and date the fax was received, the number from which it came, and the number of pages sent. Thus, a fax band is metadata since it is data about data. But it's more than\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ejust data. The information hidden and traceable therein and the amount of data encoded can be disturbing. There are, however, effective and more secure ways to address the problems of embedded data. James Griffiths\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewill provides a wealth of information about little known and vital techniques to mitigate the ongoing danger of hidden data and the damage it could do to you and your law firm.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #343\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Facebook, Twitter and Other Social Networking Sites\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eSocial Networking Websites and Legal Ethics: The ethical issues of Facebook, Twitter, and other networking websites. As social networking websites such as MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin increase in popularity and influence, their impact has reached the legal community in a number of ways.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis CLE will discuss several of the ethical issues created by that influence, including issues involving attorney's own Facebook accounts, use of Facebook information in discovery and witness interviews, Twitter in the courts, and the legal pitfalls of LinkedIn employee reviews, to name a few.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e  \u003c\/p\u003e","published_at":"2015-01-17T11:32:00-08:00","created_at":"2015-01-17T11:32:07-08:00","vendor":"clelaw","type":"CD's","tags":["17 Hr","Audio CD","cds","clelaw","credit-state_california","credit-state_florida","credit-state_illinois","credit-state_new-jersey","credit-state_new-york","Format_Audio CD","Format_MP3","Format_OnDemand Video"],"price":27900,"price_min":27900,"price_max":27900,"available":true,"price_varies":false,"compare_at_price":null,"compare_at_price_min":0,"compare_at_price_max":0,"compare_at_price_varies":false,"variants":[{"id":1109422003,"title":"17 Unit CLE Bundle - 347 SERIES","option1":"17 Unit CLE Bundle - 347 SERIES","option2":null,"option3":null,"sku":"17 Hr - 347 SERIES","requires_shipping":true,"taxable":true,"featured_image":null,"available":true,"name":"17 Unit CLE Audio CD Bundle - 347 SERIES - 17 Unit CLE Bundle - 347 SERIES","public_title":"17 Unit CLE Bundle - 347 SERIES","options":["17 Unit CLE Bundle - 347 SERIES"],"price":27900,"weight":0,"compare_at_price":null,"inventory_quantity":-19,"inventory_management":null,"inventory_policy":"deny","barcode":"","requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_allocations":[]}],"images":["\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_7.jpg?v=1504900009"],"featured_image":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_7.jpg?v=1504900009","options":["Title"],"media":[{"alt":null,"id":12037390415,"position":1,"preview_image":{"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":1333,"width":2000,"src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_7.jpg?v=1504900009"},"aspect_ratio":1.5,"height":1333,"media_type":"image","src":"\/\/www.clelaw.com\/cdn\/shop\/products\/Untitled_design_7.jpg?v=1504900009","width":2000}],"requires_selling_plan":false,"selling_plan_groups":[],"content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: #0000ff;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e17 Hour CLE Package Includes 17 hours of any of the following selections:\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"\u003eBundle 347\u003c\/strong\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #277\u003c\/b\u003e: \u003c\/b\u003eSubstance Abuse: Neurochemistry of Addition and Recovery\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHave you ever wondered how a physical substance like a psychoactive drug can change a mental or emotional state? To understand how this can happen, it may be helpful to know that all mental and emotional states are, in part, just manifestations of our brain chemistry. Slight changes in the levels and activities of certain brain chemicals (called neurotransmitters) can make for noticeable and sometimes dramatic changes in our moods and our thinking. The human brain is a collection of about three \u003cem\u003etrillion\u003c\/em\u003e cells called \u003cem\u003eneurons\u003c\/em\u003e, long, thin electrically-charged chemical-filled wire-like cells with electrochemical contacts on each end. Unlike other areas of our body where cells physically connect to each other, no two neurons actually touch. Neurons can only act collectively if they are able to communicate with and affect the action of other neurons. They communicate by releasing chemical signals accross the gaps that lie between them. (called synapses).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eScience has so far identified about 80 chemicals (called \u003cem\u003eneurotransmitters\u003c\/em\u003e) in the human brain. Each of us has the same 80-odd neurotransmitters. These brain chemicals tend to function in a fairly task-specific way - accounting for a limited number of actions and effects depending on which part of the brain the neurochemical activity is taking place.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCOURSE #301\u003c\/b\u003e: Hidden Estate Decimators - Income In Respect Of A Decedent\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe House Ways and Means Committee released a draft of a tax plan that would raise the highest income tax rate by 4.3 % to 39.3%. By 2010 the highest income tax rate would excel to 44% after 2010.  This would lift the Federal Income Tax Higher than it’s been since 1976.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnd get this:  For families with incomes between $250K and 500K the “marginal” tax rate paid on the next dollar of earned income could sour to 80%, or some cases above 100%.  In other words, some Americans could pay $1 in taxes for every $1 they earn under the House tax plan.  This means that the income taxes paid by the top 1% would go to 40% of all paid taxes of the entire tax paying population.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following discussion will show you how to mitigate the brutality of the Hidden Estate Decimator\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #302\u003c\/b\u003e: Effective Estate And Tax Planning\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence.  That would include Federal Estate and Gift tax, Income tax, and Property tax and State probate law.  Making even more complicated; however, is ERISA. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePassed in 1974 it created retirement accounts.  Jack will now take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to “to do them right the first time. Rarely is there a second chance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #303\u003c\/b\u003e: Essential Keys To Probate Calendar Notes To Judgment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHow many calendars are you currently using in your legal practice? How well have you organized them?  Ultimate calendar control means no missed deadline or appointments.  James Mikacich, a highly experienced probate attorney, will show you how to take control of critical areas that often fall through the cracks.  His system will allow you quickly and efficiently manage your notes all the way to judgment....every time!\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #304\u003c\/b\u003e: How To Successfully Handle A Personal Injury Case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHandling a P.I. cases isn’t rocket science, but you have to do it right.  Assuming you get your first P.I., what do you do with it?  Discover the secrets of one of California’s most eminent P.I. attorneys, as he takes you on a tour of the classic pitfalls of uncorrectable sin of sins that can bury your practice in an instant.  So come join us for this revealing lecture that you can’t afford to miss.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #305\u003c\/b\u003e: Critical Essentials Of Advanced Trust Planning\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover Advanced Estate Planning Techniques beyond the Basics of Estate Planning Trusts. This course covers Generation Skipping Transfers, Spousal Trusts,  Survivors Trusts, Marital Deduction Trusts, Bypass Trusts, and  Unified Credits at the Death of First Spouse. This will assist with Estate Planning for Multigenerational gifting, leaving property in Trusts and Generation Skipping Transfer Taxes.  Revocable Trusts A\/B\/C\/D Arrangements are also included.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #306\u003c\/b\u003e: Bias: How To Do A Sexual Harassment Investigation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTen years ago, the EEOC issued a policy on sexual harassment, including how to investigate complaints of sexual harassment. This discussion will present the EEOC's advice and offer suggestions for conducting investigations, based on the case law. Keep in mind that both the EEOC's policy recommendations and the following discussion of it apply equally to all forms of unlawful harassment, such as race, age, disability, religion, etc. harassment\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #307\u003c\/b\u003e: How To Use Government Benefits To Satisfy Child Support\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaphne completed her undergraduate degree at the University of Chicago and her J.D. degree at the University of California, Berkeley.  She brings to the table 20 plus years of in-depth experience.  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis course is a rich resource that gives you the facts you need to know to make relevant family law decisions.  Want to know who qualifies for SSI or Title 11?  Need critical insights on how the Family Benefits Program works?  How much income can a family expect to receive and much, much more?  Come join us for her informative and insightful must-have lecture offering practical insights that can help your case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #308\u003c\/b\u003e: Winning Techniques To Cross Examine During Trial\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHave you ever found yourself “on the spot,” forced to respond to difficult questions? Regardless of whether the questions came from clients inquiring about their cases, from a senior partner asking about a brief you wrote, or from a judge cross examining you during a motion hearing, it’s always a frustrating experience when you’re asked difficult questions that you haven’t anticipated and aren’t fully prepared to answer.  How can you do that when you have no idea what to say and desperately need a few extra moments to gather your thoughts? \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere are some simple techniques you can use to buy that extra time ou need before responding to a difficult question.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #311\u003c\/b\u003e: Honing Your Skills For Trial Preparation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA winning preparation is key to your successful case strategy.  This includes correctly lining up your expert witneses, deterining causation, interviewing the witnesses and and closely examing  each and every detail of your Case.  What if you win your case and it is appealed to the Administrative Procedures?   Can it be overturned?  What is your next option?   Come join us for this compelling real life case. The answer may surprise you.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #313\u003c\/b\u003e: Winning A Personal Injury Case\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid Asch takes you behind closed doors and unlocks the secrets of more than 20 years of hard won experience to give you his valuable input.  Each point is loaded a wealth of information that keeps you ahead of the game.  You'll discover critical rules to operate by such as:  problems to avoid when filling out the proper forms, what to do when your client has no auto insurance, what other problems does the client have when they can’t afford insurance?  Uninsured Motorist Coverage;  The effects of underinsured motorists on your case and your client, maximizing your clients claim, important insights to the holy grail for the defense, critical elements  to put into your fee agreements, how a conflict of interest agreement can protect you and your client and much more\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #314\u003c\/b\u003e: How Will The North American Union Effect Your Law Practice\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHow will an economic and political union of Canada, U.S.A. and Mexico integrate the legal systems, common law and civil law, of all three countries?   What kind of supranational entities will be utilized to assure its success?  How will this change the economic and political infrastructure to give birth to a new super state much like the European Union?  More importantly,  what will the role of the judicial systems of each country play to bring about uniformity of law and eventual political integration of all three states called the North American Union?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCome join us for this provocative presentation by Hector Gonzales, a successful Mexican attorney, as he discusses the issues and answers that will possibly could realize the once bold vision of Simon Bolivar and the father of the European Union Jean Monet to the North American continent\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #315\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Practice law with integrity Part 1\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid you know that every year, hundreds of attorneys are brought up on ethics violation charges? If you’ve got “dirty laundry in your ethical closet, the cost of defending yourself may far exceed anything you’ve imaged, including your license to practice law. Joel Primes uses his experience as an administrative law judge to show you how to avoid potential pitfalls, disgrace, and the ongoing consequences to your law practice.  Moreover, his invaluable insights, humor with arm you with vital information to keep your firm clean, strong and prosperous for years to come.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #316\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Practice law with integrity Part 2\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDid you know that every year, hundreds of attorneys are brought up on ethics violation charges? If you’ve got “dirty laundry in your ethical closet, the cost of defending yourself may far exceed anything you’ve imaged, including your license to practice law. Joel Primes uses his experience as an administrative law judge to show you how to avoid potential pitfalls, disgrace, and the ongoing consequences to your law practice.  Moreover, his invaluable insights, humor with arm you with vital information to keep your firm clean, strong and prosperous for years to come.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #317\u003c\/b\u003e: When, Why And How To Use A Trial Bifurcation\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e When and how should you bifurcate? The practice of bifurcating a case has its advantages.  It can accelerate a resolution of one aspect of the case while providing an opportunity for the court to resolve the overall case, thus making it conducive to expedition and economy.  Thus allowing the court to order a separate trial of any cause of action…. or any separate issue or any number of causes of action or issues.  This lecture is highly beneficial to providing practical skill and understanding in successfully undertaking this action.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #318\u003c\/b\u003e: Estate Plans: The Grand Tour Of Complex Issues Part 1\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence.  That would include Federal Estate and Gift tax, Income tax, and Property tax and State probate law.  Making even more complicated; however, is ERISA.  Passed in 1974, it created retirement accounts.  Jack will now take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to do them right the first time. Rarely is there a second chance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #319\u003c\/b\u003e: Estate Plans: The Grand Tour Of Complex Issues Part 2\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEstate and Gift taxes are very complex.  Anything you touch in terms of business transactions or Estate Planning will have a tax consequence.  That would include Federal Estate and Gift tax, Income tax, and Property tax and State probate law.  Making even more complicated; however, is ERISA.  Passed in 1974, it created retirement accounts.  Jack will now take you on the ‘grand tour’ of all the above to give you a better understanding of this complex array of taxes why it’s vitally important to do them right the first time. Rarely is there a second chance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #320\u003c\/b\u003e: How You Can Win With Post Trial Motions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe long jury trial has now come to an end and your worst fears are realized as the jury renders a verdict that hammers your client.  What to do?  Appeal might be possible but there is a quicker solution – the post trial Motion for a New Trial and Motion for Judgment notwithstanding the Verdict.  This class will cover both of these Motions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #330\u003c\/b\u003e: Construction Contracts:  AIA Vs. Consensus Documents\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. Learn how to effectively adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects, how to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert.  You’ll also learn how minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people and the right drafting priorities.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #331\u003c\/b\u003e: Projects Gone Bad And The Litigation That Follows\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA Continuation of Course # 330\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiscover the most effective techniques of avoiding construction litigation along with classic litigation pitfalls while learning how to maximize your chances for success. Learn how to effectively adapt to changing circumstances on construction projects, how to avoid the wayward witness and the contentious expert.  You’ll also learn how minimize uncertainty by choosing the right contract, the right people and the right drafting priorities.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #334\u003c\/b\u003e: Boumediene V. Bush: Guantanimo Or U.S. Courrt\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Can the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2002 Lakhdar Boumediene and five other Algerian natives were seized by Bosnian police when U.S. intelligence officers suspected their involvement in a plot to attack the U.S. embassy there. The U.S. government classified the men as enemy combatants in the war on terror and detained them at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, which is located on land that the U.S. leases from Cuba. Boumediene filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging violations of the Constitution's Due Process Clause, various statutes and treaties, the common law, and international law. The District Court judge granted the government's motion to have all of the claims dismissed on the ground that Boumediene, as an alien detained at an overseas military base, had no right to a habeas petition. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal but the Supreme Court reversed in Rasul v. Bush, which held that the habeas statute extends to non-citizen detainees at Guantanamo.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2006, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA). The Act eliminates federal courts' jurisdiction to hear habeas applications from detainees who have been designated (according to procedures established in the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005) as enemy combatants. When the case was appealed to the D.C. Circuit for the second time, the detainees argued that the MCA did not apply to their petitions, and that if it did, it was unconstitutional under the Suspension Clause. The Suspension Clause reads: \"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the government on both points. It cited language in the MCA applying the law to \"all cases, without exception\" that pertain to aspects of detention. One of the purposes of the MCA, according to the Circuit Court, was to overrule the Supreme Court's opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which had allowed petitions like Boumediene's to go forward. The D.C. Circuit held that the Suspension Clause only protects the writ of habeas corpus as it existed in 1789, and that the writ would not have been understood in 1789 to apply to an overseas military base leased from a foreign government. Constitutional rights do not apply to aliens outside of the United States, the court held, and the leased military base in Cuba does not qualify as inside the geographic borders of the U.S. In a rare reversal, the Supreme Court granted certiorari after initially denying review three months earlier.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1. Should the Military Commissions Act of 2006 be interpreted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by foreign citizens detained at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2. If so, is the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a violation of the Suspension Clause of the Constitution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3. Are the detainees at Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection of the Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law and of the Geneva Conventions?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4. Can the detainees challenge the adequacy of judicial review provisions of the MCA before they have sought to invoke that review?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA five-justice majority answered yes to each of these questions. The opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated that if the MCA is considered valid its legislative history requires that the detainees' cases be dismissed. However, the Court went on to state that because the procedures laid out in the Detainee Treatment Act are not adequate substitutes for the habeas writ, the MCA operates as an unconstitutional suspension of that writ. The detainees were not barred from seeking habeas or invoking the Suspension Clause merely because they had been designated as enemy combatants or held at Guantanamo Bay. The Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's ruling and found in favor of the detainees. Justice David H. Souter concurred in the judgment. Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia filed separate dissenting opinions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecisions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecision: 5 votes for Boumediene, 4 vote(s) against\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLegal provision: Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 2: Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #336\u003c\/b\u003e: Munaf V. Geren: Habeas Corpus And The Military\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2005, Mohammad Munaf was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping by U.S. military officers acting as part of a multinational force in Iraq. Munaf's sister petitioned on his behalf for habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. Soon after the petition was filed, Munaf was informed that he would be tried in an Iraqi court and transferred to Iraqi custody if convicted. Munaf filed a temporary restraining order attempting to block custody transfer.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the Iraqi court sentenced him to death and the district court dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, Munaf appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which granted an injunction against the transfer. However, the D.C. Circuit, like the district court, eventually concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over Munaf's claim, basing its decision largely on the Court's ruling in Hirota v. MacArthur 338 U.S. 197 (1948). That decision prohibited Japanese citizens held abroad by U.S. troops from filing habeas petitions to challenge sentences handed down by a military tribunal sitting in Japan but including U.S. military personnel. Petitioner urges the Court to set aside Hirota and its ruling and to base its reasoning on a string of cases reaching the opposite result. The case will be consolidated and heard along with another D.C. case, Geren v. Omar, 07-394, in which the D.C. Circuit allowed a habeas petition by a U.S. citizen held in Iraq because he had not yet been charged or convicted by an Iraqi court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDo U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought on behalf of U.S. citizens detained overseas by American military authorities working as part of a multinational force?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYes they do. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, writing for a unanimous Court, held that the habeas corpus statute extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command even if part of a larger multinational force. The Court pointed specifically to the statute's application to individuals held in custody \"under color of the authority of the United States\" to hold that actual Government custody is sufficient for jurisdiction in federal courts.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #337\u003c\/b\u003e: Meacham V. Knolls Atomic Power Lab: Labor Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the New York-based federal research laboratory Knolls Atomic Power Lab instituted a downsizing program, it asked supervisors to rank employees based on three factors: performance, flexibility, and the criticality of their skills, and then to add points for years of service in order to determine who would be dismissed. Of the thirty-one employees who were let go, all but one were over the age of forty. Twenty-six of these dismissed employees filed suit against Knolls for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A jury found for the employees and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the judgment, relying on its 2005 decision in Smith v. City of Jackson to hold that \"an employer is not liable under the ADEA so long as the challenged employment action, in relying on specific non-age factors, constitutes a reasonable means to the employer's legitimate goals.\" On remand, the Second Circuit vacated its previous decision and held that the employees had failed to carry their burden of proving the evaluation system unreasonable. In seeking Supreme Court review, the employees argued that it should be Knolls, not them, who must prove the reasonableness of an action that would otherwise be prohibited.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUnder the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. City of Jackson, must the employer or the employee prove the reasonableness of adverse employment decisions occurring as part of a claim for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYes. Writing for a 7-1 majority on the issue of burden of proof, Justice David Souter stated that the text and structure of the ADEA indicated that it is the employer, not the employee, who must bear both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion for the use of \"reasonable factors other than age\" in the decision to terminate employment. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment, suggesting that the Congress left the determination of these issues in the hands of the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. Justice Clarence Thomas concurred in part and dissented in part. In his brief dissent, Thomas noted his belief that \"disparate-impact claims\" such as this one, which allege a discriminatory result rather than discriminatory intent, should not be allowed under the ADEA. Justice Stephen Breyer took no part in the decision because he is a significant shareholder in Knolls' parent company\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #338\u003c\/b\u003e: Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown: Labor Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the California legislature passed laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" a group of California companies brought suit claiming the state laws were preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 7. The Act provides that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered evidence of unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers. The California companies argued that the state laws infringe upon their \"safe harbor\" for anti-labor speech embodied in the Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after entering two panel decisions holding the California law preempted, issued a split en banc opinion holding that it was not. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion on similar facts. The Court's decision in this case will affect roughly a dozen other states currently considering adopting legislation substantially similar to the California law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes the National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies' anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to \"assist, promote, or deter union organizing,\" even if the public funds are transparently segregated?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYes. In a 7-2 opinion, the Court held the California laws preempted by the National Labor Relations Act because the state laws regulated within \"a zone protected and reserved for market freedom.\" Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the Court, viewed the Act as showing a \"congressional intent to encourage free debate on issues dividing labor and management.\" Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, dissented, arguing that the California laws dealt with funding, not regulation, and did not impermissibly discourage labor-related speech. Employers are still free under the laws to spend their own money on such speech.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #339\u003c\/b\u003e: FL Dept Of Rev V. Piccadilly: Bankruptcy \u0026amp; Tax Law\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFacts of the Case:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2003, Piccadilly Cafeterias filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy petition in federal court in Florida asking the bankruptcy court for permission to auction off its assets in order to fund a reorganization plan. Piccadilly sought a tax exemption under 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) which states that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax.\" Florida vehemently opposed this exemption and sought to collect $32,000 in taxes from Piccadilly.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bankruptcy court, the district court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit all found in favor of Piccadilly, holding that 11 U.S.C. 1146(c) allowed courts to exempt from taxes pre-confirmation asset sales that were essential to the completion of a reorganization plan. In urging the Court to grant certiorari, Florida pointed to both Third and Fourth Circuit decisions holding that such pre-confirmation asset sales were subject to state taxation, while Piccadilly Cafeterias contended that these so-called \"circuit splits\" only involve a small handful of cases and require no resolution by the Court.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuestion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoes 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(c), a provision of the Bankruptcy Code stating that certain asset transfers \"under a [confirmed Chapter 11] plan may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax,\" prohibit states from imposing taxes on pre-confirmation asset sales that are essential to the completion of a reorganization plan?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo. The Court held 7-2 that the plain meaning of the statute indicates that it only applies to confirmed asset sales, not \"pre-confirmation\" sales. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas noted Congress' use of the phrase \"plan confirmed\" in Sec. 1146(c), as well as the statute's placement in a sub-chapter titled \"Post-confirmation Matters,\" to hold that the tax exemption should only be applied after a plan has been confirmed. Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice John Paul Stevens, dissented, interpreting this same language to mean that the tax break should apply to asset sales that are subsequently confirmed, even if they were not confirmed at the time the sales were made.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecisions\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecision: 7 votes for Florida Department of Revenue, 2 vote(s) against\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLegal provision: Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSort by Ideology\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #342\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Pitfalls of Hidden Data in Your Legal Electric Docs \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMetadata is \"data about data.\" Although it sounds quite modern, one form of metadata is no doubt familiar to every lawyer: the \"fax band\" on a document received by facsimile that shows the time and date the fax was received, the number from which it came, and the number of pages sent. Thus, a fax band is metadata since it is data about data. But it's more than\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ejust data. The information hidden and traceable therein and the amount of data encoded can be disturbing. There are, however, effective and more secure ways to address the problems of embedded data. James Griffiths\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewill provides a wealth of information about little known and vital techniques to mitigate the ongoing danger of hidden data and the damage it could do to you and your law firm.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eCOURSE #343\u003c\/b\u003e: Ethics: Facebook, Twitter and Other Social Networking Sites\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eSocial Networking Websites and Legal Ethics: The ethical issues of Facebook, Twitter, and other networking websites. As social networking websites such as MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin increase in popularity and influence, their impact has reached the legal community in a number of ways.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis CLE will discuss several of the ethical issues created by that influence, including issues involving attorney's own Facebook accounts, use of Facebook information in discovery and witness interviews, Twitter in the courts, and the legal pitfalls of LinkedIn employee reviews, to name a few.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e  \u003c\/p\u003e"}